|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 February 2012, 12:13 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Hank
Location: Wachula
Watch: Had many love all
Posts: 476
|
Rolex Explorer II Ref 16750?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/2005-ROLEX-E...item256c4c463b
What is this. I have never heard of a 16750 Exp II. Is this legitimate? |
|
|
|
8 February 2012, 12:27 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,773
|
Should be 16570,maybe just a typo.
The pictures are good and the 16570 is clearly visible in one of them. The watch looks ok but if I`m wrong I`m sure someone will correct me before too long. |
|
|
|
|
8 February 2012, 02:41 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Hank
Location: Wachula
Watch: Had many love all
Posts: 476
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 February 2012, 04:54 AM
|
#4 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
The reference number between the lugs is 16570, so the 16750 is clearly a typo.
The watch looks good to me. The cyclops is the only thing that looks weird to me, but the I've notice when looking at the real ExpII's the numbers aren't as magnified as on some other models. The one here looks off-center and a little frosty, but I guess there could be rational explanations for that.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
