The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 6 July 2010, 11:25 AM   #17
dukerules
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 681
I have a 312, and I'm a huge fan. The 233 is a bit more special though IMO. It's got a, horologically-speaking, more impressive movement, a nicely domed crystal (which works so well with the 1950 case), and a nicely-executed GMT complication. In addition, it is my impression that the 233 gets a whole lot more respect among the Paneristi set than the 312. All that said, I think the 312 delivers in spades for a watch priced significantly less than the 233. It's incredibly clean, and manages the seconds subdial, the "9" on the dial, and a cyclops-less date. It's extremely versatile, and can be dressed up and down depending on the strap. One drawback, however, is the thickness of the case. I think if you want bang for the buck, the 312, 351, and 359 are Panerai's best offerings in the Luminor range. If you can spend a bit more, the 233 is a stunning piece.
__________________

Instagram: dukerules
dukerules is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.