The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 1 October 2011, 12:46 AM   #1
beaglehusky
"TRF" Member
 
beaglehusky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Tanzania
Posts: 1,553
Question re AP Royal Oak

Does anyone know the main differences between these two AP models:
14790ST
15300ST

I like that white dial!

I am looking at adding a RO to my collection and saw the 14790ST at what seems a fair price. I looked at AP's official website and it seems it's discontinued. Any input will be greatly appreciated.

Cheers,
Adrian
beaglehusky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 01:33 AM   #2
Dickson Lim
"TRF" Member
 
Dickson Lim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: planet
Posts: 1,517
The 14790ST is 36mm in size and equipped with calibre 2225 while the 15300ST is 39mm and equipped with calibre 3120. Their real life difference is very minimal though despite the obvious size difference. Hope it helps.
Dickson Lim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 01:50 AM   #3
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dickson Lim View Post
The 14790ST is 36mm in size and equipped with calibre 2555 while the 15300ST is 39mm and equipped with calibre 3120. Their real life difference is very minimal though despite the obvious size difference. Hope it helps.
The RO 14790 comes with the caliber 2225, not 2555. The 2225 is based off the JLC 889. If I am not mistaken, the 15300ST also comes with a see-though sapphire case back and the newer three blade deployant buckle, while the 14790 does not.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 01:56 AM   #4
Dickson Lim
"TRF" Member
 
Dickson Lim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: planet
Posts: 1,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submarino View Post
The RO 14790 comes with the caliber 2225, not 2555. The 2225 is based off the JLC 889. If I am not mistaken, the 15300ST also comes with a see-though sapphire case back and the newer three blade deployant buckle, while the 14790 does not.
Oops sorry typing error. Yes it is with the 2225 for the 14790 and the newer 13500 comes with the see through caseback.
Dickson Lim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 01:59 AM   #5
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dickson Lim View Post
Oops sorry typing error. Yes it is with the 2225 for the 14790 and the newer 13500 comes with the see through caseback.
I thought so but I wasn't sure. Just wanted to make sure he had the right caliber number.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 03:38 AM   #6
beaglehusky
"TRF" Member
 
beaglehusky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Tanzania
Posts: 1,553
Thank you both, I sincerely appreciate it. I think the discontinued model sounds like a good enough option for me at this point.

Adrian
beaglehusky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 03:44 AM   #7
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by beaglehusky View Post
Thank you both, I sincerely appreciate it. I think the discontinued model sounds like a good enough option for me at this point.

Adrian
Ask yourself why you are getting the AP then. Is it just to "have one" in the collection? To me, AP is about the timeless and historical design in combo with the in-house movement from one of the last family owned haute horology shops out there. I'd (and did actually) spent the extra money for a 15300 in a more wearable size and the beautiful 3120 in-house movement.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 04:12 AM   #8
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submarino View Post
The RO 14790 comes with the caliber 2225, not 2555. The 2225 is based off the JLC 889. If I am not mistaken, the 15300ST also comes with a see-though sapphire case back and the newer three blade deployant buckle, while the 14790 does not.
Correctomundo
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 09:11 PM   #9
beaglehusky
"TRF" Member
 
beaglehusky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Tanzania
Posts: 1,553
I hear you,

Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Ask yourself why you are getting the AP then. Is it just to "have one" in the collection? To me, AP is about the timeless and historical design in combo with the in-house movement from one of the last family owned haute horology shops out there. I'd (and did actually) spent the extra money for a 15300 in a more wearable size and the beautiful 3120 in-house movement.
but I have to exercise some restraint. I was at the AP boutique in Geneva last week and they showed me the 15300, which I loved, and then they showed me the (I think) 15202 and I was immediately in love with that watch, not only because of its looks but also because of the history behind it. Luckily (for my wallet at least) I'm not into complications, because the guy there was ready to show me some really outstanding pieces like the one he was wearing.

Thank you for the advice, I need to do some thinking before I go back there next month.
beaglehusky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2011, 10:27 PM   #10
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by beaglehusky View Post
but I have to exercise some restraint. I was at the AP boutique in Geneva last week and they showed me the 15300, which I loved, and then they showed me the (I think) 15202 and I was immediately in love with that watch, not only because of its looks but also because of the history behind it. Luckily (for my wallet at least) I'm not into complications, because the guy there was ready to show me some really outstanding pieces like the one he was wearing.

