ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Aelitis · 3 March 2020, 05:15 AM

To all the bubbleback experts out there: What is your opinion on this watch? Everything correct or do you have any doubts? Re-dial?
Can you recommend a trusted source of information regarding bubblebacks?
I very much appreciate your help.

Best,
Sebastian

AJMarcus · 4 March 2020, 05:15 AM

The real experts will come along but to me the dial looks refinished once upon a time. The hands look a bit odd to me

offrdmania · 4 March 2020, 06:36 AM

I think the hands are a later addition.

spoilsofwar01 · 4 March 2020, 06:40 AM

the discoloration on the outer edge between numerals 2 and 4 concerns me, but as already mentioned some better informed members will offer up a more informed opinion's to help you out,

watch-guy.com · 4 March 2020, 08:25 AM

I think this is original. It is later BB and the dial looks OK and original-
Hands may be original

Crown is Super Oyster which is correct

Julian

R.W.T. · 4 March 2020, 09:23 PM

The rotor mechanism didn't come on that base movement. That is a rare factory GOLD PLATED 645 rotor mechanism with 7 jewels instead of the traditional 2 or 2 hardened steel bushings. The movement should ALSO be gold plated if it came with that rotor and it's clearly not. That doesn't really affect anything....it just means your rotor won't wear out. The rotor weight should also be gold plated if it were all born together. The dial I think is refinished. The hands are fine the could have come with that dial.

3 March 2020, 05:15 AM	#1
Aelitis "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Location: Germany Posts: 11	Opinions on Rolex Bubbleback To all the bubbleback experts out there: What is your opinion on this watch? Everything correct or do you have any doubts? Re-dial? Can you recommend a trusted source of information regarding bubblebacks? I very much appreciate your help. Best, Sebastian

4 March 2020, 06:36 AM	#3
offrdmania 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Matt Location: Wine Country, Ca Posts: 5,998	I think the hands are a later addition. __________________ TRF Member 11738

4 March 2020, 06:40 AM	#4
spoilsofwar01 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Real Name: "H" Location: England Watch: ing Rainclouds Posts: 1,439	outer edge the discoloration on the outer edge between numerals 2 and 4 concerns me, but as already mentioned some better informed members will offer up a more informed opinion's to help you out, __________________ "H" 5513 Submariner 1968 114270 Explorer 2005 Smiths W10 1968 Tissot Seastar 2011

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

4 March 2020, 05:15 AM	#2
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,238	The real experts will come along but to me the dial looks refinished once upon a time. The hands look a bit odd to me

4 March 2020, 08:25 AM	#5
watch-guy.com Banned Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: United States Posts: 501	I think this is original. It is later BB and the dial looks OK and original- Hands may be original Crown is Super Oyster which is correct Julian

4 March 2020, 09:23 PM	#6
R.W.T. "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Central Texas Posts: 2,004	The rotor mechanism didn't come on that base movement. That is a rare factory GOLD PLATED 645 rotor mechanism with 7 jewels instead of the traditional 2 or 2 hardened steel bushings. The movement should ALSO be gold plated if it came with that rotor and it's clearly not. That doesn't really affect anything....it just means your rotor won't wear out. The rotor weight should also be gold plated if it were all born together. The dial I think is refinished. The hands are fine the could have come with that dial.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)