The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 August 2011, 12:59 PM   #1
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
Exceeded Expectations: My time with the 5512 and 5513

Until just recently, every Rolex that I had purchased had two things in common. First, they all were stainless steel, and second, they all had a date function. Every time I sign my name at work, I have to date and time my signature. For me having a watch without a date function, just didn't make sense. Well, I must tell you just how much I enjoy wearing these 2 watches. The dials on these watches are so clean and simple. What's not to love? No date function? Who needs the date on the watch when I can remember it in my head, right? With no date wheel there is no need for the cyclops on the crystal as well. The result is a very balanced look to the watch face. Furthermore, with only two lines of print, the 5513 dial looks downright spartan... like a Porsche Speedster with side curtains instead of roll up windows. If the 5512 were a car, I doubt it would even come with seatbelts. Continuing the analogy, just as every Porsche 997 can trace its roots to the 356, every 116610 with maxi case, superluminova dial and hands, white gold surrounds, and ceramic bezel insert can trace its roots to the matte dialed 5512 and 5513. Wearing them makes me think of times past when things were less complicated, where the most important thing was wearing a waterproof watch that could keep track of the elapsed time under water. Other than that not much else mattered. I know I am a little late to appreciate the attributes of these iconic watches, but better late than never. I would be interested to know if anyone else has had their expectations blown away by their vintage purchase.



__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2011, 01:02 PM   #2
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
Very nice, I think I like the 5512 the best.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2011, 01:05 PM   #3
greekbum
"TRF" Member
 
greekbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex GMT 16750
Posts: 8,418
Nice looking watches
__________________
Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas

Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting
greekbum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2011, 01:28 PM   #4
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
Well John if I had that 5512 4 liner I would be happy as well! Love that watch.

I agree when I wear my Tudor 7016 with no date function its quite nice not having to set the date, especially when I wear my DRSD and 1680 3-4 times a month combined. Changing those dates can take 10 minutes!
Frogman4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2011, 01:41 PM   #5
Jagatai
"TRF" Member
 
Jagatai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Philip
Location: NY
Posts: 851
I loved reading your ode to the no date subs!!!

Great examples of the classics you have in your collection.
Jagatai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2011, 07:55 PM   #6
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
Great pair of classic Subs!! Understated Rolex greatness....
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2011, 09:42 PM   #7
bluemartinifan
"TRF" Member
 
bluemartinifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Russ
Location: Dallas Texas
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,124
John, you know I am a 5513 lover.

The Porsche / Rolex comparison is one I use often with friends - who look at my 5513 circa 1967 and can't believe it's 44 yrs old. Both Porsche and Rolex created an initial product design concept and never strayed too far from it. That is RARE for a company to have the guts and vision to stick to their original design concept.
bluemartinifan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 01:38 AM   #8
S52
"TRF" Member
 
S52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: FL230
Watch: me fly-by
Posts: 789
what exactly is the difference between a 5512 and a 5513?
__________________
GMT Master II 16710B BLRO--Sea Dweller 16600--Submariner 1680--Milgauss 116400--Tudor BB58 79030B--Omega Speedmaster Pro--IWC Mark XV Automatic--Breitling Aerospace
S52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 02:06 AM   #9
lupus
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 86
2 lines on the dial :)
lupus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 02:22 AM   #10
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
The 5512 has a chronometer rated movement while the 5513 does not.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 02:37 AM   #11
Dweller of the Sea
"TRF" Member
 
Dweller of the Sea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: EU
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 576
5513 was my first Rolex love, and I still thinks its their best design ever.
I also like that the still can be used today, as they were intended 50 years ago. You need a steamroller to destroy a 5513/12.

If it was good enough for him......




....its good enough for me

Dweller of the Sea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 02:43 AM   #12
Dan2010
"TRF" Member
 
Dan2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
I agree. Though I have the 14060M, all the Submariners are awesome for their simplicity, classic design and their ruggedness. Not having the date makes the dials look perfect.
Dan2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 02:53 AM   #13
Jagatai
"TRF" Member
 
Jagatai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Philip
Location: NY
Posts: 851
I fell in love with the no date sub the moment I tried on a 14060 in person.
I have a small wrist so a 14060 looks like a DSSD on me.

Then I purchased my first vintage, a '66 5512, so pleased with the slimmer profile and it just oozed simplicity , balanced dial and sexy with the lugs slightly tapering towards the bracelet. Superdome crystal knocked me out. After that I lusted after a maxi 5513 and found an excellent example from our very own jedly. It was just what I wanted to complement my patina'd 5512: the insert and dial lightly grayish and the lumes snow white. And the case size is in between the small 5512 and the big 14060.

I now wear the 5513 daily. The 5512 is with Bob Ridley. The 1993 14060 I wear in the rain.
Jagatai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 03:02 AM   #14
hennabav
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jon
Location: New England
Watch: --Rolex--
Posts: 2,391
Congrats John!! It's very nice!!
hennabav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 03:22 AM   #15
skyedog
"TRF" Member
 
skyedog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joey
Location: around the Bay
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,942
Well said John! what a lovely duo you have!

skyedog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 03:25 AM   #16
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dweller of the Sea View Post
5513 was my first Rolex love, and I still thinks its their best design ever.
I also like that the still can be used today, as they were intended 50 years ago. You need a steamroller to destroy a 5513/12.

