The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 7 May 2011, 02:01 AM   #1
1000sunlight
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: cambridge
Posts: 8
? what is this watch ?

Hi can anyone help here- this Rolex has been in my family for a number of years- I havent had the back off but the numbers on one side of the case are 6480, and on the other 3402** (cant make the last two out but there are definitely two) This seems to date to 1944/45 but if there was a 1 in front it would be 1959. The front says 'Rolex Oyster' and 'Precision', and something like 'swiss 1<25' at the very bottom.
Is it a good one?? Someone said it might be military??
The face is acrylic
Very many thanks
Al
Attached Images
       
1000sunlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 02:16 AM   #2
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
It's probably pretty much what it says it is..

A reference 6480 Oyster Precision.. Likely from about 1957 according to our chart (don't know what chart you are using)

The Swiss T<25 means that the dial is Tritium. It is not military and has the traditional "Explorer 3,6,9" dial, called that because it is usually found on the slightlyl larger 36mm Explorer, although this one may have been redone...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member

Last edited by Tools; 7 May 2011 at 09:54 AM..
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 03:21 AM   #3
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
looks like a nice old rolex.........that someone redialed with an explorer type dial and new fake hands. the watch looks nice, however, the dial likely comes from the depths of china. kinda negatively impacts the value of the watch. so, during this time your family owned it, they never said that they went on ebay and bought a new dial and handset?
harry in montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 04:25 AM   #4
Michael M.
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
Looks like a early rolex oyster with a badly refinished dial.
Michael M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 04:45 AM   #5
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
I'd wear it.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 04:49 AM   #6
model7el
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Jose Antonio
Location: mexico
Watch: GMT
Posts: 49
nice watch
model7el is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 04:51 AM   #7
usbzoso
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Stan
Location: Dallas
Watch: 16610/16600/16800
Posts: 1,231
hands look brand new
usbzoso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 05:03 AM   #8
mjm800
"TRF" Member
 
mjm800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,950
Tale of two threads.

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=175416



This tread is also in the vintage section where the replies say the dial and hands are fake?
__________________
http://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=39890&dateline=128330  1854
mjm800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 05:45 AM   #9
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
After hearing this, I wouldn't wear it. I'd probably cry for a while quietly.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 06:41 AM   #10
major_error
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Oslo
Posts: 15
I would have opened it carefully.
if it is a fake it is not much to loose.... If there are only "some fake parts" it is good to know...

Any way it seems to have some history inside the family. That will give it some "value"!

8-)
major_error is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 08:01 AM   #11
1000sunlight
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: cambridge
Posts: 8
thanks

well thank you for your advice its really helpful. i wonder what the proper dial looked like?
1000sunlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 08:06 AM   #12
1000sunlight
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: cambridge
Posts: 8
thanks everybody- i wonder what the proper dial would have looked like
1000sunlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 09:55 AM   #13
Widows Son
"TRF" Member
 
Widows Son's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hudson Ohio
Posts: 3,564
Hmmmm.....I'm no expert but, the dial doesn't bother me too much but the hands do. If money is a factor, I'd leave the dial alone and replace the hands with something more suitable.
Widows Son is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 10:20 AM   #14
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
thanks everybody- i wonder what the proper dial would have looked like
probably like this... but maybe uglier. hence the dial being tossed;
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f29/195...-a-508160.html
harry in montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2011, 11:24 PM   #15
Rolex2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 164
A 30 or 40 yo Rolex which shows user wear is almost surely real, though the serial and model numbers found between the lugs are critical. This one, if 6 digits, would date to 1945, though I don't know when the 6480 model was introduced.
Someone said 1957. The face looks 1945 military. The numbers and hands on the dial look newer, but maybe not.
Can't always tell from pictures.
Rolex2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2011, 10:13 AM   #16
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
Rolex2, i hear you.... but trust me, rolex never made that dial in the 1940s. or at any time after that . harry
harry in montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2011, 12:12 PM   #17
Rolex2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry in montreal View Post
Rolex2, i hear you.... but trust me, rolex never made that dial in the 1940s. or at any time after that . harry
see rudy_in_berkeley's Explorer watch in the "first vintage watch" section.
Dial looks similar. His is model 1016, from the pic. The 1016 Explorer is the James Bond watch, dating to the 60s.
Rolex2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 12:09 AM   #18
Rolex2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 164
see also thread "Ian Fleming's 1016 Explorer..." in this vintage section. Same dial on widdler 1977's sub.
This one lacks the explorer or submariner logo. Maybe it was a predecessor?
Rolex2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 01:29 AM   #19
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex2 View Post
A 30 or 40 yo Rolex which shows user wear is almost surely real..............
I hope that you don't use this philosophy when buying used Rolex Watches. THAT would get you into trouble.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 04:08 AM   #20
Rolex2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason71 View Post
I hope that you don't use this philosophy when buying used Rolex Watches. THAT would get you into trouble.
one of the factors. Fake ones last about 30 days before they fall apart.
Rolex2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 01:48 PM   #21
harry in montreal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
Rolex2, again, anything is possible.

but, i can assure you that the watch in question could not be farther from a 1016, or a 5500 explorer for that matter. every thing about this dial is wrong compared to a 1016.

