Trade 114060 for 'vintage' Submariner?

[rmlovett1]

Originally Posted by Maiden

For me, and this may cause a little controversy, but the five digits are not really vintage, they are the "older" modern Rolex and the new six digit versions are the proper evolution of the modern luxury version, with changes that would be expected, ie a bracelet befitting a watch that costs several thousand dollars.

I would do as Adam said, go for the 5513, that is a true vintage watch with the plexi ect,....five digits are not vintage IMO, just the previous modern version if that makes any sense?

There's definitive arguments over what is vintage vs not vintage ....as a 5513 was produced into 1990. So would a glossy dial, WG surrounds dial '88-'89, 5513 be considered a vintage watch, vs a '79-'83, matte dial, tritium dial, 16800 not being vintage? Many opinions on this subject