The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 September 2020, 08:21 PM   #31
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Fine-tuning. Start with more. A little off here. Little there. Viola! New Sub.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2020, 09:12 PM   #32
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,759
The fat lugs maxi case has been the biggest design success Rolex has ever implemented. Never before as with this model have we seen such a craze on sport models of any watch brand in the world.

What a mistake to change it to the new 41 fat slim lugs
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2020, 09:19 PM   #33
Token74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
I’ve never been a fan of the fat lugs, but the Sub was a huge hit so don’t think Rolex are trying to cover anything up.

The new lug size gives a much better look, and the 41mm diameter size probably suits the overall dimensions of the watch better, giving a more balanced look overall.

I’m not in the market for a Sub, but I think they’ve improved it significantly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count.

Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune
Token74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2020, 09:47 PM   #34
BroncoOne
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psmith View Post
No they didn't - the previous case was unchanged for 12 successful years. The 41mm is an all-new design, harmonising with the SD and DSSD.
Nothing new about different case shapes and maxi-dials. Some vintage Subs had these, as did the 5-digit LV. Some early Subs were 37mm with Explorer-type dials and no crown guards. I'm not sure what people are attempting to 'prove' here. Different generations of Subs are quite different, yet retain instantly recognisable characteristics. Some people prefer particular references, some like them all - no need for divisiveness.
Agreed. It's a dive watch, not a dress watch. It's not supposed to look "elegant." If you want elegant, look for a gold JLC UltraThin on a leather strap or one of the hundreds of other dress watch choices out there.

That said, I like the looks of the new sub but I love the 40mm that I currently own, too. I haven't had the new one on wrist yet but I'm betting I'd be hard pressed to see or feel a difference.
BroncoOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2020, 10:05 PM   #35
Sprezzatura!,
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: South
Posts: 841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Likestheshiny View Post
The fat lugs were sold out everywhere and desperate buyers were paying a premium over MSRP. Do you really think Rolex viewed them as a shameful problem that needed a stealthy fix?
Sprezzatura!, is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2020, 10:16 PM   #36
Xenon
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,136
The last decade Sub was a success because of the improved bracelet and ceramic bezel, not because of the fat lugs. The last decade Sub was a success despite the fat lugs. The fat lugs created a boxy look much different from all previous classic Subs. Take away the fat lugs and it's the same watch just with classic Sub proportions and it will outsell the last Sub because of the improved looks.
Xenon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2020, 10:19 PM   #37
James444
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex n Tudor
Posts: 507
Side by side comparison take ur time to watch
https://youtu.be/kdTQdo8AAno
James444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2020, 10:20 PM   #38
JRell
"TRF" Member
 
JRell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 7,084
Splitting hairs. Nice small improvements.
JRell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2020, 03:35 AM   #39
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Anything Submariner would do ok. Let's be honest. The black bezel with the numbers and glass eyething.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.