The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 October 2009, 01:25 PM   #1
JediRolex
"TRF" Member
 
JediRolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Derek
Location: Chicago
Watch: 114060
Posts: 447
New Ceramic Sub, What happens to the No Date?

Just Curious, I am sure it has been discussed on this site. What happens to the sub ND when the new ceramic comes out. Discontinued? Face-Lift? Nothing?

Bye Bye Lug Holes? Bye Bye No SEL?

Can anyone share any insight on the future of the 14060m?
JediRolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 02:03 PM   #2
STEELINOX
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
STEELINOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,021
I hope that it will remain as it is now.
__________________

*Positive Waves Baby*
Lug Hole Loyalist / Chamfer Line Inspector
INFORTHE WIN
SUB-MAH-REEEN-ER ~ !
STEELINOX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 02:37 PM   #3
nektar
"TRF" Member
 
nektar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by STEELINOX View Post
I hope that it will remain as it is now.
me too..
nektar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 02:53 PM   #4
watchfreak2003
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Jesper Geisler
Location: Cph. Denmark
Posts: 362
I hope it will look like this after Basel 2010 ……. But don’t think so
Not my pic. and forget abut the “Perpetual Date” on the dial

watchfreak2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 03:48 PM   #5
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Cool Jesper!!!

I think you may be close.
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 03:53 PM   #6
galloman
"TRF" Member
 
galloman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Alejandro
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally Posted by STEELINOX View Post
I hope that it will remain as it is now.
me too; It'd be sad to see a true classic die
galloman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 05:58 PM   #7
rolexnovice
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 16610
Posts: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by galloman View Post
me too; It'd be sad to see a true classic die
rolexnovice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 06:57 PM   #8
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
I think it'll remain as it is...only a guess, though. Personally, I hope I'm right because I like it as it is!
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 07:23 PM   #9
Bullyterrier
"TRF" Member
 
Bullyterrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
It isn't in the current catalogue. Not sure what will become of it.
__________________
So Mote it be.
Bullyterrier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 07:41 PM   #10
Gerardus
"TRF" Member
 
Gerardus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
I hope it stays "the classic".
__________________

♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300
Gerardus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 08:27 PM   #11
Doug507
"TRF" Member
 
Doug507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerardus View Post
I hope it stays "the classic".

Absolutely. Messing with it would be the end of the classic Submariner DNA line!
__________________
GMT Master II 16760
Submariner 14060M
Doug507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 11:00 PM   #12
rolexnovice
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 16610
Posts: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerardus View Post
I hope it stays "the classic".
By the way what is "the classic" Rolex Submariner?
rolexnovice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2009, 11:47 PM   #13
Bullyterrier
"TRF" Member
 
Bullyterrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexnovice View Post
By the way what is "the classic" Rolex Submariner?
Take your pick:
Here is the definitions of classic:

clas·sic (kalsik)
adj.
1.
a. Belonging to the highest rank or class.
b. Serving as the established model or standard: a classic example of colonial architecture.
c. Having lasting significance or worth; enduring.
2.
a. Adhering or conforming to established standards and principles: a classic piece of research.
b. Of a well-known type; typical: a classic mistake.
3. Of or characteristic of the literature, art, and culture of ancient Greece and Rome; classical.
4.
a. Formal, refined, and restrained in style.
b. Simple and harmonious; elegant: the classic cut of a suit; the classic lines of a clipper ship.
5. Having historical or literary associations: classic battlefields of the Civil War.


