The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 November 2021, 02:23 AM   #1
deuxani
"TRF" Member
 
deuxani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 353
Where is the IWC Genta Ingenieur?

Some of the most sought after watches today are either Rolexes, Audemars Piquet Royal Oaks and Patek Philippe Nautiluses. The Royal Oak and Nautilus are obviously the creation of the genius watch designer Gerald Genta and his integrated bracelet design watches have inspired many brands in the 70’s and 80’s to also follow the trend.

In this crazy market the Royal Oak and Nautilus are out of reach for most watch enthousiast, so they start shopping elsewhere. Overseas, Octo Finissimo, Laureato, Polo, Alpine Eagle, etc are all integrated bracelet watches that get a lot of attention these days, but they are not designed by Genta! And who does have an original Genta designed integrated bracelet watch from the 70’s? IWC!




So IWC has the Ingenieur, which back then wasn’t a success. But looking at the current market, it could become a game changer for them. The original design might be a bit too round:






And the latest iteration might be a bit too square and too different from the original:






But the 80’s slight redesign would be a nice mix of the original and the modern interpretation.




I would be first in line to get a reissue of the IWC Ingenieur based on Gerald Gentas original design. But what did IWC do? They canceled the Genta design and went back to a very unattractive pre-Genta Intengieur nobody is interested in.

If you look at IWC, they have the Big Pilot and there entire Pilot line up as their main seller. Then the Portugieser line which is quite good looking and pretty well loved. If they would add on top of that the Genta Ingenieur and can create another great line of that like AP and PP did with the Royal Oak and Nautilus, IWC would be selling many more watches over all entire line. The brand would become much more popular and they would sell probably a lot more watches.

But what is IWC doing with this hidden gem? Nothing! It’s so baffling. Maybe they are working on it as we speak (which I hope) as we can see some hints of the original Ingenieur in the new bracelet design for the Portugieser. But IWC…… WHERE IS THE GENTA INGENIEUR?
Attached Images
         
deuxani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2021, 02:31 AM   #2
alllexandru
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
alllexandru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Old continent
Posts: 2,462
If IWC decides to revive this one with in-house caliber im all in, just not in 43 mm cases I hope :D
alllexandru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2021, 02:40 AM   #3
WatchEater666
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,982
I had the 3239 for a bit and loved it. Definitely underrated.
WatchEater666 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2021, 03:31 AM   #4
deuxani
"TRF" Member
 
deuxani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 353
Quote:
Originally Posted by alllexandru View Post
If IWC decides to revive this one with in-house caliber im all in, just not in 43 mm cases I hope :D
The purest of the final version that is discontinued, the IW3239, was 40mm. Looking at IWC’s current downsizing strategy (small Big Pilot, 39mm Spitfire, smaller Pilot Chrono, smaller Portugiesers) I am not worried about the size.


Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchEater666 View Post
I had the 3239 for a bit and loved it. Definitely underrated.
That was a really nice piece. I was very close to buying it, but I just thought the dial was a bit too boring. But I loved the bracelet and the case and the size. Even if they just released that version again without the crown guards and a different dial……
Attached Images
 
deuxani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2021, 05:50 AM   #5
Sandpit
"TRF" Member
 
Sandpit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by alllexandru View Post
If IWC decides to revive this one with in-house caliber im all in, just not in 43 mm cases I hope :D
Such a watch would be a reason I would buy IWC. As it stands though nothing really does anything for me
Sandpit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2021, 06:13 AM   #6
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Agree - revive the Genta version, in the Genta size, with the new(er) manufacture calibre.

However, back to the original premise of the OP: Another one I'd love to see return is the Genta-style Omega Constellation. The tonneau case shape has had some renewed popularity (Hamilton, Cartier, CWC, Timex). With the equally reinvigorated interest in smaller watches, I could see it becoming a big hit.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2021, 11:32 AM   #7
Justindo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: California
Posts: 2,176
While I'm not a fan of Genta designed watches, I agree that Richemont is stupid for not riding this Genta wave with the Ingenieur. A return to the original design with an in house movement would print money for them and I really don't know what they were thinking when they introduced the current generation in 2017.
Justindo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2021, 12:34 PM   #8
thekman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Boston
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,051
I have been wondering about this for a while. Everyone and their mom are releasing sports models with integrated bracelets to cash in on the Genta Hype, meanwhile the one company that actually has a genuine Genta designed watch refuses to cash in. It definitely feels like they are leaving millions in revenue on the table by not riding this hype train. I most definitely would buy an IWC Ingineur if it were faithful to the Gneta design (not whatever they have been producing in the last few years)
__________________
Rolex | AP | Cartier | VC | Lange

