ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 February 2009, 06:45 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 134
|
enter all you paneristi
Most of you may be aware that I recently posted "faulty pam" which was a detailed description of the faulty 275 that I purchased. Now I need your help in deciding what my next step is. I have been given a few options by my AD which have left me perplexed as in what to do. There are three pams that are arriving to my country in the next week that I am being given first priority as to which I want (if any are to my liking at all.) Please do not take into account the extra money I'll need to add for any particular watch as I will be given a great discount on any I choose. To judge on basis of looks is less critical because I am equally pleased by all three of the watches' exteriors. What is important to me is the reliability of the watch, exclusivity, and future value. I would greatly like to hear all opinions, large and small. I am sorry that I have posted this simultaneously on a few forums. My decision must be hasty and of course a good one. Here are the models 1) Pam 277 a unique special edition of 250 units only produced in 2007
http://www.panerai.com/s_special_edi...categoria=7295 2) Pam 311 http://www.panerai.com/s_page.xpd?id...categoria=7291 3) Pam 289 http://www.panerai.com/s_page.xpd?id_lingua=2&id_sezione=16&id_prodotto=7 290&id_categoria=5784 Now they are willing to replace my 275; however, they are not sure if and when one will arrive. I am pretty much going to do what you guys tell me to do so please think it over. I guess the real question is if I can trust the calibre of the 2004 as opposed to the 2003. I think this is a question for all paneristi because these are watches that not only represent the company in their exterior aspects but their inner ones as well; for they are 100% Panerai!! Thanks |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.