ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
20 January 2019, 08:40 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
|
Quote:
Much more than just inflection. Agreed, as a common (or even concrete) noun, the plural of the word rolex would be rolexes, however the op’s question was “what is the plural of Rolex” In that context, Rolex (note the capitalisation) is a proper noun (not a common or concrete noun) and as such has no plural, as the proper noun “Rolex” is not the watch on your wrist but specifically the company that manufactures it. The trade mark referent is actually somewhat of a red herring. (I think )
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.