Follow me www.instagram.com/subs.n.scrubs
thekman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2021, 12:48 PM   #9
illiguy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
illiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,661
https://www.iwc.com/en/forum/collect...ngenieurs.html
illiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2021, 12:24 AM   #10
deuxani
"TRF" Member
 
deuxani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justindo View Post
While I'm not a fan of Genta designed watches, I agree that Richemont is stupid for not riding this Genta wave with the Ingenieur. A return to the original design with an in house movement would print money for them and I really don't know what they were thinking when they introduced the current generation in 2017.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thekman View Post
I have been wondering about this for a while. Everyone and their mom are releasing sports models with integrated bracelets to cash in on the Genta Hype, meanwhile the one company that actually has a genuine Genta designed watch refuses to cash in. It definitely feels like they are leaving millions in revenue on the table by not riding this hype train. I most definitely would buy an IWC Ingineur if it were faithful to the Gneta design (not whatever they have been producing in the last few years)
This is exactly what I’m thinking. They are leaving soooo much money on the table here, it’s unbelievable. And it could be such a huge brand booster so they would sell a lot of more other models too.
What I feel is that they are probably working on it and they want to do it right instead of hastily creating one to satisfy the market. Let’s hope so :) Maybe Watches & Wonders 2022…
deuxani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2021, 05:26 AM   #11
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
IWC made an amazing Ingenieur with an inhouse movement not so long time ago, unfortunately, it was not well reveived
bondtoys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2021, 05:34 AM   #12
mongrelnomoad
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Here and there...
Posts: 1,902
It's just not a very interesting design. Never has been.

Too simple to fascinate, but also too simple to embellish without looking ridiculous.
mongrelnomoad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2021, 06:10 AM   #13
ts3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongrelnomoad View Post
It's just not a very interesting design. Never has been.

Too simple to fascinate, but also too simple to embellish without looking ridiculous.
Have to agree.

The 1832 also feels very different from Genta's more famous 5402 and 3700. Unlike those the 1832 is around 14mm thick, the bracelet is quite stiff, and the first links don't bend down much. It did not work well on my 6.6 inch wrists.

Accidentally, a buddy wore a 1990s 3521 Ingenieur last weekend which is a lovely 34 x 9mm watch similar to the 500000 A/m variant in the pics above.
ts3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2021, 08:20 PM   #14
deuxani
"TRF" Member
 
deuxani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 353
I would love something like this:



If they don’t make it, I will make it myself
deuxani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2021, 10:31 PM   #15
deuxani
"TRF" Member
 
deuxani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 353
deuxani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2021, 10:58 PM   #16
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,764
I like the IWC and had one a few years ago.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2021, 12:04 AM   #17
Nav01L
"TRF" Member
 
Nav01L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
I‘m told by someone who should know that it’s actually coming back
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland

Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you.
Nav01L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2021, 12:58 AM   #18
deuxani
"TRF" Member
 
deuxani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nav01L View Post
I‘m told by someone who should know that it’s actually coming back
I truly hope so! In the current line up there are dozens of Pilots and Portugiesers, but only 7 Ingenieurs (with a design nobody really wants). So fingers crossed your source is right It is long overdue.
deuxani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2021, 02:47 AM   #19
scarlet knight
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Good ones
Posts: 8,468
Agree with OP.
scarlet knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2021, 09:43 PM   #20
alllexandru
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
alllexandru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Old continent
Posts: 2,462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nav01L View Post
I‘m told by someone who should know that it’s actually coming back

