ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
8 December 2011, 01:45 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Rich
Location: USA - Minnesota
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 97
|
Andres --
For what its worth, here is a link to a ceramic sub from one of TRF's most trusted sellers (DavidSW). http://rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=204185 This watch also seems to be similar to yours in terms of the magnification, so I'm sure you are fine. Also, The GMT Master (my personal, recently adopted "patron saint" of anything Rolex ... smile) chimed in earlier on and said that it is perfectly normal. Of course, nothing wrong with stopping in to the authorized and just asking about AR coatings and magnification. With any luck they will have one in the case that you can compare against. When ordering my ceramic sub and comparing it against the previous design, I did notice a difference and, to me, the date actually looked sharper on the cyclops on the ceramic sub (which I liked). |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.