Quote:
Originally Posted by gretch6364
Not directly this at anyone in particular...but sometimes the obsession with "hand finishing" gets a bit over the top. The reality is (IMHO) many times machines can do a better job on certain parts.
I get that it takes more labor for each watch to do it by hand and that adds cost/value to the piece...but some of these machines also cost millions of dollars, which does the same thing.
Additionally...that hand tool used do the work is just that...a tool. If a tool is electrified and then controlled by hand...how is that different from a quality standpoint?
I feel it should be about consistency, beauty, precision, accuracy, sharpness...what ever you want to call it. I can hand make an entire watch with just my hands, fire and some rocks. It would suck and likely not work...but still.
|
You're right. But do not forget that tradition, and therefore handwork, is a plus in fine watchmaking. For that reason, the time dedicated to finishing a caliber is valued, even only in the romantic aspect of it. Just my 2 cents.