ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
30 October 2022, 05:52 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: US
Posts: 90
|
Good for you.
|
30 October 2022, 07:49 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Watch: GMT
Posts: 3,643
|
Best keep them nice for the next owner.
You don’t want it all scratches, it’ll be worth less - like all those scratched or used polished watches you see for like $6000 less than the factory fresh ones. |
30 October 2022, 11:03 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,400
|
So a series of owners preserving watches for subsequent owners?
Insanity. |
31 October 2022, 12:58 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,609
|
Quote:
Most of the people who actually use them want to preserve them for themselves. They seem happier and more comfortable wearing their watches with this on it. Which should be all that matters. It’s weird that people can’t understand why someone wouldn’t want a beat up watch. If you don’t care fine, but you can’t imagine that there are people who don’t like getting scratches on their watches? It’s not always about the evil “investment mindset.” I think it’s good the OP posted this so people can see what these look like and hear his experience. |
|
31 October 2022, 01:25 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,859
|
Why don't we go the whole 9 yards and just encapsulate the watch like comic collectors do
__________________
1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013 Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016 16234 |
31 October 2022, 02:24 AM | #6 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Budapest, HU
Watch: 17000B, B+W
Posts: 2,368
|
Well, if "don't care" these days means someone dares to wear a watch on his wrist without cover it with some cheap plastic, then this world is truly deserves the destruction.
Quote:
|
|
31 October 2022, 02:53 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: NY
Posts: 107
|
This is the equivalent of wearing a condom forever with your partner so they are pristine for the next person.
|
31 October 2022, 03:23 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 242
|
That's a false equivalent argument "This is the equivalent of wearing a condom forever with your partner so they are pristine for the next person."
It's similar to a case a screen protector for your phone. Or, covering your outdoor furniture in the winter. Amazing how many hypocrites there are on this thread. |
31 October 2022, 03:36 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,609
|
Quote:
And people who have a complete inability to see or understand anything that’s outside of their own worldview. |
|
31 October 2022, 10:27 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Budapest, HU
Watch: 17000B, B+W
Posts: 2,368
|
Well, I have a very simple suggestion. It won't be for everyone, but it probably will be for those who live in constant fear that their things won't stay in perfect condition:
Don't buy or use things you can't afford. If you follow this rule, you will enjoy your life much more. Carped diem! BTW: I've never used film on my phone. What for? These phones will lose their value within a few years anyway. I rather believe that it is not advisable to test the hardness of the ground with a phone too often, while it's considerable to add some oil the file before cleaning the display. In my experience, this is more than enough to keep a phone in good shape as long as you use it. I purchase things to use and enjoy, and not to preserve these in pristine condition for somebody else. |
31 October 2022, 11:04 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Canada
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
I'm sure people don't go around dropping their phones or scratching their screens but accidents happen. In the case of a screen it visually distracts you and detracts from the overall viewing experience when its all scratched up. A screen protector doesn't preserve it for the next person. My car is a 9 yr old BMW that looks mint but has its nicks, scratches and stone chips here and there. The interior however is pristine and I keep it that way using the best cleaning products. Its one of the last of stickshift 335's and I keep it pristine not for anyone else but for myself. I don't like perpetually paying for a car on lease and since I own it and its paid off I keep it looking for fresh. I've got protective film on mine and my wife's watches pictured above. They were our wedding watches and we have no intentions to ever get rid of them but we do enjoy the peace of mind of some protection. Even from something simple as when one of our dog's who is still a young pup but a big dog jumps and greets us, sometimes resting his very abrasive paws on our wrists. There was never a thought of I'm preserving this for someone else in my mind when I put the film on. Your whole theory just sounds so stupid at this point. Sent from my SM-G780G using Tapatalk |
|
31 October 2022, 11:47 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Europe
Posts: 821
|
I use a case protector myself for my phone because it gets handled much differently than a watch and has a huge risk of breaking when being dropped, even from small heights.
I had a phone break from less than a 1 foot drop on a marble counter-top. A 2 week repair and a massive headache of being without my phone for that period. My gf drops her phone almost on a daily basis taking it in/out her pocket or handbag. If not for a protective case we would have to deal with endless repairs or new purchases all the time. That a watch gets hairlines or scratches doesn't ruin the functionality or purpose. I am comfortable with putting scratches on any watch regardless of value. I wear them to beaches, in the sauna, steam room, hot tub, you name it. To me they are watches to wear and enjoy without concern of scratches. Let's be real, unless you carelessly try to bang and scrape your watch on every surface you see, it's still going to look fantastic in a few decades. I don't think anyone would consider putting protective plastic on a $200 watch. So it's probably just a matter of some people getting comfortable with the pricetag. In 10 years, the people that have stickers on today most likely won't still have them on. |
31 October 2022, 11:47 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,609
|
Protective film on my Rolex
Quote:
What in the world? What does being able to afford a watch have to do with wanting to keep scratches off of it? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
31 October 2022, 11:45 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,609
|
I think someone was trying to make the point that if one was buying a watch, all things being equal, most people would pick one with fewer scratches. It was meant to show that there was some value to keeping scratches off a watch.
People’s brains have become so addled by the current watch situation that this reasonable point morphed into “you want to keep it pristine to flip.” At this point I think some people are being willfully obtuse. |
1 November 2022, 01:18 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 242
|
" I'm now very uncomfortable after learning that I'm an idiot for wearing my watches the way people have been doing for hundreds of years"
No one said you were an 'idiot' for doing what you want. That's the whole point, wax your car if you want, use a phone protector if you want, add some scratch protector if you want, cover your outdoor furniture in the winter if you want. The OP was just sharing their opinion and so many follow up posts are so strongly judgemental with comments about "if you can't afford it", etc. Anyone who thinks they are right on this topic....is wrong. |
1 November 2022, 01:50 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Budapest, HU
Watch: 17000B, B+W
Posts: 2,368
|
To be honest, there are more and more topics on TRF these days about "what kind of plastic a watch should be wrapped in". However this was the first one in which this kind of trendism or hysteira went to that level that they told me that I'm careless because I don't care about minor scratches on my watches ;) This offense was brand new for me and therefore I responded. It was my fault, sorry for this.
In sum, as this kind of thinking became a religion, so I'm not interested in it any more |
1 November 2022, 03:28 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,183
|
Hard pass !
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
1 November 2022, 04:52 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Mario
Location: CANADA
Posts: 2,483
|
Quote:
Just get a plastic swatch. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
♛ DJII 116234 · Submariner 126610LV · Yacht Master 42 226659 ✿ Pelagos 25600TN Ω X-33 Speedmaster Skywalker · 1861 Speedmaster Modsukoshi · SMP 2254.50 · SMP 2230.50 NAC · Seamaster 300 166.0324 · Genève 162.037 Seiko SLA033 Willard · SKX007 |
|
1 November 2022, 06:18 AM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: El Cerrito, CA
Posts: 2,237
|
You mean I shouldn't do this? LOL. Alright you guys are taking this way too seriously. Happy Halloween!
Sent from my SM-G973U1 using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.