ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

MilgaussMan · 20 January 2010, 10:04 AM

Although it sounds like the Exp II might compliment your current collection . . . I still vote for the Sub!

oh and no date and no COSC!

TimeToGo · 20 January 2010, 10:07 AM

El Clasico - Submarino!

Two different style/weighted watches...

Your decision, whatever it may be, will be just fine!

Adam100 · 22 January 2010, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam100

Hi
I had an Explorer II ten years ago and loved it but now I wear a SD and
I think it has a more sporty look than the Explorer II. The second hand value is much lower than the SD at least here in Sweden.

Good Luck.

Sorry over my wrongspelling it should be DS not SD

Ciao/Adam

Lion · 22 January 2010, 07:41 AM

You have a tough choice to make as all the watches you mentioned are very nice to have. If you plan on eventually having both models then just pick one now and save for the other. I have a GMT Pepsi and a Sub ND and like both of them. My Sub ND is a non-COSC and really like the clean look on the dial. But my everyday watch is my GMT!!!

acce1999 · 22 January 2010, 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rolex Freak

Hello Friends,

I'm contemplating my next Rolex. I was either going to go with the Explorer II (which i previously owned and wish I didn't sell) or the stainless steel Submariner with black face with or without date. Any thoughts?

Thanks in advance.

If you, like me, never dive deeper than 100 meters (I've been down to some 16 meters...) and frequently travels to different time zones get the Explorer II.

If you often dive deeper than 100 meters. Get the Submariner.

If none of the above applies, listen to what the others says... or take the one that looks best to you.

Best,

A

DDG · 22 January 2010, 07:46 AM

It depends on whether you intend to go skin diving, or cave exploring. I'm sure Rolex will not authorize you to use it for any other purpose.

20 January 2010, 10:04 AM	#31
MilgaussMan "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Matt Location: Indiana Watch: 14060M Posts: 138	Although it sounds like the Exp II might compliment your current collection . . . I still vote for the Sub! oh and no date and no COSC! __________________ 116400V 14060M "3 O'Clock Lume Club" - Charter Member Join the group:http://www.rolexforums.com/group.php?groupid=20

22 January 2010, 07:41 AM	#34
Lion "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Leo Location: Midwest Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI Posts: 21,461	You have a tough choice to make as all the watches you mentioned are very nice to have. If you plan on eventually having both models then just pick one now and save for the other. I have a GMT Pepsi and a Sub ND and like both of them. My Sub ND is a non-COSC and really like the clean look on the dial. But my everyday watch is my GMT!!! __________________ SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

20 January 2010, 10:07 AM	#32
TimeToGo 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,736	El Clasico - Submarino! Two different style/weighted watches... Your decision, whatever it may be, will be just fine!

22 January 2010, 07:46 AM	#36
DDG Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Dennis Garrett Location: Land of Oz Watch: Rolex Explorer II Posts: 405	It depends on whether you intend to go skin diving, or cave exploring. I'm sure Rolex will not authorize you to use it for any other purpose.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)