ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 October 2011, 01:13 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 143
|
I would not. It is not a very versatile piece IMHO. Now, if you already have another watch, then sure thing.
A friend of mine pulled an original blue face sub out of a coffee can over the fridge at his grandmother's house when grandpa died (seriously, this really happened!). He had it serviced / etc. and wore it to work for a little while - eventually, he ended up putting it in the drawer for safe keeping because it was just 'too out there' for everyday work in the IT shop. At least that's what he concluded. |
8 October 2011, 01:18 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Sandro
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex/GS
Posts: 4,412
|
Nope.
|
8 October 2011, 01:23 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 685
|
__________________
Bell & Ross: BRS-98S Casio: G-Shock GW-5000U / GW-5000-1JF / DW-5035D 35th / DW-5030C 30th / DW-5000SP 20th / DW-5600C-9CV / Marlin W-450 Panerai: Luminor 000i Seiko: SBGX117 / SBGX335 |
8 October 2011, 01:29 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
|
If you love the TT Sub c why not, of course this depends on what "some" money means. IMHO, I love the look of TT on everyone and in pics but whenever I get one for myself it just does not last long... I am a jeans a t shirt kind of guy and it just isnt me. That being said I have a TT GMT c right now
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki |
8 October 2011, 01:53 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sala hu din
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,782
|
How much to be paid in diffrence ?
|
8 October 2011, 02:07 PM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Lorenzo
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 116710LN & 116201
Posts: 849
|
No. And that is coming from someone that loges tt.
|
8 October 2011, 02:09 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Martin
Location: NY And FLA
Watch: AP ROO Blue Scuba
Posts: 2,695
|
I'm in this same dilemma right now..Have a Sub C already and a new GMT II C in the box... I put it on the wrist and it's just flat, doesn't wear as nice as the sub c or my deepsea, i guess just due to the case back.. Just feels so much smaller
Recently came across this (loving the blue tones) and after not being able to source a blue ceramic bezel for my sub c to create the "shark" , and not wanting to spend the crazy dough for the white gold variant, this really looks great... I would say go for it, you can always get another GMT II C whenever ! |
8 October 2011, 02:25 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: AZ
Watch: GMT II Coke
Posts: 132
|
Nope. Keep the GMT.
|
8 October 2011, 02:27 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Houston
Watch: 116509 BlackArabic
Posts: 1,176
|
Bluesy is my favorite Sub...I have a 16613, will get the SubC version sometime in the future.
__________________
Life is an adventure or nothing at all. |
8 October 2011, 02:51 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,002
|
I would not.
__________________
Licensed to kill time. |
8 October 2011, 03:15 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 131
|
Nope...
I wouldn't...
|
8 October 2011, 03:30 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: bp, hu, eu
Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln
Posts: 2,376
|
no. ss-yg-blue way too much for me.
__________________
16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman instagram: modus_horologicus |
8 October 2011, 03:37 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: 🤔
Posts: 8,424
|
brutal sometimes around here
__________________
♛ |
8 October 2011, 03:42 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
|
8 October 2011, 03:48 PM | #45 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Global assignment
Watch: '75 5513
Posts: 19
|
nope
|
8 October 2011, 04:29 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
YES unless you are trading a YG GMTIIc for the TT blue Subc then I would say no.
|
8 October 2011, 04:31 PM | #47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
Quote:
|
|
8 October 2011, 04:41 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
|
8 October 2011, 04:54 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Rich
Location: NC
Watch: Rolex 1675
Posts: 2,359
|
__________________
Rich Member of Nylon Nation Red Sox Nation Instagram watchguy97 |
8 October 2011, 05:26 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Macau
Watch: 16610LV 14060m
Posts: 399
|
|
8 October 2011, 05:55 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: CA
Watch: 116710
Posts: 237
|
Not a chance - unless it was for the TTIIC which looks better than the TT Subs.
|
8 October 2011, 07:39 PM | #52 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: MJR
Location: Midlands, UK
Watch: 116618 LB
Posts: 878
|
Of course. We have the blue and black in our house and I am able to switch between them using a re-sizing kit. The blue is way better than the black, though the black always seems to be more photogenic, for some reason. TT Sub over a GMT is a trade I'd do without thought.
|
8 October 2011, 09:35 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
sure
|
8 October 2011, 09:49 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
|
I prefer the Sub over the GMT. So yes I would. Which do you prefer?
__________________
Russ |
8 October 2011, 09:54 PM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: CT
Posts: 729
|
Not I
Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk |
8 October 2011, 10:51 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
|
I think that's a very personal choice. I like em both.
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80 |
9 October 2011, 02:07 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Martin
Location: NY And FLA
Watch: AP ROO Blue Scuba
Posts: 2,695
|
So beautiful, I think i'm sold...
I love the GMT C, but as I said wears too flat giving the appearance of it being much smaller than the SUB on my bigger wrist.. It's a weird illusion, but 'WE' must love what we wear, and be happy with it too right? I'm going to go for it, and then pick up a GMT II pepsi for my GMT needs |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.