ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

faimag · 13 November 2018, 02:36 AM

I don't think the material of the bezel/insert is a determining factor for me. I have predominantly stayed away from the ceramic Sub/GMT mainly because the whole watch just doesn't sing to me. The case and lugs are spoiling it for me; the ceramic bezel looks ok overall, although the numbers look a bit too "tech-like" for my taste.

From the ceramics, I only like the 116655.

For the same exact watch (e.g. 116520 vs 116500), I tend to prefer the metal bezel as opposed to the ceramic one (again, with the exception of the 116519 silver on OF).

13 November 2018, 02:36 AM	#31
faimag "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: US, SG, DK, GR Watch: Reverso Posts: 3,089	I don't think the material of the bezel/insert is a determining factor for me. I have predominantly stayed away from the ceramic Sub/GMT mainly because the whole watch just doesn't sing to me. The case and lugs are spoiling it for me; the ceramic bezel looks ok overall, although the numbers look a bit too "tech-like" for my taste. From the ceramics, I only like the 116655. For the same exact watch (e.g. 116520 vs 116500), I tend to prefer the metal bezel as opposed to the ceramic one (again, with the exception of the 116519 silver on OF).

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)