ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

AndersB · 21 July 2010, 05:44 PM

Thanks Tools, I think that could be just it, the diameter of the tube. You wouldn't know the ref number of the 1.8mm bar would you? Although frankly I think even 1.8 could have been too thick. I'll have to try and measure that.

However the end-links are fine (if by end-link we mean the part that sits closest to the watch case). As I tried to describe, it's the dimension of the hole in the part that goes into the end-link, and the spring bar passes through, that caused the issue. I.e. the spring bar passes through this part I'm referring to and the end links. Hope it got clearer. I should have posted a picture of it.

Anyway - as reported the watchmaker could widen the opening using a special tool.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

21 July 2010, 05:44 PM	#1
AndersB "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Europe Posts: 603	Thanks Tools, I think that could be just it, the diameter of the tube. You wouldn't know the ref number of the 1.8mm bar would you? Although frankly I think even 1.8 could have been too thick. I'll have to try and measure that. However the end-links are fine (if by end-link we mean the part that sits closest to the watch case). As I tried to describe, it's the dimension of the hole in the part that goes into the end-link, and the spring bar passes through, that caused the issue. I.e. the spring bar passes through this part I'm referring to and the end links. Hope it got clearer. I should have posted a picture of it. Anyway - as reported the watchmaker could widen the opening using a special tool.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)