ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Oboema Sesetokoe · 12 June 2017, 11:14 PM

Better late, than never......

My Lemania 15TL from the early 40-ies has the same.

My watchmaker says it is probably because of the position of the watch, when you don't wear the watch. If you put the watch on its caseback, the balance-wheel has less resistance. Than the watch runs faster. This is the way I put my Lemania in the safe.

If you wear the watch, its position changes al the time. Then the balance-wheel has more resistance, and the watch runs slower.

Ofcourse it's more complicated, but this should be the story in the nutcase.

12 June 2017, 11:14 PM	#4
Oboema Sesetokoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Matthijs Location: Europe Watch: Patek & AP Posts: 615	Better late, than never...... My Lemania 15TL from the early 40-ies has the same. My watchmaker says it is probably because of the position of the watch, when you don't wear the watch. If you put the watch on its caseback, the balance-wheel has less resistance. Than the watch runs faster. This is the way I put my Lemania in the safe. If you wear the watch, its position changes al the time. Then the balance-wheel has more resistance, and the watch runs slower. Ofcourse it's more complicated, but this should be the story in the nutcase.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)