ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

watchwatcher · 30 December 2010, 01:25 AM

As others have said, bracelet adjustment is an issue on the Omega...why would you make such an incredible timepiece that does not have micro adjustment capability?

Or, put another way, if you sat around and admired the looks of both pieces, I think they would both be stunning. But, at the end of the day, you're probably going to strap it on and wear it...possibly in different weather/humidity conditions...

Having said that, I have a PO which I dearly love (not the sexy LM version, but still awesome). But, for wearability alone, I would give the nod to the Sub-C and the glidelock clasp.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

30 December 2010, 01:25 AM	#40
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,047	As others have said, bracelet adjustment is an issue on the Omega...why would you make such an incredible timepiece that does not have micro adjustment capability? Or, put another way, if you sat around and admired the looks of both pieces, I think they would both be stunning. But, at the end of the day, you're probably going to strap it on and wear it...possibly in different weather/humidity conditions... Having said that, I have a PO which I dearly love (not the sexy LM version, but still awesome). But, for wearability alone, I would give the nod to the Sub-C and the glidelock clasp.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)