ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 February 2021, 03:13 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 1
|
About my 5513 watch
I bought my Rolex 5513 in 1969 at a shop in St Thomas, Virgin Island. I have worn it on my wrist every day through thick and thin. Last year it developed a small leak in the lens, allowing moisture into the innards of the watch. I put it in a sealed jar of white rice. Eventually I saved up the money to have it repaired. I sent it to a duly authorized Rolex service center in Dallas.
They sent me a estimate for the cost of repairs. They said the case was so badly deteriorated that it could not be repaired. They offered to replace the case, cover and crystal for a price. They would do necessary repairs and service to the movement. I agreed to the repairs and also purchased a new Rolex bracelet to go with it. The price was slightly above $6,000.00. Now to my real question. Having had all the outward parts of the watch replaced, is the collectable value of a ancient 5513 reduced? The repair man said some of the needed parts were not available so he used a different dial using the numbers first dial. Is it still able to be described as an antique 5513? I wore this all through my time in Vietnam, minus the bracelet, but with a Navy issue strap on it. I usually wore it under my sock on my ankle to make sure it was not stolen along the way. When I came back to the world, it went back on my wrist. Aside for the time it was being repaired and serviced every 5 years, that is where it was. So, does anyone have any advice to the watch being described accurately as a 5513? |
28 February 2021, 11:00 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Brad
Location: Colorado
Watch: 16613
Posts: 1,263
|
It’s a 5513 with a service case and replacement dial. I think they usually start with 444..
To the collectors the value is less but I think you have a new incarnation of an awesome 5513. Wear and enjoy. |
1 March 2021, 12:34 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
|
Terrible news. I'm really sorry but you very likely destroyed the value of your watch. On the positive side you will have a new daily wearer for many more years.
Inviato dal mio SM-T719 utilizzando Tapatalk |
1 March 2021, 12:53 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,918
|
About my 5513 watch
Thanks for sharing your history with that watch, it is unforgettable for you and independant of vintage value today, wear your 5513 as it is.
Service case, replacement dial decrease value for many here, but I would not care so much, for a 5513 that went with you through Vietnam.... Your story and memories with that watch are priceless. Enjoy it !!! |
1 March 2021, 03:38 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: London
Posts: 526
|
If all those parts were change it wouldn’t be the watch that went through Vietnam with you
Uk members will remember triggers spade It might be worth contacting an independent who could repair the case |
1 March 2021, 05:06 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,528
|
Have the repairs already been completed? I personally would not go through with the repairs unless you are able to keep the original parts afterwards. And this opinion is not based on market value, but rather on what made it "your watch". That case went through one hell of a ride with you, and even if you are no longer able to count on it for waterproof service in a watch (I'd want to verify that with a highly regarded independent watchmaker) I'd want to have it in my drawer, or on a chain around my neck, or something, anything, other than the waste basket at RSC.
|
1 March 2021, 05:17 AM | #7 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Quote:
What you do not have is an "all original" 5513, and so, much like any modern restoration, you have a restoration of "your" 5513. It would definitely be accurately described as a 5513 because that is what it is - restored or not.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
1 March 2021, 06:43 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: "H"
Location: England
Watch: ing Rainclouds
Posts: 1,439
|
photos
Hi Chris, by chance any before and after photos?
__________________
"H" 5513 Submariner 1968 114270 Explorer 2005 Smiths W10 1968 Tissot Seastar 2011 |
10 March 2021, 09:12 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 149
|
I would have done the repairs as well. What’s the value of a deteriorated case? It’s a working tool watch that was no longer fit for its intended purpose. Rolex service got it working again.
|
19 March 2021, 11:33 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Canada
Watch: Bulova Marriage
Posts: 95
|
The original case was beyond repair, and leaking.
If you kept the original case and did not have it repaired, by now you may have a rusty mess inside. And if you continued to love it and wear it, it may be completely beyond repair at this point because you could not keep water from entering even more every day. You did the right thing. You repaired a watch to the point of being able to love it and wear it every day. The cost of replacement was probably more than what you paid for repairs of your loved watch. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.