ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 March 2009, 06:27 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 268
|
I will remind you of this when you have to hide your dinner plate size watches in the same place you hid your bell bottoms and parachute pants. Or pictures of yourself with stylishly messy hair.
A fad is a fad. At least the hair cut was cheap! |
27 March 2009, 08:38 AM | #62 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
|
Agree 100% The best selling watch for women made by Rolex will continue to be the 27mm Ladies Datejust and for men will be the 36mm Datejust. Remember the Beach Daytona's made for and geared towards ladies, does that mean all 40mm watches are now ladies watches too?
|
27 March 2009, 08:43 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Watch: Diamond Datejust
Posts: 275
|
I can't see the pic. Can someone repost it?
|
27 March 2009, 03:09 PM | #64 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Clark
Location: California
Posts: 74
|
|
27 March 2009, 03:53 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Eugene
Location: Singapore
Watch: Year 1981 5513
Posts: 125
|
hmm...i wearing a 34mm date...look just fine on my puny wrist...me just not into the big watches fad...just a personal opinion..cheers....
P.S : i am a guy....
__________________
Mini Grail attained: Rolex 5513 Matte Mark2 Dial Card-carrying member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons |
27 March 2009, 04:52 PM | #66 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
That's not a wrist, ya tosser.......that's a bloomin' sledge-hammer!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
27 March 2009, 04:55 PM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
|
I always believed the the 36 mm was a watch that could be for both men and women, heck, even 40 mm watches are for men and women.
If there's one thing I learned about women and watches, its that they definitely look amazing wearing a 36 and 40 mm watch. I have no problem with that too because I don't believe in "gender gaps" with watch sizes. However, its not really true for the other one as if I wore a watch smaller than 30 mm, it would look rediculous on me. THat's an exception.
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial |
27 March 2009, 08:48 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 13
|
I am a man wearing a 36mm SS DJ on my 6.75 inch wrist and I think the watch is quite bulky enough. In fact, I prefer my smaller 41 year old SS DJ. I am horrified that Rolex is launching a bigger DJ -it strikes me as vulgar, crude and over ostentatious. I personally view the move towards ever bigger watches as a daft fad that will pass eventually. Back in the very early days of wrist watches they were small pocket watches modified for wrist wear -we seem to be back to watches of that size again and IMHO they look ridiculous. What ever happened to understated elegant style?
|
28 March 2009, 02:18 AM | #69 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 268
|
Quote:
That being said I am glad everyone here enjoys their big watches. To each their own and all that. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.