ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Joey_V · 4 July 2011, 08:56 AM

So, all this recent talk about the squarish lugs on the Sub is making me think - how come the GMTIIC does not appear to have as squarish of a lug as the SubC?

I mean, they both share the same maxicase - so why do they appear different?

In my opinion, I think it's because the bezel of the GMTIIC is bigger than the SubC's and this detracts away from the square shoulders it sits on...

... opinions?

SaddleSC · 4 July 2011, 08:58 AM

I wondered this myself. I used to have a GMTIIC that I traded away for the Sub C and the Submariner definitely appears more boxy and squared off.

Fiery · 4 July 2011, 08:59 AM

No, they don't have the same case. The lugs of the Sub-C are slightly wider. The difference is very small, probably between 0.5 and 1 millimeter.

BTW, they have very different bracelet as well: the Sub-C bracelet has GlideLock clasp and a half-link, and it has one more removable link at each end of the bracelet, hence it tapers more agressively.

Joey_V · 4 July 2011, 10:16 AM

Really... the SubC has a different case??

I did not know that. Boy, I'm an idiot.... that's why the SubC looks squarer.

mlotus95 · 4 July 2011, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joey_V

Really... the SubC has a different case??

I did not know that. Boy, I'm an idiot.... that's why the SubC looks squarer.

i was thinking the same thing.

AJMarcus · 4 July 2011, 12:54 PM

Definitely a different case. The Sub C case is resistant to 300 mm as opposed to 100 mm on the GMT IIC. Stands to reason it would have different dimensions just like the classic models. They are really different watches.

Joey_V · 4 July 2011, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AJMarcus

Definitely a different case. The Sub C case is resistant to 300 mm as opposed to 100 mm on the GMT IIC. Stands to reason it would have different dimensions just like the classic models. They are really different watches.

So are we sure they are different cases?

If we are basing it on WR, that may be false. Remember that the water resistance is dependent on the slimmer caseback on the GMTIIC vs on the Sub.

I still need some truly definitive evidence that we have 2 different cases here. I'm still not convinced.

Eric88 · 4 July 2011, 08:53 PM

There was a thread awhile ago where someone posted measurements and photos. Seems like the Sub-C was a mm or so widercat the lugs.

TheDude · 4 July 2011, 09:46 PM

Yeah guys, this topic pops up now and again... and again. :)

There should be plenty of searchable evidence to support what is being said here.

PBW · 4 July 2011, 11:52 PM

The cases are definitely different. The main case of the GMT is slightly higher than the SUB case. In contrast the case back of the SUB is clearly higher due to higher pressure resistance.

4 July 2011, 08:56 AM	#1
Joey_V "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Joey Location: Dallas, TX Watch: SS Sub 16610 M Posts: 3,824	GMTIIC vs SubC - square lugs? So, all this recent talk about the squarish lugs on the Sub is making me think - how come the GMTIIC does not appear to have as squarish of a lug as the SubC? I mean, they both share the same maxicase - so why do they appear different? In my opinion, I think it's because the bezel of the GMTIIC is bigger than the SubC's and this detracts away from the square shoulders it sits on... ... opinions? __________________ Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015 Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD

4 July 2011, 08:58 AM	#2
SaddleSC "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Charles B Location: GMT -7 Watch: Hulk 116610LV Posts: 6,131	I wondered this myself. I used to have a GMTIIC that I traded away for the Sub C and the Submariner definitely appears more boxy and squared off. __________________ Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB

4 July 2011, 08:59 AM	#3
Fiery "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Europe Watch: Sub-C 116610LN Posts: 2,649	No, they don't have the same case. The lugs of the Sub-C are slightly wider. The difference is very small, probably between 0.5 and 1 millimeter. BTW, they have very different bracelet as well: the Sub-C bracelet has GlideLock clasp and a half-link, and it has one more removable link at each end of the bracelet, hence it tapers more agressively. __________________ "In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)

4 July 2011, 10:16 AM	#4
Joey_V "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Joey Location: Dallas, TX Watch: SS Sub 16610 M Posts: 3,824	Really... the SubC has a different case?? I did not know that. Boy, I'm an idiot.... that's why the SubC looks squarer. __________________ Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015 Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

4 July 2011, 12:54 PM	#6
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,238	Definitely a different case. The Sub C case is resistant to 300 mm as opposed to 100 mm on the GMT IIC. Stands to reason it would have different dimensions just like the classic models. They are really different watches.

4 July 2011, 08:53 PM	#8
Eric88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: 88 keys Posts: 2,241	There was a thread awhile ago where someone posted measurements and photos. Seems like the Sub-C was a mm or so widercat the lugs.

4 July 2011, 09:46 PM	#9
TheDude "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: DC Area, USA Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660 Posts: 4,492	Yeah guys, this topic pops up now and again... and again. :) There should be plenty of searchable evidence to support what is being said here.

4 July 2011, 11:52 PM	#10
PBW Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: Peter Location: Germany Posts: 21	The cases are definitely different. The main case of the GMT is slightly higher than the SUB case. In contrast the case back of the SUB is clearly higher due to higher pressure resistance.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)