Ok ok this is it! One can only hope and better be in the first quarter of 2022
alllexandru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2021, 11:08 PM   #21
deuxani
"TRF" Member
 
deuxani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 353
Quote:
Originally Posted by alllexandru View Post
Ok ok this is it! One can only hope and better be in the first quarter of 2022
On the 1st of April we will know at Watches & Wonders 2022! If they are releasing a new Ingenieur, which will be their biggest release of the year, it has to be at that event.
deuxani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 November 2021, 01:12 AM   #22
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by bondtoys View Post
IWC made an amazing Ingenieur with an inhouse movement not so long time ago, unfortunately, it was not well reveived
Its size and integrated bracelet made it difficult to fit even a 7in wrist. I tried it numerous times but just couldn't get it to fit right (and this was back when I liked bigger watches).
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2021, 03:40 AM   #23
DGP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 122
Told my AD a few months ago if IWC bring out a retro model of it, to put my name down.
DGP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2022, 08:23 PM   #24
deuxani
"TRF" Member
 
deuxani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 353
Just curious to see if someone heard any rumours or seen any leaks about a new Ingenieur… it’s so quiet!
deuxani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 March 2022, 07:23 PM   #25
deuxani
"TRF" Member
 
deuxani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 353
So last week there was a big article on Hodinkee about the Ingenieur SL and Monochrome wrote about the Big Ingenieur. Also in the podcast of Scottish Watches they mentioned IWC is going to reveal something really nice, but they are under NDA so can’t say more. Many signs and it’s so long overdue. Could it finally be happening……
deuxani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2022, 09:44 AM   #26
nickorette
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Usa/Canada
Posts: 299
Wow I've never seen the original, before what a stunner. It's a shame they still don't produce.

I feel the same way with the VC 222. Original is gorgeous, but not a fan of the new designs
__________________
IWC: PRT Minute Repeater, Pilot 36, Pallweber, Vintage Pilot Tribute, Ingenieur Patek: 5098P, 5738R, 5120G, 5172G, 6119R JLC: Reverso, Duomètre, Polaris Memovox, MUTM Enamel AP: 15202ST Lange: Lange 1, Copper Blue, Richard Lange, 1815 Up/Down Rolex: 116000, 116520, 126655, 124060, 116505, 228238 Panerai: Luminor 676 Omega: Aqua Terra, SM 300, Museum N°10, 321 EW, CK 859 Cartier: Santos M, Tank LC VC: Cornes De Vache, Triple Calendrier, 222, 4300V/120R FPJ: CS LF: Classic Micro Rotor
nickorette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2022, 12:19 AM   #27
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
IWC leans far too hard on their Pilot and Portuguese lines. That's their own fault. I agree completely with your evaluation. While we may not all be fans of the Genta designs, there is clearly a demand out there for them and I think IWC would do well to re-capitalized on it. I think a 41mm chrono and a 39mm time-only offering would be reasonable and fill a niche.

IWC pivoted to making the Ingenieur an online, custom order offering a few years back and you really saw them disappear from ADs as in-stock options. I appreciated their early approach to the "e-boutique" experience, but it just didn't work on a watch that wasn't super popular to begin with.

IWC also underutilizes its Aquatimer line. They really need to establish a consistent design language with their diver. There is no reason it cannot compete with Tudor, Omega, Breitling in this segment of the market. The reason it doesn't is that no one really cares about the Aquatimer. I have always been of the opinion that (like bringing back the Genta design) IWC should go back to the vintage-inspired super compressor case. JLC has had some success with this in their Polaris line. I don't think the Aquatimer will ever truly compete with the more iconic divers on the market, but IWC could do a whole lot more to push these sports watches.

I'd add, there's a ton of rumors that IWC will be updating the Ingenieur line this year. People have been trying to place orders and IWC has reportedly told customers that orders will reopen after April. Let's see what happens.
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2022, 09:28 PM   #28
deuxani
"TRF" Member
 
deuxani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 353
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickorette View Post
Wow I've never seen the original, before what a stunner. It's a shame they still don't produce.

I feel the same way with the VC 222. Original is gorgeous, but not a fan of the new designs
Yeah it’s a real Genta design when you see it next to the original Royal Oak and Nautilus.



I really hope they are going back to this look!

I actually owned the new Overseas 4500V and really loved it. For me personally the 222 looks a bit too dated design wise, but I think that bezel would look better than the current gen bezel.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravager135 View Post
IWC leans far too hard on their Pilot and Portuguese lines. That's their own fault. I agree completely with your evaluation. While we may not all be fans of the Genta designs, there is clearly a demand out there for them and I think IWC would do well to re-capitalized on it. I think a 41mm chrono and a 39mm time-only offering would be reasonable and fill a niche.