i know that are older military dials... but look at the pics of the thing in question. its clearly new. very very little doubt about it. a 70 year old military dial that had mild amounts of radioactive materials tends to age or degrade over 70 years. this thing is spankin' new. i appreciate your enthusiasm and optimism though. harry
harry in montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 09:08 PM   #22
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex2 View Post
one of the factors. Fake ones last about 30 days before they fall apart.
Have you ever shopped for a Red Sub?? There are times where everything is authentic except the dial. Case, bracelet, etc, etc is all correct with the right amount of wear, etc. To make such a broad statement as

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex2 View Post
A 30 or 40 yo Rolex which shows user wear is almost surely real,
is very dangerous. You could really lead people towards purchasing some shady watches making a statement like this IMHO.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 11:16 PM   #23
1000sunlight
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: cambridge
Posts: 8
hands....

I think I will change the hands- who could i get to do this in the UK?
very many thanks
Al
hey- these forums work!!!
1000sunlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2011, 11:46 PM   #24
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex2 View Post
A 30 or 40 yo Rolex which shows user wear is almost surely real
This is the most ridiculous statement I have ever heard in the vintage section.
Frogman4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 01:06 AM   #25
Rolex2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason71 View Post
Have you ever shopped for a Red Sub?? There are times where everything is authentic except the dial. Case, bracelet, etc, etc is all correct with the right amount of wear, etc. To make such a broad statement as



is very dangerous. You could really lead people towards purchasing some shady watches making a statement like this IMHO.
Maybe a case of overinterpretation. I'm merely saying an old used Rolex is more likely to be real vs a new one with no papers.

Fakes, after all, were not as common 40 years ago as they are now. In Asia today, there is a Rolex or Breitling fake at every street corner. And there are very good Swiss fakes.

Because an old Rolex watch has an update that may not be Rolex--or may be from a later period, that doesn't make it a "fake". A fake is a deliberate fake.

In this case, there seems to be a discrepancy between the model no. and the serial no. agewise. That's a puzzle. What does the movement say? You have to get into the watch and explore further.

That dial does look a lot like the Explorer and Submariner dials on watches in other threads, as I've noted.
Rolex2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 01:13 AM   #26
Rolex2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex2 View Post
A 30 or 40 yo Rolex which shows user wear is almost surely real, though the serial and model numbers found between the lugs are critical..
Please do not take my quotes out of context. A couple of you have done so, leaving out the bold part of my statement above.
Rolex2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2011, 11:34 PM   #27
Rolex2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by major_error View Post
I would have opened it carefully.
if it is a fake it is not much to loose.... If there are only "some fake parts" it is good to know...

Any way it seems to have some history inside the family. That will give it some "value"!

8-)
I agree you have to open it. Rolex set their serial numbers back to 6 digits in '53, so this could be a 50s watch. They put a Roman numeral I,II,III or IV on the inside back cover for those watches, to distinguish them from earlier watches with 6 digit serial numbers. You should also take a look at the movement. There should be a caliber number on the movement in a box, and a serial number for the movement. Plus a signature.

These watches require a special tool to open the back, so you have to take it to a jewelers.
Rolex2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 12:07 AM   #28
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex2 View Post
Maybe a case of overinterpretation. I'm merely saying an old used Rolex is more likely to be real vs a new one with no papers.

Fakes, after all, were not as common 40 years ago as they are now. In Asia today, there is a Rolex or Breitling fake at every street corner. And there are very good Swiss fakes.

Because an old Rolex watch has an update that may not be Rolex--or may be from a later period, that doesn't make it a "fake". A fake is a deliberate fake.

In this case, there seems to be a discrepancy between the model no. and the serial no. agewise. That's a puzzle. What does the movement say? You have to get into the watch and explore further.

That dial does look a lot like the Explorer and Submariner dials on watches in other threads, as I've noted.
Evidently you are the expert here. Sorry I questioned your ability to differentiate between what is real and fake. Good luck buying Rolex watches
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 01:10 AM   #29
slcbbrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
working?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1000sunlight View Post
I think I will change the hands- who could i get to do this in the UK?
very many thanks
Al
hey- these forums work!!!
If this watch is working, you don't HAVE to do anything. There is a fair chance that you've got a great watch (any Rolex) that has been "repaired". It isn't unusual for someone to refinish an old Rolex dial or buy a refinished Rolex dial. Hands get replaced, too.

I would let a watch guy open it up. He'll be able to tell you in 2 seconds that it's a Rolex. You can decide if you want to spend the money to service it now or later. After you have the watch in decent working order, you might want to consider a dial or hands change.

Since you know some of the watch's ownership history, I doubt that it's a fake. But it's nice to be sure. Before fooling with the dial or hands, I'd much rather know that whe watch is watertight and lubed.

Last edited by slcbbrown; 11 May 2011 at 01:13 AM.. Reason: spellig
slcbbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2011, 09:19 PM   #30
1000sunlight
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: cambridge
Posts: 8
thanks

cheers for the help lads. I would still like to know what type of hands it should have- maybe I ought to start another thread.
Its a shame that some members try to gain points over eachother though- but quite funny.
Al
1000sunlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.