ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 January 2020, 12:12 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
|
9 January 2020, 11:15 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
|
Hi everybody.
I was reading this post and I checked my 1655, I'm not sure if I have a service bezel or a Mark 4, can anyone advise? Also which one will be correct for a 7.06xxxx (1981) Thank you! |
9 January 2020, 11:32 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 620
|
take a closer look at the 8's in your bezel -- service the bottom part of the 8 is round, on MK4 it is oval..
|
9 January 2020, 11:40 AM | #34 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 620
|
|
9 January 2020, 01:14 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: mario
Location: NY-USA
Watch: Rolex 1675/8
Posts: 535
|
Thank you for the info! So my next question is, the MK4 would be the correct for it? Or a MK3?
I'm at a point in my collection where I try to have as much as I can period correct pieces, so I guess I became "hyper enthusiast" :) And I wouldn't mind change it for the correct one. |
9 January 2020, 01:48 PM | #36 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 620
|
Here's why i say i wouldn't worry about it -- who really knows what the 'correct' combinations (within reason) were? You have an Mk4 dial which certain resources should say stopped in the 6.5mm range (check post #4 from this thread). You have a 7.0mm watch. Does that mean it's incorrect? Who's to say...
If you had a 2.9mm serial watch with an MK4 dial, we'd know it wasn't correct. With yours, i certainly wouldn't say that about the dial. And as I said, the MK4 bezel (which i'd say is most likely the 'correct' bezel based on your serial) looks very similar to the 'service' bezel, which for all I know could have found its way on to watches as original (others may have better view on this). BTW, i am a reforming (not quite reformed) hyper enthusiast myself and the 1655 in particular is helping me to relax. I have an mk2 dial with a 2.77mm serial when certain resources would say the dial started at 2.9mm. I've come to the conclusion that it could very well have left the factory this way...and have relaxed... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.