The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 June 2024, 11:21 PM   #1
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
<<< 14060 Submariner >>>

Good morning folks,

Just passing the time (ok, maybe vaguely interested) by looking at this reference and trying to gain some insights from the community here:

What are the differences between a 14060m from 2003 vs 2011 besides the COSC movement / dial text and hairspring?

I believe the 14060 never had SEL’s?

Did both have sapphire crystals? Any other differences?

I’m looking at two listings both with box and papers, full sets, similar condition.

brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2024, 11:25 PM   #2
illiguy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
illiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,662
I think you about nailed it. I personally would go for best condition, but bonus points to later run 14060Ms. G Serial and Random Serials would be the “last of the best” and have the parachrom blue hairspring.

Pound for pound, I think the 14060M is one of the best references Rolex ever produced. It is as close to a perfect hybrid of vintage cool and modern tech.

Hope this helps motivate you to go beyond looking to pass time and buying to put on wrist!
illiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2024, 11:25 PM   #3
Scottyboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: UK
Watch: GP Laureato
Posts: 297
I found this video to be quite useful when looking at the differences between Submariner models.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lyj9Rj-yH0Y
Scottyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 12:20 AM   #4
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by illiguy View Post
I think you about nailed it. I personally would go for best condition, but bonus points to later run 14060Ms. G Serial and Random Serials would be the “last of the best” and have the parachrom blue hairspring.

Pound for pound, I think the 14060M is one of the best references Rolex ever produced. It is as close to a perfect hybrid of vintage cool and modern tech.

Hope this helps motivate you to go beyond looking to pass time and buying to put on wrist!
Thank you for confirming … I just wanted to make sure I’m not kissing anything obvious

I’ve always been intrigued by the two liner for it’s cleaner looking dial

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottyboy View Post
I found this video to be quite useful when looking at the differences between Submariner models.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lyj9Rj-yH0Y
Thanks very much for the video, appreciate it. Adrian is one of the reviewers I appreciate most and this was an informative video
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 12:59 AM   #5
KatGirl
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KatGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottyboy View Post
I found this video to be quite useful when looking at the differences between Submariner models.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lyj9Rj-yH0Y

I particularly like to watch his vids, no matter the content.

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
KatGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 01:12 AM   #6
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
Question for everyone ….

Is this article by Fratello inaccurate?

If you go the the paragraph ending in “has still got it” they say that it has solid end links. Perhaps they are talking about his 2011 specifically? I thought I read somewhere here that the case of the 14060 wouldn’t accept solid end links….

https://www.fratellowatches.com/ten-...x-to-buy/#gref
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 01:22 AM   #7
illiguy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
illiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,662
It’s accurate, and can see potential for confusion. Author states the 14060M … “eschewed” (avoided) more modern features like SELs, non-pierced lugs, and ceramic.

Cheers!
illiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 01:31 AM   #8
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by illiguy View Post
It’s accurate, and can see potential for confusion. Author states the 14060M … “eschewed” (avoided) more modern features like SELs, non-pierced lugs, and ceramic.

Cheers!


My goodness, I must’ve read that sentence 10 times

Thank you my friend, for kindly for pointing out the obvious
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 01:44 AM   #9
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by illiguy View Post
It’s accurate, and can see potential for confusion. Author states the 14060M … “eschewed” (avoided) more modern features like SELs, non-pierced lugs, and ceramic.

Cheers!
Another question for you …

Do you what year they switched over to the new box from those older charming wood boxes?
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 01:51 AM   #10
illiguy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
illiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Another question for you …

Do you what year they switched over to the new box from those older charming wood boxes?

I think about c. 2005. This is also when Rolex did away with the anchor.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
illiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 01:53 AM   #11
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by illiguy View Post
I think about c. 2005. This is also when Rolex did away with the anchor.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Thank you again! I think that’s all for now. I truly appreciate your insights and sharing your knowledge here.

