New Green Submariner Vs Old...

[djmarcox]

Im new here and trying to decide which one to purchase. I always wanted the green sub and now that Im ready to buy there is the new one available... I would like to know any opinions in the matter... Which one should I go with.. Thanks for any help...

[esm]

depends on how much green you can put up with?
if it is your first Rolex, then a 16610LV (1st gen) would probably be a more verstile option.
BUT - if you love green, then 116610LV is your best bet.

what a lovely "problem" you have

[exxondus]

I love the new green sub. But if its the only rolex that i can have, i wouldnt go for it.

Due to the large amt of green on it, i feel that there is a higher tendency to get bored with it shld it be worn daily. Imo, it has to b worn in rotation.

[MortgageGuy]

Originally Posted by exxondus

I love the new green sub. But if its the only rolex that i can have, i wouldnt go for it.

Due to the large amt of green on it, i feel that there is a higher tendency to get bored with it shld it be worn daily. Imo, it has to b worn in rotation.

I will second that... I have the 16610LV and love it, I also have the 116610LN (Black Ceramic) which I also love. I agree the new green sub would be a bit much for everyday however I have yet to see one in the flesh

Good Luck,

[Art 1]

I have and would rather have the old.

[ingoodtime]

I would rather have the new all green version. It is just
beautiful. Green doesn't go with everything... Or...um...
Does it?

[sakuraba]

As pretty as the LV-C is, it would really be tough to have it as your only watch.

IMHO, for an "only" watch, the older LV with a spare black insert would be tough to beat.

[esm]

OMG!!! Jib speaks the truth!!!

[jldc]

I like the new ceramic LV much better than the older version. The green is just a better color, IMO. However, as you can tell from the comments, both versions have their fans. I also would think twice about making it your only watch.

L

[sakuraba]

Originally Posted by esm

OMG!!! Jib speaks the truth!!!

You're not conceding, green lover, are you?

[esm]

Never!

(fingers crossed :lol)

[MagedMS]

Originally Posted by esm

depends on how much green you can put up with?
if it is your first Rolex, then a 16610LV (1st gen) would probably be a more verstile option.
BUT - if you love green, then 116610LV is your best bet.

what a lovely "problem" you have

X2 Agreed.. 16610LV is a good start..

[relosayrolex]

had the same dilemma about a month ago, i decided to go for the 16610lv since the ceramic is still new and thought of it as a very good choice in the future. just remember, you will never go wrong with any of the two beauties.

[mvagusta]

Is the new Green Sub really classed as an "LV"? or has it just assumed this title by its Green relationship?

I am puzzled to see how Rolex could make an Anniversary/Commemorative watch and then remake it 7 years later but by totally altering the appearance???????

Not trying to sound negative or does Rolex think they will sell it better by calling it an "LV"

Regards

Jake

[petesjag]

Both are obviously great choices. go try them both and decide. I would not buy based on others opinions but it does help to know what others think. I have the LV and have tryed the version as well. I thinks its a bit too muh green for my tastes..you may love it though???
pete

[esm]

Originally Posted by mvagusta

Is the new Green Sub really classed as an "LV"? or has it just assumed this title by its Green relationship?

I am puzzled to see how Rolex could make an Anniversary/Commemorative watch and then remake it 7 years later but by totally altering the appearance???????

Not trying to sound negative or does Rolex think they will sell it better by calling it an "LV"

Regards

Jake

LV stands for "green bezel" in french... so the 116610 ceramic green bezel Sub also has the LV name attached to it.

[dalip]

Old. By a mile.

[Singslinger]

The new green is much nicer in the flesh than in pix. I would go with that because of its appearance and more practical bracelet.

[Watch Fan]

I have the old and have seen and tried on the new. If I had to choose it would be the old for sure.

[djmarcox]

thanks for all your input guys... Im gonna have to think about this a lil longer... I just started considering the black ceramic one as well.. Ill be sure to post pics of what I get...

[rmfnla]

Either one will work as long as you have enough emeralds on it!

[rolexdeepsea]

The new green sub c stand out more!!

[PanosI]

Originally Posted by sakuraba

as pretty as the lv-c is, it would really be tough to have it as your only watch.

Imho, for an "only" watch, the older lv with a spare black insert would be tough to beat.

x2......

[Howie]

My pooch prefers the old LV.

[tifosi]

I have and prefer the "old" LV. If it is you're only Rolex, like it is mine, I'd stay away from too much green. The old bezel insert is just enough. Plus you could source a black insert and change it up at will. Good luck with your decision. There really is no wrong one here.

[EchoBlueUK]

I like the new one but wouldn't buy it unless green was your favourite colour.

[RoleXavier]

Originally Posted by mvagusta

Is the new Green Sub really classed as an "LV"? or has it just assumed this title by its Green relationship?

I am puzzled to see how Rolex could make an Anniversary/Commemorative watch and then remake it 7 years later but by totally altering the appearance???????

Not trying to sound negative or does Rolex think they will sell it better by calling it an "LV"

Regards

Jake

The "LV" stands for Lunette Verte which means "Green Bezel" in french, and has nothing to do with it being an "Anniversary" Submariner, like the 16610LV.

The 116610LV is also called an "LV" just because happens to have a "Green Bezel" around an all "Green Gold Dial"

Hope this helps.

[Michael M.]

I think they should offer the new 116610lv with a black dial and a green bezel.

[Ebruner]

OLD!!!!!!!!!!


-Eddie