IWC pivoted to making the Ingenieur an online, custom order offering a few years back and you really saw them disappear from ADs as in-stock options. I appreciated their early approach to the "e-boutique" experience, but it just didn't work on a watch that wasn't super popular to begin with.

IWC also underutilizes its Aquatimer line. They really need to establish a consistent design language with their diver. There is no reason it cannot compete with Tudor, Omega, Breitling in this segment of the market. The reason it doesn't is that no one really cares about the Aquatimer. I have always been of the opinion that (like bringing back the Genta design) IWC should go back to the vintage-inspired super compressor case. JLC has had some success with this in their Polaris line. I don't think the Aquatimer will ever truly compete with the more iconic divers on the market, but IWC could do a whole lot more to push these sports watches.

I'd add, there's a ton of rumors that IWC will be updating the Ingenieur line this year. People have been trying to place orders and IWC has reportedly told customers that orders will reopen after April. Let's see what happens.
Totally agree with everything you said. It’s not just the Ingenieur but definitely the Aquatimer line too yeah. I would love to see the GST make a comeback:



I’m just reaaaallly curious! Can they make it good looking? Because releasing a new Ingenieur or Aquatimer is one thing, making it attractive is another. One of the reasons why I never bought the Ingenieur is that it didn’t look like an expensive watch. Some people specifically want that, but for me I t was too matte, the polished parts didn’t really shine, the dial was boring and I didn’t like the hands and markers. IWC doesn’t really have watches that feel like luxury finishing and most dials are either matte or sunburst, nothing really special, so I hope they surprise me with the new releases.
deuxani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2022, 12:18 AM   #29
_speedmaster_
"TRF" Member
 
_speedmaster_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by deuxani View Post
…I’m just reaaaallly curious! Can they make it good looking? Because releasing a new Ingenieur or Aquatimer is one thing, making it attractive is another. One of the reasons why I never bought the Ingenieur is that it didn’t look like an expensive watch. Some people specifically want that, but for me I t was too matte, the polished parts didn’t really shine, the dial was boring and I didn’t like the hands and markers. IWC doesn’t really have watches that feel like luxury finishing and most dials are either matte or sunburst, nothing really special, so I hope they surprise me with the new releases.
Honestly, in this market, you could release a watch made of tin and chicken wire and people will buy it if it has an integrated bracelet and blue dial.

On top of that, people will fall on their sword at the alter of Genta. IWC are among the very few brands in the enviable position to have a legitimate Genta design. Them not using it in this market is borderline lunacy.
__________________
Blancpain | Chopard LUC | Grand Seiko/King Seiko | Grönefeld | Laurent Ferrier | Moritz Grossmann | Omega | Trilobe | Urban Jürgensen


instagram.com/ct_watch_guy
_speedmaster_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 March 2022, 03:22 AM   #30
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by deuxani View Post
I’m just reaaaallly curious! Can they make it good looking? Because releasing a new Ingenieur or Aquatimer is one thing, making it attractive is another. One of the reasons why I never bought the Ingenieur is that it didn’t look like an expensive watch. Some people specifically want that, but for me I t was too matte, the polished parts didn’t really shine, the dial was boring and I didn’t like the hands and markers. IWC doesn’t really have watches that feel like luxury finishing and most dials are either matte or sunburst, nothing really special, so I hope they surprise me with the new releases.
Well I think there is an issue here... Aside from the Portuguese, Portofino, and Da Vinci lines, IWC is not really interested in making their watches look "luxury." The Ingenieur and Aquatimer, like the Pilot line, are tool watches. IWC amplifies this sport aesthetic by brushing the cases, using matte dials, and what some would consider very conservative design.

I do agree that the Ingenieur could do better to bridge that tool/luxury divide. We have a luxury design, but a tool purpose. I think IWC took a step in the wrong direction when they oversized the Ingenieur, tied it into collaborations with automakers, etc. So to your point, restraint in sportiness should be considered.

I also don't think that they should try to make it another Royal Oak. It really should be marketed as a strong anti-magnetic, conservative, multi-purpose watch with a beautiful history design language that can equally make it versatile as an Aqua Terra or Datejust would be.

Obviously these are just my opinions. I'm actually holding a spot in my collection open right now to see what we get (if anything) from this particular line when IWC releases their new stuff in the coming weeks.
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.