ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

albmich · 23 March 2017, 01:24 PM

Seadweller 50th anniversary.

There has been a lot of effort made to describe why the previous seadwellers didn't have cyclops. At the depth it was rated for, it would cause failure of the crystal.

But the new seadweller obviously has cyclops and I can't find any explanation anywhere on how the technology has changed and why it's no longer an issue that would cause crystal failure at 4000ft. Does anyone know? Or is Rolex rolling the dice and betting the odds that 0.00001% of people with the seadweller will actually dive to that depth?

23 March 2017, 01:24 PM	#1
albmich "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: WI Watch: SD4k Posts: 1,333	How has the technology changed? Seadweller 50th anniversary. There has been a lot of effort made to describe why the previous seadwellers didn't have cyclops. At the depth it was rated for, it would cause failure of the crystal. But the new seadweller obviously has cyclops and I can't find any explanation anywhere on how the technology has changed and why it's no longer an issue that would cause crystal failure at 4000ft. Does anyone know? Or is Rolex rolling the dice and betting the odds that 0.00001% of people with the seadweller will actually dive to that depth? __________________ ♛ SD4k 116600 ♛ SD43 126600 Ω PloProf 224.32.55.21.01.001

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)