The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 18 August 2010, 02:45 AM   #31
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
I don't think it needs to be changed at all....
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2010, 02:57 AM   #32
austinnh
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Philly
Posts: 156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael N Q8 View Post
This trend of making things bigger and bigger is really pointless, I mean where does it stop?
Based on casual observation of the forums, I'd say it stops right about now.

By that I mean I see more posters searching for and desiring smaller watches these days.
austinnh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2010, 03:18 AM   #33
rfknauss
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
rfknauss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Richard
Location: Macungie, PA
Watch: 5513 Sub, LV Sub
Posts: 14,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by STEELINOX View Post
Supercased SUB-TONA ! Bueller, Ferris Bueller !

Thanks,
Randy
__________________


"Few things in life give man as great a pleasure as wearing a Rolex!"

TRF's "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron
rfknauss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2010, 03:51 AM   #34
fusionstorm
"TRF" Member
 
fusionstorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
Increase in case size/diameter? Meh is my opinion. I think the sleek design is more in tune with the "spirit" of what Rolex had in mind when they intro'ed the Daytona to the world.

Updating the design? Absolutely needed IMO. The 116520 is simply way too derivative of the 16520. The only way you can tell the difference with a casual glance is the color of the subdials.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090

Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M
fusionstorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.