ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 July 2011, 10:06 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Fastbeat Vs Slowbeat mechanical Movements.
The high-beat vs low-beat argument has been running as long as I've taken an interest in movements (I am talking about watches here) and opinions are still divided.
One of the more highly regarded chronograph movements is still the Zenith "El Primero" running at 36000 bph. So highly regarded as we all know it was used by Rolex in the Daytona.Now the Zenith calibre 3019 was first introduced in 1969 and I'm pretty sure if there were any problems with hi-beat movements, 42 years is long enough for them to manifest themselves. Ulysse Nardin marine chronometers have always been highly regarded but it is a little known fact that for years, they were fitted with a high-beat (36000bph) version of the ETA 2824-2, UN calibre NB11QU. Zodiac produced at least four high-beat movements from 1971-73, all with Albert/Shine ebauche, and fitted to the "SST" models. Longines experimented with calibres 430 to 433 from 1967 but when they introduced twin-barrel movements in 1975, chose to revert back to 28800 bph,and in these days Longines made some excellent in-house movements. Changing the subject slightly, the Longines twin-barrel movements were something I wish had survived in current production,a brilliant movement,but expensive to make. Calibre 890, 892 & 893 had stacked twin barrels whereas calibres 990 to 994 had side-by-side barrels in a movement only 2.95mm thick. The power reserve of 44 hours was respectable but not particularly impressive for a twin-barrel movement, although I'm sure that if R & D had continued on this movement this would have been substantially improved.And would have put many a modern movements to shame,from any manufacturer or brand. Now the main advantages of slower beat rates (18,000 , 19,800 and 21,600 ) are less immediate. Lower power needs allow for softer mainsprings, limiting stress and friction throughout the wheel train, winding train, and the escapement. Service intervals are longer and more flexible, and part wear replacements are negligible.But in general low beat movements will generally not perform as well as a fast-beat one, and while slow beat movements can perform very well it requires more skill and effort from the watchmaker to achieve and Rolex achieved that though the many years, through laborious positional adjustments and high quality movement parts . Now slow-beat is used primarily by manufactures of high-craft movements, most of whom consider today 21,600 BPH to the best.But most of these type of movements being quite delicate and can easily be put out of adjustment by the slightest Mal adjustment like say a small fall or shock. Some of the advantages of fast-beat (28,800 v/h and 36,000 v/h) are obvious: better isochronism, and better performance in both vertical and horizontal positions even with minimal adjustment or no adjustment at all.This is one of the reasons fast-beat has been almost universally adopted by mass-producers.If you think of a how fast a quartz movement beats,while Mechanical watch usually have 28000 to 36000 beats per hour, which is 480 to 600 beats per second (Hz), and therefore cannot compete with quartz watches that have around 4000 to 8000 beats per second (10 times faster).So in theory the mechanical High beat movement should be more accurate,with very little difference in over all power reserve, because they use a much stronger main spring.Now some say there is the possible extra wear factor in the Hi beat movement,but IMO as long as the recommend services are done,there is little or no difference. Now when Rolex's did the modification to the Zenith chronograph, where in addition to reducing the beat rate, they discarded the regulator and installed there own vastly larger Microstella balance wheel,and regulator.And when Zenith would not,or could not, supply the vast quantities Rolex needed, they was forced to design there first ever chrono movement in 2000.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder Last edited by padi56; 9 July 2011 at 01:31 AM.. |
8 July 2011, 10:19 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
Great info, thanks Padi.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
8 July 2011, 10:57 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Yuri
Location: NL
Watch: 14000M, 16570
Posts: 574
|
Quote:
__________________
(Wearing) First Luxury Watch: Seiko Kinetic Arctura 5M42-0E39 & First Rolex: Air King 14000M Black dial (K) & Second Rolex: Explorer II 16570 White dial (V) (Saving for) Grand Seiko SBGH015J1 |
|
8 July 2011, 11:25 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
|
That is very interesting thanks!
|
8 July 2011, 11:45 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: ExhibitionOnly
Location: Earth
Posts: 331
|
I have a 1953 manual wind oyster (cal 710) which is 18000 BPH. Its not COSC but still remains accurate to within 2 seconds a day even after all the years. On the other hand my Blancpain villeret which is 21600 BPH is quite unreliable and can be as much as 12 seconds out in a day. Just goes to show how good Rolex (have always been and) are at making fine movements.
|
9 July 2011, 12:04 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
Thanks for sharing this Padi! Interesting stuff!
|
9 July 2011, 12:06 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 406
|
Great post!
Thanks.
__________________
Breitling Chronomat Evolution 2T, PAM 111, Rolex 116610LV Anniversary, Big Pilot |
9 July 2011, 12:11 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Thats measurement is in Hertz 480- 600 vibrations per second.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
9 July 2011, 12:53 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
Awesome post Padi thanks for taking the time out to share it with us. cheers
|
9 July 2011, 01:23 AM | #10 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
The enemy of accuracy is friction, what percentage of the total oscillating momentum is absorbed by friction, and how much that varies with position, dropping spring-tension, temperature changes, etc. A fast-beat movement uses the higher momentum of the faster oscillating mass to better overcome the effects of friction. The same thing can be done with a larger, higher angular-momentum balance. The speed of the 'beat' has little or nothing to do with accuracy per se, it's all in the difference between the angular momentum and the total, variable friction in the train. A quartz watch maintains high accuracy not because of the fast beat, (32KHz), but because the vibration is not directly connected to the gear train, and thus is unaffected by friction. Instead, an electronic circuit senses the vibration in the quartz crystal, divides it down about 64,000 times, and drives a stepper motor connected to the seconds wheel. As mechanical watch manufacturers find ways to minimize friction, and to minimize variances in friction, such as with materials that have low friction coefficients without lubrication, mechanical watches will continue to improve in accuracy. They already come very close to standard quartz accuracy, and will probably equal it soon. |
|
9 July 2011, 01:54 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Edit: double post
|
9 July 2011, 01:55 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Thanks for the info
|
9 July 2011, 02:00 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: AJ
Location: Oregon
Watch: SUBC, DJII
Posts: 1,827
|
Very informative, thanks!
__________________
|
9 July 2011, 06:54 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Quote:
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
9 July 2011, 06:58 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
|
Quote:
And high-beat movements have a frequency of 8-10 beats per second, not 480 - 600. |
|
9 July 2011, 07:17 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Well as long as its serviced at the correct recommend service interval there is no problem.If there was any sort of like you lubrication problems the movement has been around 40 plus years surely Zenith and ETA would have stopped making them years ago.Yes Rolex did reduce the beat rate but only to fall into there own normal 5 year service.Zenith developed a lubrication system based on molybdenum sulphide for there high beat movements.And they experimented first with a 43,200 a/h movement that ran with the oils they had developed without problems.But when launched in 1969 with the 36000BPH movement and yes it had to be serviced with the Zenith recommend oils.Much like George Daniels Co-Axel escapement that needed precise and correct lubrication if it was not done correctly you had problems same for the El-Primo.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
9 July 2011, 07:56 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
|
well, that's what Zenith says.
Independent watchmakers often refer to lubrification problems for the El-Primeros even with the especially developed oils. |
10 July 2011, 01:51 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Sea
Posts: 1,894
|
Disregarding the technical aspects, there is one huge advantage to more beats per hour, which is aesthetics. The 28.8k simply looks choppy!
|
10 July 2011, 01:56 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
|
Thanks Secret for posting. But somehow none of it went in, so please no one test me on the differences.
Damn you hangover. |
10 July 2011, 02:01 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Earth
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 516
|
|
10 July 2011, 02:25 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
Quote:
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.