ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 November 2018, 11:44 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: IG @onthedial
Posts: 587
|
@Kingface66
As I read the responses in chronological order I found myself disagreeing with the notion that you shouldn't contact LAWW simply because too much time has passed, though I understand sentiment. But for the benefit of knowledge I think passing along the "occurrence" can only be a good thing. As the years pass the potential for more and more of these episodes increases, one would assume. Perhaps there can be a Best Practices procedure (prevention) that comes out of this? And, as you noted, your contact-approach was "very open-hearted" so I don't see how any ill-will could come out of it. Just my 2 cents. _____________ Instagram: @onthedial |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.