The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 1 January 2020, 01:26 AM   #1
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
Dj 15037

I made a mistake in the thread title: this is a perpetual date and not a Datejust. The reference number is 15037.

I am looking at this one from 1986. Please share your observations. The watch loses 4 seconds in a 24 period. It is offered by an authorized dealer who replaced the acrylic crystal and polished the case.
Attached Images
 
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2020, 02:21 AM   #2
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
Here a few more images:
Attached Images
 
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2020, 02:23 AM   #3
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
One more:
Attached Images
 
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2020, 02:26 AM   #4
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
Looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks.
Attached Images
 
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2020, 02:32 AM   #5
Etouffee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 20
Oyster and Perpetual are too far apart and where is "Just" after Date???
Etouffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2020, 02:39 AM   #6
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etouffee View Post
Oyster and Perpetual are too far apart and where is "Just" after Date???
THANK YOU!
Interesting observation: Oyster and Perpetual being too far apart...
Regarding your question: I made a mistake. this is not a Datejust but a perpetual date. this is a 34mm watch
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2020, 02:59 AM   #7
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,295
It's not possible to be definitive based on those photos, but I suspect that the dial and hands are service items, possibly from the late 90s. Not saying this is a deal-breaker, but just something you may want to investigate if it matters to you.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2020, 03:37 AM   #8
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
Does this photo tell us anything about the dial and hands... being service items?
Thank you!!!
Attached Images
 
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2020, 07:04 AM   #9
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
Please share your observations.
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2020, 12:09 PM   #10
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
In the last 24 hour period the watch lost 7 seconds. :(
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2020, 12:47 PM   #11
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,295
Based on the photos, I'm not feeling that the lume on dial and hands is tritium from 1986.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2020, 05:41 PM   #12
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
looks like replaced hands and refinished dial, otherwise not a bad 14k gold date
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2020, 11:54 PM   #13
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
I am learning about this watch thanks to you all. I am grateful. Matt
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2020, 01:07 AM   #14
carwashchris
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Ohio
Watch: Vintage DD'S
Posts: 877
I'm wearing my 1505 right now and there is almost NO gap between the O/P
carwashchris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2020, 03:20 PM   #15
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
Thank you, Chris.

I am wondering what degree of time-keeping accuracy I can reasonably expect from this watch. This 15037 loses about 8 seconds in a 24 hour period. Is this too far off for this vintage 1986 watch or still within an acceptable range?
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2020, 12:33 AM   #16
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by franklin View Post
Thank you, Chris.

I am wondering what degree of time-keeping accuracy I can reasonably expect from this watch. This 15037 loses about 8 seconds in a 24 hour period. Is this too far off for this vintage 1986 watch or still within an acceptable range?
Most likely, if the watch has been recently serviced, it could be regulated to have a smaller delta over 24 hours in a single position. However, timekeeping is much more complicated than simply measuring the accuracy in a single position before and after 24 hours. I suggest reading some articles about wristwatch movement accuracy, positional variation, isochronism, etc., and you will better understand the nuances involved.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2020, 01:49 AM   #17
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
Thank you, Dan. I will.
Great search terms.
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 12:01 PM   #18
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
I am trying to ascertain the approximate market value of this watch. Is $4000 US a good estimate?
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 12:05 PM   #19
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,295
nm
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2020, 06:08 AM   #20
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
To clarify, I hear you saying that discussions of market value are off topic in this forum.
Am I right?

I think I will purchase this watch for the simple reason that I like it.
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2020, 12:19 AM   #21
Patou Batemanou
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by franklin View Post
I am trying to ascertain the approximate market value of this watch. Is $4000 US a good estimate?
If i had to buy it (I certainly wouldn't: too many uncertainties) I wouldn't spend more than 2500€ in this

edit: 2000€, no jubilee with it
Patou Batemanou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2020, 04:57 AM   #22
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patou Batemanou View Post
If i had to buy it (I certainly wouldn't: too many uncertainties) I wouldn't spend more than 2500€ in this

edit: 2000€, no jubilee with it
Thank you.
Can you identify some of the uncertainties?
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2020, 09:46 AM   #23
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
Is the Rolex 15037 not a sought after watch?
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2020, 10:39 PM   #24
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
I found this article in Forbes https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.forb...ket-guide/amp/
“If you are looking to score a gold timepiece without having to break the bank, the vintage market is your best bet. Rolex introduced the Date Reference 15037 during the 1980s, featuring a 14 karat yellow gold case, crown, and caseback. Gold means this timepiece will fit in swimmingly at formal events, but what I like most is that the 33 millimeter case ensures the wristwatch remains elegant, not loud”
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2020, 12:26 AM   #25
franklin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
Does the movement inside the 15037 have a slipping clutch mechanism which prevents overwinding of the watch?
franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.