Thank you for the advice, I need to do some thinking before I go back there next month.
How about the 15305
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Wrist15305.JPG (77.0 KB, 592 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1723.JPG (147.9 KB, 586 views)
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2011, 12:10 AM   #11
Manofsteelpt
"TRF" Member
 
Manofsteelpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
^^^^^GREAT looking watch Thomas!!!! What's the diff between the 15300 and the 15202, just the movement inside? They look identical, but the 15202 is like 50% more...
Manofsteelpt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2011, 12:51 AM   #12
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
The 15300 has a second hand while 15202 does not. 15300 is thicker and has a more modern feeling bracelet. The 15202 movement (then the 2120 no date) was originally developed by JLC as the calibre 920 and commissioned by VC, AP, and PP. AP now has sole rights to the movement. The 2121 movement (upgrade from 2120 with date) is very thin due to the rotor resting on a rail. It's quite a beautiful movement. The 15300's 3120 is an in-house AP movement. A little thicker but excellent in its own right. The 2121 movement is used in very few AP models whereas the 3120 is the basis for a number of models like the ROO series (with a DUbois Depraz chrono module attached).

The 15202 is produced in far fewer numbers than the 15300. It's also truer to the original Genta design. However, as a starter I would recommend the 15300 due to its more modern styling. If you like it, then you can upgrade. Either way, I highly recommend trying it on first as it doesn't fit everyone well.

kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2011, 12:57 AM   #13
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSW View Post
How about the 15305
Thomas,
That is one sick watch. I'd never be able to tell the time as I'd get distracted by the movement. My next AP has to be the RG RO Jumbo or a Jules Audemars EOT.

Mike
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2011, 01:18 AM   #14
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
The 15300 has a second hand while 15202 does not. 15300 is thicker and has a more modern feeling bracelet. The 15202 movement (then the 2120 no date) was originally developed by JLC as the calibre 920 and commissioned by VC, AP, and PP. AP now has sole rights to the movement. The 2121 movement (upgrade from 2120 with date) is very thin due to the rotor resting on a rail. It's quite a beautiful movement. The 15300's 3120 is an in-house AP movement. A little thicker but excellent in its own right. The 2121 movement is used in very few AP models whereas the 3120 is the basis for a number of models like the ROO series (with a DUbois Depraz chrono module attached).

The 15202 is produced in far fewer numbers than the 15300. It's also truer to the original Genta design. However, as a starter I would recommend the 15300 due to its more modern styling. If you like it, then you can upgrade. Either way, I highly recommend trying it on first as it doesn't fit everyone well.

Nice
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2011, 01:24 AM   #15
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalip View Post
Nice
So when do we get you back into the fold Dalip?
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2011, 01:47 AM   #16
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manofsteelpt View Post
^^^^^GREAT looking watch Thomas!!!! What's the diff between the 15300 and the 15202, just the movement inside? They look identical, but the 15202 is like 50% more...
I was too late and my fellow friend Mike already answered that question.
I actually prefer the 15300 over the Jumbo even though it's more the original RO.
- Thicker case and thicker bracelet.
- Second hand
- Easier to find

Regarding the movement both are top notch
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2011, 02:01 AM   #17
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Thomas,
That is one sick watch. I'd never be able to tell the time as I'd get distracted by the movement. My next AP has to be the RG RO Jumbo or a Jules Audemars EOT.

Mike
EOT is one of my favorite pieces
Handled some nice complication AP's a while back
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ArnoldAllStar.jpg (91.5 KB, 550 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1762.jpg (85.5 KB, 551 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1771.jpg (173.5 KB, 552 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1768.JPG (187.7 KB, 549 views)
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2011, 03:38 AM   #18
drgleeds37
"TRF" Member
 
drgleeds37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Daniel Leeds
Location: Suburbs of DC
Watch: Rolex,AP,PAM,etc..
Posts: 306
I find that the 14790 wears very similarly to a 40mm Rolex. I wouldn't say that the 15300 is a more "wearable size" because for me the lugs stick out over my wrist. Try both of them on and decide what works best for you, for me it was the 14790.

-Daniel
drgleeds37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.