I hope others find it interesting and informative as well


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 01:58 AM   #12
nyc2la
"TRF" Member
 
nyc2la's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,424
&lt;&lt;&lt; 14060 Submariner &gt;&gt;&gt;

Can’t wait for the incoming! I love finding well cared for 5-digits. And the 14060 has long been one I’ve wanted but haven’t yet. Perhaps in due time, but more importantly, this thread has been super helpful, indeed. Thanks!
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE
nyc2la is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 01:59 AM   #13
illiguy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
illiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,662
&lt;&lt;&lt; 14060 Submariner &gt;&gt;&gt;

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Thank you again! I think that’s all for now. I truly appreciate your insights and sharing your knowledge here.

I hope others find it interesting and informative as well


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Happy to help! Been there before, and helps vet for illogicals (e.g., seller claiming everything is all original as from the AD at time of purchase when they have mismatched boxes or an anchor with a 2010 COSC 14060M).

Some also are completionists, and sticklers for having period correct bits.

Good luck on your search!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
illiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 02:00 AM   #14
Scottyboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: UK
Watch: GP Laureato
Posts: 297
Quote:
Originally Posted by KatGirl View Post
I particularly like to watch his vids, no matter the content.

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Kat!

Even I can admit as a happily married man with a lovely family, he's not a bad looking chap!
Scottyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 02:20 AM   #15
Rick_Nashville
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Rick_Nashville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Good morning folks, just passing the time (ok, maybe vaguely interested) by looking at this reference and trying to gain some insights from the community here. I’m looking at two listings both with box and papers, full sets, similar condition.
Hope you are able to find one! It's a great watch. I owned a random serial 14060m for about 6 years. I only moved it due to retirement & watch consolidation. Thankfully, I was able to hold onto my 5-digit SD 16600, which is basically a 14060 plus a date and additional depth capability. But the 14060 is an absolutely charming piece and thinner than both the 16600 and 16610. This is my random serial 14060m during the time that I owned it.
Rick_Nashville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 02:38 AM   #16
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick_Nashville View Post
Hope you are able to find one! It's a great watch. I owned a random serial 14060m for about 6 years. I only moved it due to retirement & watch consolidation. Thankfully, I was able to hold onto my 5-digit SD 16600, which is basically a 14060 plus a date and additional depth capability. But the 14060 is an absolutely charming piece and thinner than both the 16600 and 16610. This is my random serial 14060m during the time that I owned it.

Very nice looks perfect on you


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 03:15 AM   #17
Dr. Robert
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,297
Get the 2 liner!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 03:21 AM   #18
Jackie Daytona
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Jackie Daytona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Brian
Location: Nashville
Watch: 16750
Posts: 6,626
They are great ones! If you are admiring the 2 liner go for it. I’ve always loved those as well, but I think if I go back to 5 digit diver it will be a 16600. The 14060 I’m sure is a much better wearer though. As a sucker for old Bond movies I’ve always wanted one, but I think I’m my own worst enemy on that one. Lol
__________________
16750 | 6516(wife’s) | 126334 | 16570 | SBGA413 | SRPE33 | 126610LV
Jackie Daytona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 04:08 AM   #19
rmagoo57
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
rmagoo57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Ron
Location: Detroitish
Watch: GMT II/Sub/Exp II
Posts: 2,560
The 4 liners also have the engraved rehaut. Both are great. Try to find one in original condition and you won’t be disappointed!
rmagoo57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:07 AM   #20
csaltphoto
"TRF" Member
 
csaltphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,429
I've worn mine everyday for over 5 years. You really can't go wrong. Classic design and so comfortable. Oddly enough, being a little more understated than the 6 digits also makes it a little more "dressy" if that is the right way to think about it. So a bit more versatile. The chunkier/shinier aspect of the 6 digits makes them a little more sporty.
csaltphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 05:53 AM   #21
Kevin of Larchmont
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,400
I have a two-line 14060m, “battered” as Adrian says, that is my knockaround weekend watch. Bought it right, not a treasure but wears its history with dignity. I enjoy the vintage vibe of the two lines, unengraved rehaut and lug holes and the Luminova still glows. Have considered trading up with it but never have. Its nice to have a Rolex around that I can wear for tasks without worrying about. Its here to stay.
Kevin of Larchmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 06:05 AM   #22
Easy Rhino
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Now Tennessee
Watch: 2-Line Sub & DJ41
Posts: 413
I've worn my 14060M every single day since gifted by wife in 2005 in all conditions, locations, and environments until earlier this month when I acquired a second Rolex, in effect retiring it to one half full time duty as I swap these two out every other day or so. I've never tired of my two line no date sub - wearing it with as much joy and enthusiasm today as any day - but I needed more than one heirloom watch so I can be fair to our sons someday. I'll never stop wearing it until my heart no longer beats in my chest.
Easy Rhino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 06:07 AM   #23
Easy Rhino
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Now Tennessee
Watch: 2-Line Sub & DJ41
Posts: 413
Quote:
Originally Posted by illiguy View Post
I think about c. 2005. This is also when Rolex did away with the anchor.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
My 14060M Sub was provided with the newer non-wood box and no anchor in October 2005.
Easy Rhino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 06:24 AM   #24
White Collar Boy
2024 Pledge Member
 
White Collar Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Real Name: Matt
Location: .
Watch: PAM111
Posts: 2,865
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
I hope others find it interesting and informative as well
Yes, thanks for the information illiguy (and link Scottyboy), and the good questions Brian.
White Collar Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 06:54 AM   #25
NachoNeal
"TRF" Member
 
NachoNeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Neal
Location: Point Loma
Watch: ing the river flow
Posts: 2,856
[IMG]rolex by Nacho Neal, on Flickr[/IMG]
__________________
.
Sub No Date (14060); Tudor Ranger; Explorer (124270); Day Date (18238) stolen by wife; CasiOak.
NachoNeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 06:58 AM   #26
rohada
"TRF" Member
 
rohada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: NC
Posts: 412
I posted earlier on another thread concerning the 5 digit Sub.

Over the past few months, the 5 digit Sub and Explorer II have been speaking to me. So, I bought a 2001 14060M with (what I understand to be) the updated COSC (though not tested as such at the time) movement. If I'm wrong, someone will correct me. I'm drawn by the functional tool watch aesthetic of the two line Sub and the turn of the century Explorer II. Visible lug holes, smaller dial indices (smaller than my Pepsi), visible adjustment holes on the clasp, aluminum bezel, two lines of text, and utilitarian integration of the fliplock have drawn me in. I like the more mechanical, simplified look of the design. The 14060M is a very clean and refined looking watch for those looking for something old school. Very comfortable. Currently eyeing an Explorer II from the same era. Tried one on today and it fits in a similar fashion as my 14060M.

I love the overall refinement and luxury look of my more modern Rolex watches, but this is a nice change of pace. Enjoy, I know I will.
__________________
♛Explorer II 16570 | ♛Submariner 14060M | ♛SDDS 116660 | ♛GMT Master II 126710BLRO | ♛Daytona 116503
rohada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 07:15 AM   #27
PepsiBezel
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
PepsiBezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,212
I tried on a 14060M today as well - they are so nice!

One additional difference, a 14060M circa 2002 “should” have a flat four on the 40 of its bezel insert. A 2011 would have a pointed 4.

A 2011 should have a short “f” in FT (circa 2007-8 the first 4-liners had a “long good F” (LGF)” dial.

A 2002 2-liner would have the long F in FT.

Good luck!
PepsiBezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 07:24 AM   #28
Kevin of Larchmont
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,400
Mine.
Attached Images
         
Kevin of Larchmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 07:28 AM   #29
Gerry62
"TRF" Member
 
Gerry62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy EU
Watch: Rolex Panerai
Posts: 7,505
January 2010 my first ever purchase, new Serial V



then years later Serial U 14060 cal 3000 no cosc only swiss





today ser Z



the 14060 all always pierced lugs have no SEL

Brian I share the most beautiful submariner ever
Gerry62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 June 2024, 09:54 AM   #30
Apdl
"TRF" Member
 
Apdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lakeville, MN
Watch: 126610LN Finally!
Posts: 415
IMO, the 4 liner with ROLEX engraving is the one to get
Apdl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.