|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: More watches vs More complications | |||
| More is better |
   
|
10 | 34.48% |
| Complicated is better |
  
|
19 | 65.52% |
| Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
24 March 2024, 05:52 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 71
|
More watches or more complications?
If a whole watch is worth much more than the sum of its parts, is one wearable complicated AP worth more than two simpler AP's? Or would forum members prefer going with two simpler AP's? Comments and votes welcome.
I have also posted this question in the Patek forum to see if preferences there differ 
|
|
|
|
24 March 2024, 06:06 PM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Oceanside (CA)
Posts: 730
|
It depends if you like complications or variety.
__________________
Rolex 124060 No Date AP 15510ST (Blue) AP 26240OR (Black) |
|
|
|
|
25 March 2024, 12:08 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: ---
Posts: 703
|
I like complications. Together with that comes that most likely the more complicated the warch is, the less you will see others with it. I like that also.
|
|
|
|
|
25 March 2024, 12:16 AM
|
#4 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: this
Posts: 1,286
|
Complicated question. :-)
|
|
|
|
|
25 March 2024, 02:44 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Europe
Watch: AP & Rolex
Posts: 1,525
|
An RD#4 for 1.5M or several watches with less number of complications (QP, Tourbillon, Chronograph, MR, Skeleton) ?
I'd rather got for variety. |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