If it was good enough for him......




....its good enough for me

That is one of the cleanest nicest matte dialed 5513 that I have ever seen.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 03:44 AM   #17
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Love the 5512 four liner. Beautiful!!!
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 04:00 AM   #18
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jagatai View Post
I fell in love with the no date sub the moment I tried on a 14060 in person.
I have a small wrist so a 14060 looks like a DSSD on me.

Then I purchased my first vintage, a '66 5512, so pleased with the slimmer profile and it just oozed simplicity , balanced dial and sexy with the lugs slightly tapering towards the bracelet. Superdome crystal knocked me out. After that I lusted after a maxi 5513 and found an excellent example from our very own jedly. It was just what I wanted to complement my patina'd 5512: the insert and dial lightly grayish and the lumes snow white. And the case size is in between the small 5512 and the big 14060.

I now wear the 5513 daily. The 5512 is with Bob Ridley. The 1993 14060 I wear in the rain.
Sounds like some big No Date Sub Love going on here. I can't wait to see pics of your 5512 when you get it back from Bob.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 04:01 AM   #19
YetiBiker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Vijay
Location: Louisiana, USA
Watch: ..sure, why not?
Posts: 368
Couldn't agree with your sentiments more John. The simplicity of a no date Sub is sublime. It is an understated sophistication that you elicidated well
YetiBiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 04:18 AM   #20
michel33
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: france
Posts: 796
Quote:
Originally Posted by YetiBiker View Post
Couldn't agree with your sentiments more John. The simplicity of a no date Sub is sublime. It is an understated sophistication that you elicidated well
+ 1, these subs are so nice....

michel33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 05:16 AM   #21
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
Now we're talking. Great looking watches. Thanks for posting the pics. Those faded inserts are awesome.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 05:25 AM   #22
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
Non date subs........FABULOUS!!!
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 05:58 AM   #23
Paulie 50
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie 50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 1,000
Great pair of watches, made when Rolex were at their Zenith ( pardon the pun ) I have used this phrase many, many times on this forum; "truly iconic"
Paulie 50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 10:12 AM   #24
cruvon
"TRF" Member
 
cruvon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beaumont Miller II View Post
Until just recently, every Rolex that I had purchased had two things in common. First, they all were stainless steel, and second, they all had a date function. Every time I sign my name at work, I have to date and time my signature. For me having a watch without a date function, just didn't make sense. Well, I must tell you just how much I enjoy wearing these 2 watches. The dials on these watches are so clean and simple. What's not to love? No date function? Who needs the date on the watch when I can remember it in my head, right? With no date wheel there is no need for the cyclops on the crystal as well. The result is a very balanced look to the watch face. Furthermore, with only two lines of print, the 5513 dial looks downright spartan... like a Porsche Speedster with side curtains instead of roll up windows. If the 5512 were a car, I doubt it would even come with seatbelts. Continuing the analogy, just as every Porsche 997 can trace its roots to the 356, every 116610 with maxi case, superluminova dial and hands, white gold surrounds, and ceramic bezel insert can trace its roots to the matte dialed 5512 and 5513. Wearing them makes me think of times past when things were less complicated, where the most important thing was wearing a waterproof watch that could keep track of the elapsed time under water. Other than that not much else mattered. I know I am a little late to appreciate the attributes of these iconic watches, but better late than never. I would be interested to know if anyone else has had their expectations blown away by their vintage purchase.



Surely awesome watches and great writeup...great for long relaxed holidays too I guess when you wouldn't really want know the date.
__________________

Last thing I remember, I was Running outta sight
I had to find the passage back,To the place I was before.
’Relax,’ said this Rolex place,We are programmed to receive.
You can checkout any time you like, But you can never leave!
cruvon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 10:13 AM   #25
cruvon
"TRF" Member
 
cruvon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by michel33 View Post
+ 1, these subs are so nice....

Great collection there!
__________________

Last thing I remember, I was Running outta sight
I had to find the passage back,To the place I was before.
’Relax,’ said this Rolex place,We are programmed to receive.
You can checkout any time you like, But you can never leave!
cruvon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 10:55 AM   #26
bluemartinifan
"TRF" Member
 
bluemartinifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Russ
Location: Dallas Texas
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,124
John, I must keep this thread going - too much fun seeing everyones no date vintage subs
Attached Images
 
bluemartinifan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 11:33 AM   #27
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
Icon6

Russ always great to see that beauty again.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 11:37 AM   #28
cruvon
"TRF" Member
 
cruvon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluemartinifan View Post
John, I must keep this thread going - too much fun seeing everyones no date vintage subs
Great one Russ!
__________________

Last thing I remember, I was Running outta sight
I had to find the passage back,To the place I was before.
’Relax,’ said this Rolex place,We are programmed to receive.
You can checkout any time you like, But you can never leave!
cruvon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 12:08 PM   #29
johnkszabo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: florida
Watch: 16660 SD,SS 116520
Posts: 109
Awesome pair!!
johnkszabo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2011, 12:19 PM   #30
Michael M.
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
Love that 5512!!!
Michael M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.