I would say all of those would sum up the classic submariner
__________________
So Mote it be.
Bullyterrier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 12:10 AM   #14
Doug507
"TRF" Member
 
Doug507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 167
To me, "classic" means the original - i.e., no date, original dimensions, original basic design.
__________________
GMT Master II 16760
Submariner 14060M
Doug507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 01:57 AM   #15
Ken Cox
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Ken Cox
Location: Bend, Oregon, USA
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 469
The Rolex no date Sub represents THE classic watch of the ages.
Ken Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 04:12 AM   #16
Bullyterrier
"TRF" Member
 
Bullyterrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullyterrier View Post
Take your pick:
Here is the definitions of classic:

clas·sic (kalsik)
adj.
1.
a. Belonging to the highest rank or class.
b. Serving as the established model or standard: a classic example of colonial architecture.
c. Having lasting significance or worth; enduring.
2.
a. Adhering or conforming to established standards and principles: a classic piece of research.
b. Of a well-known type; typical: a classic mistake.
3. Of or characteristic of the literature, art, and culture of ancient Greece and Rome; classical.
4.
a. Formal, refined, and restrained in style.
b. Simple and harmonious; elegant: the classic cut of a suit; the classic lines of a clipper ship.
5. Having historical or literary associations: classic battlefields of the Civil War.


I would say all of those would sum up the classic submariner
But I feel if Rolex does change the Submariner (or sub non date as some like to call it) then I feel the example of 2b above would be the result "a classic mistake"
__________________
So Mote it be.
Bullyterrier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 08:09 AM   #17
Teofilo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: East Anglia
Watch: 14060M,16710 PEPSI
Posts: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug507 View Post
To me, "classic" means the original - i.e., no date, original dimensions, original basic design.
Like your thinking Doug......and your choice of Rolex pair.......
Teofilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 08:16 AM   #18
Sub'erman
"TRF" Member
 
Sub'erman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: SK
Location: Greenland
Watch: Various SUBs
Posts: 473
Hope it stays unchanged!!

But fear that WF2003's version is close to their ideas....

Regards
SK
Sub'erman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 08:23 AM   #19
nektar
"TRF" Member
 
nektar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,678
hope it will stay the same
nektar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 01:01 PM   #20
rolexnovice
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 16610
Posts: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by nektarios View Post
hope it will stay the same
We shall see....Its going to be an updated classic watch!!!
rolexnovice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 07:20 PM   #21
kzm40
"TRF" Member
 
kzm40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by JediRolex View Post
Just Curious, I am sure it has been discussed on this site. What happens to the sub ND when the new ceramic comes out. Discontinued? Face-Lift? Nothing?

Bye Bye Lug Holes? Bye Bye No SEL?

Can anyone share any insight on the future of the 14060m?
Actually.. No..:) but we can wait and see.. they still do the exp 1 in its original case, and the 1016 (earlier exp 1) was the longest running unchanged model. I imagine it will stay around for a while.
kzm40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 07:29 PM   #22
jameshe
"TRF" Member
 
jameshe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: AP ROC, SkyDweller
Posts: 812
I havent known rolex for a long time, but I would suspect that they will discontinue it/keep producing the current version - NOT update it.

It would be nice that way - like the SD
jameshe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 09:14 PM   #23
staplejj33
"TRF" Member
 
staplejj33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: John Stapleton
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Oris Meistertacher
Posts: 44
i dunno. i'm new to Rolex, but they seem to be making some bold moves. discontinuing "classics", making whole new lines, green bezels, green hands, green CRYTALS, updated clasps, updated movements, updated sizes, updated METALS - i mean, for the world's most widely recognized and "traditional watch", it seems that lately they're going from publicity stunts to a broader clientelle. like my wife says, "they all look the same", but they're doing some really cool stuff technologically so they don't have to make dramatic aesthetic changes...like crown protectors or 48mm dials or exhibition casebacks. so, it would make sense if the updated subs had ceramic bezels and new clasps and maybe an internal tweak just to keep things fresh, but i don't see them DROPPING the no-date.

they should though. :)
staplejj33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 09:19 PM   #24
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
I hope they keep it. Rolex need at least one real Rolex in their line up.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 October 2009, 09:58 PM   #25
eagle_lex
"TRF" Member
 
eagle_lex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Ed
Location: Lexington, Ky
Watch: AP and Rolex
Posts: 541
while i LOVE my ND..... I would LOVE to see rolex continue their updates and do a new ND. its a classic clean look and a more affordable alternative for some people. if they did a clean looking more affordable ND i would definately pick one up to sit along side my current ND.
eagle_lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.