ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 June 2010, 07:48 PM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
|
Boy - you got to carry that weight...
In the final analysis, I think my choice of next Rolex for daily wear is going to come down to the weight. I am a lightweight myself (65kg) and I am thinking I will be very conscious of a heavy watch regardless of how long I wear it.
I have no opportunity to try various models so will ultimately make the choice based on what I think will work. So - I have searched TRF for threads on weight of models with some success but it appears that Subs in particular vary a lot depending upon spec. I know little about Subs but if I bought one it would be a TT black dial of P serial or later. Would I be correct in thinkling that the weight of these is 135g? My other choice is either an Explorer 2 or an Air King. Would the weight for these be around 125g for both? Alternately, can anyone point me to a thread or article that lists weights for the various models. Thanks in anticipation... |
17 June 2010, 12:45 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
Even if you don't read katakana, the weight would be the value in grams.
Hope this helps.
__________________
F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland |
17 June 2010, 12:52 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
|
|
17 June 2010, 01:46 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
Of all the Rolexes I have, the Exp II is the lightest, and very comfortable!
|
17 June 2010, 02:22 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
My 1601 is just right for me.
|
17 June 2010, 02:41 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 444
|
If you can get used to wearing a watch in the first place, a few grams either way in the weight of the watch you choose is neither here nor there.
Fit and how the watch feels on you is probably more important than the mass of the watch. I'd want to try it on before I spend that much money. Good excuse for a trip too. |
17 June 2010, 02:42 AM | #7 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tony Geha
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 51,120
|
I X2 that Dr
__________________
Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active |
17 June 2010, 03:05 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: PA
Watch: SubLV, 1665 Rail
Posts: 1,054
|
Definitely try on the watch. The sub may be lighter, but it has an oversized crown that will hit the back of your hand! Wear with caution!!
|
17 June 2010, 03:39 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 650
|
Check out this thread: http://************/showthread.php?t=11...ghlight=weight
|
17 June 2010, 03:47 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 461
|
Correct me if I am mistaken but Rolex uses two main body styles they use on their watches. One body style is used for the Explorer, DJ, DD and Milgauss. The thicker version is the ones you see on the GMT, Sub, YM and up until recently, the SD.
If weight is the issue, you will want to stick with the lighter and thinner body style that the exp, dj, dd or mil uses.
__________________
PAM 372, PAM 424, PAM 720, PAM 968, AP 15500, 116610LV, 126710BLRO, Sistem51, G-Shock Soon to come: AP 26401 RG, AP 15202OR, Patek 3940G |
17 June 2010, 03:52 AM | #11 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Correction................MOST comfortable!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
17 June 2010, 03:57 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 168
|
Might be time to consider an induction......
|
17 June 2010, 03:59 AM | #13 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
17 June 2010, 04:01 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Alvin
Location: So Cal
Watch: ROLEXES
Posts: 5,390
|
I think most....if not all Rolex is comfortable to wear
__________________
"A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats |
17 June 2010, 04:15 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
IMO the weight should not much of a a factor as much as the proportion on your wrist. In an hour after wearing a 130 gram watch (sub) you won't know your wearing it.
The Airking is 34mm in diameter and weighs 85 grams (3 links removed) according to my cooking scale. Just purchased one for my girfl friend who is small and wanted a bigger watch then the standard 28mm in ladies watches. The Exp II is 115 g, and LV is 130g. Used Airking are the best value as they are usually a full $1K under the explorer and house the same movement. The 14000M in the black dial is really a sharp looking watch.
__________________
|
17 June 2010, 09:21 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,002
|
Call JJ's butcher, he knows how much a Rolex weighs...
__________________
Licensed to kill time. |
17 June 2010, 10:39 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
He's so famous around here, I'm surprised he's not a member of TRF yet.
With all he's gone through, he should be a WIS by now.
__________________
F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland |
18 June 2010, 08:37 PM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
|
Thanks to all who replied. This has been very helpful. I am continuing to compile a Table of Models and weights so may eventually be able to assist other novices.
Thanks Sakuraba - that was the chart I was thinking of. Thanks also to ral for the link. I smiled at springbar's note - my nearest AD is 700km away. No local Rolex stockists. I think you have to actually wear a watch for a while before you can gauge its comfort. I am used to lightweight watches, none of my watches weighs more than 50g, so I am a bit cautious about moving to a much heavier item. To try to gain an idea of what a much heavier watch would feel like I taped a big steel nut to a cheap digital to give it a weight of 135g and wore it for a couple of hours. It felt very pendulum -like and moved around on the wrist a lot. I am thinking that this would be fine for occasional wear but not every day use. Just my taste. |
19 June 2010, 12:03 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
Keep in mind that a Rolex is more balanced than a cheap watch with a lug nut.
I would also look at the Explorer, as well as the Explorer II. If you're comfortable with 34mm, you can't go wrong with an Air King.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
20 June 2010, 08:11 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: V Serial 116710LN
Posts: 284
|
I have read this with interest. I am 65 kilos when "wet through" as the saying goes! LOL
I own and absolutely love my GMT IIc. I wear it every day for between 12 to 17 hours a day. I work in a factory with cigarette machinery and still wear it there! As for the weight, it is perfect. It is not heavy but I know it is there and I love that. I sold my Airking (mistake, another story) and the increase in watch size and weight on my GMT is better and suits me more. I would recommend one! :) |
20 June 2010, 11:52 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Ken
Location: Illinois
Watch: Too many
Posts: 2,870
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.