The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 May 2011, 01:09 AM   #31
slcbbrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
I would also shy away from the diamonds, but it isn't a huge deal. I do believe that buying your watch in "stock" condition is a better idea. You can add a diamond bezel, later, if you still want one. The bezels are available at low cost or very high cost.

If you're looking for a stainless DJ with a white gold bezel, you might be surprised at how sparkly/dressy it already looks.
slcbbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2011, 01:15 AM   #32
ghinghi
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: italy
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
The diamonds are not my thing...I truly think they ruin a Rolex.

How about a more classic choice?

that's a real beauty. I agree with you, leave the diamonds out (especially if you're under 65 yo). I also started with a DJ - very versatile - and then added up some sport models. But if I were young nowadays I probably would start with a sub and add a DJ later.
ghinghi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2011, 01:19 AM   #33
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
TT DJ white face is a on my list for future pick ups. Can't go wrong with this classic.
Best of luck and welcome
__________________
mjclark32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2011, 01:37 AM   #34
kcmo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
Go for it! The DJ is such a classic and versatile piece! You can always get a professional model later on for diversity sake.
kcmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2011, 01:54 AM   #35
Ricco
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Jakarta
Posts: 333
DJ is my first and only now. Saving for a subbie... You cant go wrong. I dont favor the diamonds too...maybe gold for bling..
Ricco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2011, 02:33 AM   #36
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by wat(her View Post
Hi all, new to here. I've been enjoying the read on here. So informative, it's great! I'm wanting to get my very first Rolex. Was thinking about a new SS, DJ, silver dial with diamonds, jubilee, 116234. However, it appears the more popular Rolexes and the ones to hold value are the sport models such as the sub dates like the sub c. I know it comes down to what one likes, but just wanting to hear your thoughts/opinions. It probably won't be a daily wearer. I like the look of both. I'm sure I would end up with another rolex later on, maybe a sub, after getting the bug on here.

I'm borrowing this picture from the web to give an idea. Not buying from the link. Will purchase from one of the trusted TRF sellers on here or AD.

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=...w=1173&bih=597
Hi and welcome to TRF.

While your choice of that particular DJ is truly excellent, you must bear in mind that diamonds do not hold any kind of resale value.................so don't buy it if you're thinking of selling it in the future. It's NOT a good investment.

Your best bet as an onward investment would be the older SS Sub-date 16610 which still seems to be in demand. Trusted TRF sellers here still seem to be advertising them, so perhaps that would be the best way to go.

This is one model you can use for years and then still hope to get a fair return on your initial investment if you wish to ever sell it.

Good luck - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2011, 02:42 AM   #37
R.G
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Posts: 419
Quote:
Originally Posted by LI Matt View Post
The DJ is Rolex's best-selling model. The sport models may be more popular among the sort of person who posts to TRF but out in the world The DJ is the top dog.
True.
R.G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2011, 03:22 AM   #38
The Joker
"TRF" Member
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
I can't agree that the DJ is top dog. Maybe it's a bestseller because they do ladies versions aswell. Maybe it is more popular in other regions. i.e asia

I work in London and since I been looking at watches in the last year, have spotted at least 50 subs, and only 1 DJ. That's no exaggeration.

So I say if you wanna stand out from the crowd, get a DJ!
The Joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2011, 03:54 AM   #39
R.G
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Posts: 419
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bananas View Post
I can't agree that the DJ is top dog. Maybe it's a bestseller because they do ladies versions aswell. Maybe it is more popular in other regions. i.e asia

I work in London and since I been looking at watches in the last year, have spotted at least 50 subs, and only 1 DJ. That's no exaggeration.

So I say if you wanna stand out from the crowd, get a DJ!
Bizarre?! I live and work in London and I often see Subs too, although personally I think I see more DJ's on men. Perhaps it's my line of work or something...
R.G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2011, 04:01 AM   #40
hy12
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: israel
Watch: rolex explII white
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by gqllc View Post
I started with a Datejust and then I got an Explorer II....If I had to do it all over again I would have started with the iconic Sub the 16610....Even though there are a lot of them out there I still think that is the one Rolex to own.
which one do u wear mostly, DJ or EXPII?
hy12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2011, 04:17 AM   #41
ptugolf
"TRF" Member
 
ptugolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Alan
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: SubC Date
Posts: 676
My recent purchase - SS WG Datejust with a white dial, a classic Rolex.
Attached Images
 
ptugolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2011, 04:38 AM   #42
The Joker
"TRF" Member
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.G View Post
Bizarre?! I live and work in London and I often see Subs too, although personally I think I see more DJ's on men. Perhaps it's my line of work or something...
Ha, yeah surprised you say this. Even though I'm amougst the bankers(I'm not one of them) and they all have subs, I would say even away from the city my statement still holds true. Can't work this one out then.
The Joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2011, 05:05 AM   #43
R.G
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Posts: 419
I must be in the wrong part of town...
R.G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2011, 01:54 AM   #44
HORNBLOWER
"TRF" Member
 
HORNBLOWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Ben
Location: Ireland
Watch: 1 OR 2
Posts: 2,640
Diamonds are a GIRLS best friend!
HORNBLOWER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2011, 02:05 AM   #45
East Bay Rider
"TRF" Member
 
East Bay Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,073
For a lot of people, when they think Rolex they think Date Just.
As for the diamonds, sure. It's your dress watch so bling it up if you want. Whatever makes that watch more special to you.
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man
Floating down canal
It doesn't use numbers or moving hands
It always just says "now"
Now you may be thinking that I was had
But this watch is never wrong
And if I have trouble the warranty said
Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On
J. Buffett
Instagram: eastbayrider46
East Bay Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2011, 03:37 AM   #46
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghinghi View Post
that's a real beauty. I agree with you, leave the diamonds out (especially if you're under 65 yo). I also started with a DJ - very versatile - and then added up some sport models. But if I were young nowadays I probably would start with a sub and add a DJ later.
Agreed on leaving the diamonds out...I would add leaving them out completely.

I could never understand how adding small diamonds - which are usually of a lower quality than say what you would buy in a wedding ring - can improve a watch.
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2011, 12:02 PM   #47
wat(her
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 24
Thanks for the welcome, great place here! I agree with all - NO diamonds. I'm in my early 30's. My wife (also new/naive about timepieces like myself) wanted me to get diamonds. She says it makes the Rolex look so much more impressive. But she's not a TRF reader and may not understand. I can see most non-WIS people out there seeing a Rolex with diamonds and be awed. More awed than a non-diamond DJ. But it's not what I'm shooting for.

Well, I have decided to wear the Rolex most of the time. I can't justify leaving it in a winder. So I've narrowed it down to a DJ NON-diamonds :) or a black sub-c

I like the sub-C a lot. Goes well with all kinds of dress. Problem is my freakishly tiny wrist. 5.5" which is holding me back from the sub-C. Anyhow, the DJ 36mm sits nice. The 40mm sub-C gives that "oversized" look. I'll visit a few more AD's to try them on some more, until I'm comfortable choosing one over the other. Hmm decisions, decisions
wat(her is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 02:34 AM   #48
slcbbrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
wrist size

Quote:
Originally Posted by wat(her View Post
Thanks for the welcome, great place here! I agree with all - NO diamonds. I'm in my early 30's. My wife (also new/naive about timepieces like myself) wanted me to get diamonds. She says it makes the Rolex look so much more impressive. But she's not a TRF reader and may not understand. I can see most non-WIS people out there seeing a Rolex with diamonds and be awed. More awed than a non-diamond DJ. But it's not what I'm shooting for.

Well, I have decided to wear the Rolex most of the time. I can't justify leaving it in a winder. So I've narrowed it down to a DJ NON-diamonds :) or a black sub-c

I like the sub-C a lot. Goes well with all kinds of dress. Problem is my freakishly tiny wrist. 5.5" which is holding me back from the sub-C. Anyhow, the DJ 36mm sits nice. The 40mm sub-C gives that "oversized" look. I'll visit a few more AD's to try them on some more, until I'm comfortable choosing one over the other. Hmm decisions, decisions
I wouldn't worry about wrist size-- it just doesn't matter that much. You probably see people with large or small wrists all the time and don't notice their watch size. If you really want a Sub, get it. If you would like a smaller look, you might try the non-ceramic Sub or 14060. I think both wear a bit smaller.
slcbbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2011, 03:48 AM   #49
Duey
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Duey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Duey
Location: Maui
Watch: Too Many To List
Posts: 3,598
Like the watch but I'd leave the diamonds out.
Duey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2011, 03:01 AM   #50
Joeturbo26
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 6
I have that same exact watch you're looking at! It was love at first sight and also my first Rolex, huge milestone in my life... silly but true!
Attached Images
 
Joeturbo26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2011, 05:28 AM   #51
gold canyon
"TRF" Member
 
gold canyon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 1,188
Very beautiful. I love that combination.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blama215 View Post
__________________
Just a Matter of Time
gold canyon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2011, 04:48 AM   #52
JREID
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1
I wanted to say thanks to all of the regular posters here for all of the insight. I have recently put a DJ on a goal list of sorts. I have seen a number of posters mention that leaving the diamonds off was a good thing. However, when I do get to make this purchase, I was intentionally wanting something "flashier" than normal. That's not my usual personality, but this is serving a dual purpose beyond just being awesome.

Anyway, so my question is two-fold, I know that aftermarket anything will cause Rolex to deny servicing and may cause a loss of value. With these two things in mind, how bad of a financial hit should a person expect these considerations to make and how much more difficult would resale and servicing become?

Thanks a bunch.

BTW, here are pics of two DJ's that I like the looks of.
Attached Images
   
JREID is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.