ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 September 2020, 08:21 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
Fine-tuning. Start with more. A little off here. Little there. Viola! New Sub.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
3 September 2020, 09:12 PM | #32 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,759
|
The fat lugs maxi case has been the biggest design success Rolex has ever implemented. Never before as with this model have we seen such a craze on sport models of any watch brand in the world.
What a mistake to change it to the new 41 fat slim lugs
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
3 September 2020, 09:19 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
I’ve never been a fan of the fat lugs, but the Sub was a huge hit so don’t think Rolex are trying to cover anything up.
The new lug size gives a much better look, and the 41mm diameter size probably suits the overall dimensions of the watch better, giving a more balanced look overall. I’m not in the market for a Sub, but I think they’ve improved it significantly. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
3 September 2020, 09:47 PM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,335
|
Quote:
That said, I like the looks of the new sub but I love the 40mm that I currently own, too. I haven't had the new one on wrist yet but I'm betting I'd be hard pressed to see or feel a difference. |
|
3 September 2020, 10:05 PM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: South
Posts: 841
|
|
3 September 2020, 10:16 PM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,136
|
The last decade Sub was a success because of the improved bracelet and ceramic bezel, not because of the fat lugs. The last decade Sub was a success despite the fat lugs. The fat lugs created a boxy look much different from all previous classic Subs. Take away the fat lugs and it's the same watch just with classic Sub proportions and it will outsell the last Sub because of the improved looks.
|
3 September 2020, 10:19 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex n Tudor
Posts: 507
|
Side by side comparison take ur time to watch
https://youtu.be/kdTQdo8AAno |
3 September 2020, 10:20 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 7,084
|
Splitting hairs. Nice small improvements.
|
4 September 2020, 03:35 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
Anything Submariner would do ok. Let's be honest. The black bezel with the numbers and glass eyething.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.