ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 March 2022, 05:07 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
|
Reliability / Desirability
Been reading through the thread about 32xx movement issues here:
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=786299 As well as other threads, some of which seem to suggest there is no effective fix. It seems pretty common. Doesn't it put you off buying a new Rolex? Seems kind of odd that demand is so high when there is a problem on an decent percentage of pieces. I wouldn't role the dice on a watch with one of these movements, especially when there are so many alternatives. ***I know that it's by no means all watches, but it is too many***
__________________
|
25 March 2022, 05:25 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: TRF
Posts: 2,270
|
Same can be a a I’d about the Tudor GMT but it remains popular.
__________________
16570 | 16710 | 116710 | 116500 76214 | 79090 | 79030 | 79830 |
25 March 2022, 05:36 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: FL
Watch: OP41 Silver
Posts: 1,814
|
Reliability / Desirability
Issues aren’t common. Just a vocal minority. As long as you’re covered by warranty you’re good.
Always a risk buying vintage. My anecdotal evidence is 3 32xx movement watches all running perfectly up to 1.5 years now. Who knows what the future holds. I’m confident they’re fine. Greatly prefer 32xx to 31xx movements or older.
__________________
OP41 Silver, BLNR Jubilee, 70th Anniversary Sub, 16753 Clint Eastwood |
25 March 2022, 05:37 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,940
|
So if you were in the market for GMT and we’re offered a Rolex BLRO/BLNR from your AD you’d pass?
Me personally am not put off by the movement whatsoever. Admittedly I don’t obsess over time keeping like some. I tend to wear a different watch every couple of days, so in my world, I probably wouldn’t notice if a watch was off a few seconds a day That’s not to say it isn’t important to others, but to me, I want a good sturdy, reliable watch and Rolex fits the bill |
25 March 2022, 05:40 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
|
Do you think?
It seems those who work on them are aware. But, I guess you've answered my question about if it puts you off
__________________
|
25 March 2022, 05:42 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
|
I don't think I would be in the market for one. I guess that's what I was asking..
__________________
|
25 March 2022, 05:47 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 7,076
|
Mine have been running close to perfect daily, including my 124060 I got in 2020.
__________________
126710 BLNR Jubilee |
25 March 2022, 05:49 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: TRF
Posts: 2,270
|
I think the percentage of affected 32xx movements is far less than what this forum makes it.
__________________
16570 | 16710 | 116710 | 116500 76214 | 79090 | 79030 | 79830 |
25 March 2022, 05:49 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
|
Quote:
Clearly a number don't though
__________________
|
|
25 March 2022, 11:08 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: MD/NC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,591
|
Regarding how common the issue is, no one can really say other than perhaps Rolex (and even they might not be able to). It could be more common than that thread suggests, or less common--it's a nonprobability sample and relies on self-reporting, which can be wrong.
As it is geared towards those having issues, and one would think those having issues may be much more likely to view/vote in the thread, and this suggests that the percent of those reporting issues in that thread is potentially substantially greater than the percent of watches with the 32xx movements that are having issues. That said, I think what can be stated is that there was or is an issue that was/is at least at a somewhat systematic level that impacted watches spanning several production years and tended to only manifest itself after a year or more of ownership. It doesn't put me off, but I personally have a preference for the 31xx for the current moment in time. |
25 March 2022, 11:16 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,714
|
wouldn't stop me from getting a rolex i want at all. especially if i already have a collection and have to wind watches every few days
|
25 March 2022, 03:33 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
|
Quote:
That makes a lot of sense. It is hard to be sure how big the issue is. I definitely prefer the 31xx movement too though.
__________________
|
|
25 March 2022, 07:20 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: Rollie
Posts: 796
|
I'm waiting for an Explorer 124270 and as far as I can tell, the 3230 (no date) movement seems good.
For other 32xx movements, there's some suggestion that more recent versions may be good too. |
25 March 2022, 07:34 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Home
Watch: Patek Aquanaut
Posts: 837
|
I think there is more out there having problems than we think here. Most buyers do not join watch forums and report they have a problem. Vast majority of 32xx owners with 32xx problems we no nothing about.
|
25 March 2022, 07:38 PM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,745
|
I did role the dice because I wanted that GMT and lost.
In a few years there will be a fix
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
25 March 2022, 07:43 PM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,449
|
Not put off at all. I've owned watches with the new movement since 2018 with zero issues.
I've had no movement issues with any Rolex in over 20 years of collecting. |
25 March 2022, 07:47 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,808
|
Doesn't put me off as I don't track the accuracy of my watches. I just wear them. I'd say 99% of buyers are probably the same.
In any case, my 3235 is under a 5 year warranty. If I notice any significant issues I'll just send it in. |
25 March 2022, 08:02 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Asia
Posts: 53
|
My 126600 was fine for about a year and then suddenly starts losing seconds and even stopped moving.
It was still under warranty, brought the watch to RSC, they mentioned that one of the parts needed to be changed. After that it was fine until now, very accurate in fact. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.