The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 25 June 2010, 11:02 PM   #31
republik-of-mancunia
"TRF" Member
 
republik-of-mancunia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Manchester, M16
Watch: SS GMT-IIc
Posts: 106
GMT-IIc and a 111 here. From week to week my desire to wear one or the other changes. But, I'll never ditch the 111. Beautiful watch!
republik-of-mancunia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2010, 10:59 AM   #32
andrew79
"TRF" Member
 
andrew79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
Look at this pic.... pretty much sums it up that it goes along really well... my pam 111 and my dad's DJ
Attached Images
 
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera
Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570
Panerai 111 , 232
andrew79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2010, 05:56 PM   #33
sturgeon123456
"TRF" Member
 
sturgeon123456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
Well I just took the plunge. I have enjoy Rolex, Omega and now my first Pam. They are all beautiful in their own way. Very different on the wrist, but wearing the Pam I still getvthat same very special feeling I get when wearing Rolex. I prefer the Pams that have in house movements as I feel this completes the elegance of a watch rather than using eta or valjoux movements.
sturgeon123456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2010, 11:38 PM   #34
theken
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 3,417
Nice to own both brands

My collection consists of three kinds of watches: Modern Rolex, Vintage Rolex and Panerai.
I agree with Mike's comment about the shared history of these brands and I think it results in my rationale for owning both brands.
Making the day to day choice of which brand to wear is the best part of owning both.
Attached Images
       
theken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2010, 11:37 AM   #35
rmcarlton
"TRF" Member
 
rmcarlton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Monty
Location: Georgia
Watch: Sub LV
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ebruner View Post
They go tougher well. As a long time Rolex guy, I eased into PAM with no problems.

-Eddie
x2
__________________
DJ, LV, GV, PAM 25
rmcarlton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2010, 04:09 AM   #36
ersnyder
2024 Pledge Member
 
ersnyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Eric
Location: Long Beach CA USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 4,102
Both complement one another perfectly!


ersnyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2010, 05:09 AM   #37
RRGHOST1
"TRF" Member
 
RRGHOST1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,997
I am warming to a PAM 00297 GMT even though i love Rolex.
RRGHOST1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2010, 05:54 AM   #38
boa2
2024 Pledge Member
 
boa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,940
I've owned both Panerai & Rolex for over 10 years. The ND Sub is IMO one of those rare "perfect" watches.

As is the 243...what an awesome watch!
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other."
boa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2010, 03:02 AM   #39
TheLino
Retired
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 196
I have just recently purchased a PAM 104 and a SubDate and I think, although the panache is greater with the SubDate (with the general public), the PAM 104 is a much more beautiful watch overall.
TheLino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2010, 11:14 AM   #40
mikelprz
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Batman
Posts: 452
Had a PAM 88 GMT. Sold it. Now strictly using and buying Rolex.

However, I may try Panerai again in the near future. Maybe a Radiomir.

Anyway, the story for me..
My Pam 88 always seemed not to keep time properly, or stop. I took it twice to have serviced at Panerai.
Still had the same problem. Got frustrated and sold it.
In addition, since the case is larger, It always seemed to find it's way into banging into things.
The good side of Panerai, was it is a very nice looking watch. Dressed up or dressed down, it is awesome looking. In addition, can easily change the straps.
I thought is was a very cool watch.
But just the frustration of the watch stopping whenever it wanted too, kind of pissed me off.

I will be trying another Panerai later in the future. Maybe I will have better luck.
Maybe a Black Seal Radiomir
mikelprz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2010, 11:30 AM   #41
jms_w
"TRF" Member
 
jms_w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East Coast
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew79 View Post
LOL... i got my panerai after joining TRF as well.... this site is contagious....
Same here, particularly the "For Sale" section. I came from the other side, an Omega and a couple of Rolexes first. I do feel my Rolexes have a more solid build quality but the PAM is more versatile because of strap choices.
__________________
116520|116610LV|116710LN|16613|16233
244
232.30.42|3222.80
A2332212
CFX-200|Riseman|GW-M5610
jms_w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2010, 09:26 PM   #42
niels74
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Siberia,yes it is
Posts: 640
got both brands and love/wear both , i dont see one brand ruling out the other really.. would love to on a vintage Pan with a Rolex calibre :-)
niels74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2010, 09:37 PM   #43
jdH
"TRF" Member
 
jdH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South
Posts: 285
Got the GV and SS daytona. Purchased a Pam 312 few weeks ago and the rest was history!
jdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 July 2010, 04:06 PM   #44
fc3s2k
"TRF" Member
 
fc3s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Barry
Location: california
Watch: OFFICINE PANERAI
Posts: 1,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bugsy View Post
i would describe myself as a panerai guy, i own a 243, and have owned a 88 and 24. before that an omega. i joined TRF out of curiosity AND RESPECT FOR THE BRAND. i find myself very attracted to the sub no date and wonder if there are many PAM owners who also have Rolexs? no flames please i am a fan of both brands, just trying to hear from those who have both, the differences, how owning both happened? just collecting or if both brands are in a rotation? I am intentionally asking here in the PAM forum of TRF.
THANKS....

B
get the sub no date you won't regret it!!!

____________________________
SUB 14060M
Explorer I
SS Datejust WG bezel
RG cellini Danaos
PAM 177i
RG Hublot BB ceramic bezel
fc3s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 July 2010, 06:26 PM   #45
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
I have both PAMs and Rolexes... They complement each other nicely. When I wanted a cleaner slim watch, I go for my rolex. If I want a more casual looking watch with a more rugged look, I'd go for my PAM.

And I don't suspect marinas to be a great dresswatch, but Rolexes like my DJII works very nicely as a dresswatch...

But that's just me though :)
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.