ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

bgluckdo · 13 November 2011, 12:22 AM

Does anyone know if the 14060m has had a case size change in the last few years? I looked at a V series at one AD and thought it might be smaller then a random G series one I saw at another AD. Thanks in advance for the info.

sleddog · 13 November 2011, 12:25 AM

No change....

dddrees · 13 November 2011, 12:25 AM

No changes to the Sub ND case, however the Sub Date's case was changed a couple of years ago.

MoBe · 13 November 2011, 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddrees

No changes to the Sub ND case, however the Sub Date's case was changed a couple of years ago.

How was it changed,can you be specific?

dddrees · 13 November 2011, 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoBe

How was it changed,can you be specific?

When they went from the 16610 to the 116610 or SubC the diameter didn't change but they went to a much more beefier case with bigger lugs.

Speed · 13 November 2011, 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bgluckdo

Does anyone know if the 14060m has had a case size change in the last few years? I looked at a V series at one AD and thought it might be smaller then a random G series one I saw at another AD. Thanks in advance for the info.

Should still be 39mm I believe.

Mickey® · 13 November 2011, 01:21 AM

The "Original" "Classic"

16610 case is just a tad larger than the ND Sub, right?

sleddog · 13 November 2011, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mickey®

The "Original" "Classic"

16610 case is just a tad larger than the ND Sub, right?

Nope, same size....Just slightly thicker!
Here's a great link from our reference library comparing the two!

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=112776

Mickey® · 13 November 2011, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleddog

Nope, same size....Just slightly thicker!
Here's a great link from our reference library comparing the two!

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=112776

Thanks I'll check it out...Someone posted/told me smaller. I got to find post and flame them!!!

bgluckdo · 13 November 2011, 03:25 AM

Does the sea dweller have a smaller diameter case then the 14060m?

Danand · 13 November 2011, 03:36 AM

Nope

Speed · 13 November 2011, 03:48 AM

There are some excellent Sub Date, No Date etc. spec comparisons in the TRF library. No slagging on the Forum, but the Forum software / layout requires you to search for these kinds of things by key words... Sometimes Googling is easier.

13 November 2011, 12:22 AM	#1
bgluckdo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: michigan Posts: 91	14060M case size change Does anyone know if the 14060m has had a case size change in the last few years? I looked at a V series at one AD and thought it might be smaller then a random G series one I saw at another AD. Thanks in advance for the info.

13 November 2011, 12:25 AM	#2
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,931	No change.... __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

13 November 2011, 12:25 AM	#3
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,253	No changes to the Sub ND case, however the Sub Date's case was changed a couple of years ago. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

13 November 2011, 01:21 AM	#7
Mickey® Banned Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Mickey® Location: Atlanta, GA Watch: Swiss Made Posts: 5,801	The "Original" "Classic" 16610 case is just a tad larger than the ND Sub, right?

13 November 2011, 03:25 AM	#10
bgluckdo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: michigan Posts: 91	Does the sea dweller have a smaller diameter case then the 14060m?

13 November 2011, 03:36 AM	#11
Danand "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Jonathan Location: Ottawa Watch: 116610LN Posts: 1,246	Nope

13 November 2011, 03:48 AM	#12
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,706	There are some excellent Sub Date, No Date etc. spec comparisons in the TRF library. No slagging on the Forum, but the Forum software / layout requires you to search for these kinds of things by key words... Sometimes Googling is easier.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)