ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Roddypeepa · 2 August 2023, 07:14 AM

I think it feels great in the hand and I’m led
To believe it’s marginally less reactive in salt/ acids. Rolex watches are extremely “feely” when you hold and play with them - even the wife has noticed that.

However, whether it’s “better” is debatable. To me it loos different from 316 but that might be the products in the hand ie Omega vs Rolex.

I bet that I could not tell with two blocks of steel face to face in the ‘raw’ state.

To my limited experience “Oystersteel”scratches more easily than 316 but it’s hard when there are not two identical models available apart from their steel to test. Either seems to work.

“Oystersteel” is feely but is it the finishing?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

2 August 2023, 07:14 AM	#21
Roddypeepa "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2019 Real Name: Mark Location: Southern England Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast Posts: 1,688	I think it feels great in the hand and I’m led To believe it’s marginally less reactive in salt/ acids. Rolex watches are extremely “feely” when you hold and play with them - even the wife has noticed that. However, whether it’s “better” is debatable. To me it loos different from 316 but that might be the products in the hand ie Omega vs Rolex. I bet that I could not tell with two blocks of steel face to face in the ‘raw’ state. To my limited experience “Oystersteel”scratches more easily than 316 but it’s hard when there are not two identical models available apart from their steel to test. Either seems to work. “Oystersteel” is feely but is it the finishing? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)