The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 October 2011, 02:35 AM   #1
gmh1013
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: greg
Location: Tempe AZ
Watch: GMT
Posts: 5,703
Thin is in according to Watch Time

Bought the new issue and it looks like all the new models are very thin and smaller....and IMHO its about time.
I love the 60's retro look and hope it last for a few years.
The past few years watches had got to be as big as my alarm clock!

The new A. Lange and Sohne Saxonia is a work of art even the low price Hamilton thin-o-matic looks great! My bank account is going to suffer.
gmh1013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 03:27 AM   #2
firstOwatch
"TRF" Member
 
firstOwatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Disneyland, Calif
Watch: 20th Moon, ND Sub.
Posts: 931
Used to be said:
" Thinner is better watch!
Thicker is better book! "

Are we really back in style?
firstOwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 03:29 AM   #3
Deepsea Florida
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 504
Since thin is in....

Time to sell the DSSD.

Guess I won't be able to get more than $500 bucks for it---now that thin is in.

Oh well. ;)
Deepsea Florida is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 03:30 AM   #4
gmh1013
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: greg
Location: Tempe AZ
Watch: GMT
Posts: 5,703
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deepsea Florida View Post
Since thin is in....

Time to sell the DSSD.

Guess I won't be able to get more than $500 bucks for it---now that thin is in.

Oh well. ;)
I will give you 550 for it!
gmh1013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 03:32 AM   #5
matt4hand
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Matt
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Tramp
Posts: 2,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmh1013 View Post
I will give you 550 for it!
$551 here! Lol
matt4hand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 03:57 AM   #6
mjrennie
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: MJR
Location: Midlands, UK
Watch: 116618 LB
Posts: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt4hand View Post
$551 here! Lol
These guys are being ridiculous. I'll do a grand via Paypal, tonight. $551, lol.

mjrennie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 04:10 AM   #7
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
Thin is the new style in my book. After 3 years with my DSSD I got sick of the thickness. Great watch but too thick. My new Sub C is perfect and the wrist time for the DSSD is suffering a lot. Only worn it 2x in 2 months for a few hours each time.
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 04:23 AM   #8
handsfull
"TRF" Member
 
handsfull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwalker View Post
Thin is the new style in my book. After 3 years with my DSSD I got sick of the thickness. Great watch but too thick. My new Sub C is perfect and the wrist time for the DSSD is suffering a lot. Only worn it 2x in 2 months for a few hours each time.
+1. Same situation with me. Love the SubC.
handsfull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 04:30 AM   #9
Oyster1982
"TRF" Member
 
Oyster1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Ed
Location: Jersey Shore
Watch: Rolex DJ
Posts: 1,905
Thats why I wear a 36mm DJ, its perfect no matter what the style is in.
__________________
It 10pm do you know where your Datejust is?
http://i1187.photobucket.com/albums/...DA0MC5qcGc.jpg
Oyster1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 05:17 AM   #10
NYC6
"TRF" Member
 
NYC6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Dennis
Location: L.I./N.Y.
Watch: SUBMARINER 14060M
Posts: 2,769
I'll be glad to see the ghetto sized wrist clocks they have now go away and not come back, hopefully.
NYC6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 06:41 AM   #11
Megalobyte
"TRF" Member
 
Megalobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwalker View Post
Thin is the new style in my book. After 3 years with my DSSD I got sick of the thickness. Great watch but too thick. My new Sub C is perfect and the wrist time for the DSSD is suffering a lot. Only worn it 2x in 2 months for a few hours each time.
Ok, then ill give you $551.
Megalobyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 06:48 AM   #12
Megalobyte
"TRF" Member
 
Megalobyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
I admit I once gravitated towards the very chunky hard core divers. I've grown up I think. :)

I picked up a vintage collection Aquatimer a while back, a capable diver but fairly thin. I began to appreciate thinner watches.

Then, later I chose a Sub C over a Deepsea for many reasons, but the thinner profile was one of them.

I'm very happy with my Sub C, and have no plans to get any thick, chunky watches. The ROO diver is tempting, though it's not really very thick, only moderately. The PP Aquanaut is the thinnest diver/sport I've tried on, it's a little strange though, a sport/water watch so thin and light, it's the very light weight I'm not sure I like, I don't need a lot of weight, but some. :)
Megalobyte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 06:57 AM   #13
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,303
I have a hard time understanding the fascination with "watch trends"....feels a little but like industry manipulation.

Buy what you like, wear what you like. Choice is king.

Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 06:58 AM   #14
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,303
I have a hard time understanding the fascination with "watch trends"....feels a little but like industry manipulation.

Buy what you like, wear what you like. Choice is king.

Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 07:01 AM   #15
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
Yeah, I agree on the new thin-ness trend - hence I picked up a JLC Master Control Ultra Thin.
It is amazing that they can squeeze a beautiful movement in a thin case.
I think it is going to be a new trend for more dressy watches.
I will probably end up gifting that to my dad
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 08:24 AM   #16
slashd0t
"TRF" Member
 
slashd0t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Edmonton, AB
Watch: This & That
Posts: 771
And everyone gives Rolex a hard time for making 'in the middle' watches... I really like size the the Sub/GMT's.. Not too big, not too small, therefor timeless..

That said, my grail is still a Big Pilot... Although, I just wore my GMT on my first trip and it was very useful..
__________________
/.
slashd0t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 08:26 AM   #17
boogiebot
"TRF" Member
 
boogiebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 3,804
i think that as thin as i can go is the subc. anything thinner is too thin IMO
boogiebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 08:58 AM   #18
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Hopefully they are right...Classics will always be classics. Thick and Big will always be cumbersome and look silly on most.
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 09:02 AM   #19
apeogre
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: No Clue
Posts: 586
I guess its time to sell all the panerais too!
apeogre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 09:04 AM   #20
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by apeogre View Post
I guess its time to sell all the panerais too!
We've been saying THAT all along!
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 09:06 AM   #21
Widows Son
"TRF" Member
 
Widows Son's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hudson Ohio
Posts: 3,564
Mom always said that you couldn't be too rich, or too thin. Looks like she was right. I've always been a fan of thin watches on a strap for dress. Vintage Omegas, Hamiltons, Universals, and IWC, all have a place in my rotation.
Widows Son is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 09:07 AM   #22
Widows Son
"TRF" Member
 
Widows Son's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hudson Ohio
Posts: 3,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey® View Post
Hopefully they are right...Classics will always be classics. Thick and Big will always be cumbersome and look silly on most.
Yes, but more often than not the wearer doesn't realize it!!!!
Widows Son is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 09:17 AM   #23
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
I knew it was coming.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 09:34 AM   #24
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
Both can and do exist together. You can enjoy different styles and both be in "trend". Different markets also cater for different cultural tastes/trends. What's popular in the USA may not be so across SE Asia, europe etc.... . Then you have the variations on a more local /national level.

Add into this the shift of taste with age....too many factors.

Simply buy what you like .....bigger will always be here. As will 36mm gents remain popular for certain ages/regions etc.

Also, why knock those that enjoy a bigger watch than you? Your personal tastes are just that....personal.
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 09:39 AM   #25
horseco
"TRF" Member
 
horseco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYC6 View Post
I'll be glad to see the ghetto sized wrist clocks they have now go away and not come back, hopefully.
I agree...
horseco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 10:13 AM   #26
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
The most important thing about this "new" trend is that there will be a broader range of choices for those who don't want a tuna can on their wrists.

The large watches aren't going away overnight. There will be those who will never give them up as long as they own one or they are still available on the market and they will be.

At the peak of the large watch trend, I'd see a watch on the internet that I really liked and then be disappointed that the thing was 48mm-50mm wide and 12mm thick.

Two aphorisms come to mind:

"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun."

"All things old are new again."
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 10:17 AM   #27
kyle L
"TRF" Member
 
kyle L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
Thin is good!





kyle L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 10:31 AM   #28
watchf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle L View Post
Thin is good!

That is really thin!

TBH when I started buying watches I didn't care or even know what trend size was in until I read about the 'big watch trend' and the 'big watch trend won't last' threads all over trf The main concern I had at the time was if the watch would look out of proportion on my wrist.
watchf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 10:33 AM   #29
kyle L
"TRF" Member
 
kyle L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchf View Post
That is really thin!

TBH when I started buying watches I didn't care or even know what trend size was in until I read about the 'big watch trend' and the 'big watch trend won't last' threads all over trf The main concern I had at the time was if the watch would look out of proportion on my wrist.
And it's not even a quartz, it has a manual movement inside. Not mine but I was amazed how thin it was, a little thicker than a coin.
kyle L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2011, 10:35 AM   #30
zhiunit
"TRF" Member
 
zhiunit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: zhi
Location: delaware
Watch: grandseiko sbgj001
Posts: 374
i think ppl with alarm clock sized watch are trying to compensate for....cough cough....small egos?
zhiunit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.