ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 March 2012, 11:54 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
Hold the horses Rolex, slow it down!
I hope from here on Rolex will stop fiddling with its current models and stop introducing new models & making slight changes to its current models for a long time. The rate they are doing it has made me lost a little interest in it.
|
25 March 2012, 11:56 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
|
I dont follow...
__________________
John Submariner C LN Explorer 42 Polar |
25 March 2012, 11:59 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Kansas
Watch: 16610, Omega PO
Posts: 1,898
|
Yeah, I'm lost too. Sounds like you want them to do nothing...
__________________
Things got out of control and I had to stab a clown... |
25 March 2012, 12:40 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
|
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki |
25 March 2012, 12:45 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
So no improvements or new models????? Be pretty boring. Maybe the OP would be better suited to the vintage forum.
|
25 March 2012, 12:59 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
I'm not sure that all of the recent activity is really any more than what they have done in previous years. Improvements and changes have always been made over the years. Besides some changes may have been percieved to be or actually required in order to continue selling as much or more of their product.
The great thing is that if you don't like the current line up there are plenty of examples of previous versions which can be purchased.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
25 March 2012, 01:04 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
What I am saying is I hope they will go back to doing unmarketed improvements if need be now that the seemed to have finished introducing the new generation of existing and non existing models including the latest SkyDweller. I hope they would not make a show and dance changes to each model every year that splits models up into different 'series'.
This is my opinion, I am not asking anyone to agree with me so please any rude remarks are not appreciated. |
25 March 2012, 01:41 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Kansas
Watch: 16610, Omega PO
Posts: 1,898
|
I'm still confused. And yes, you're entitled to your opinion - just as the rest of us are.
__________________
Things got out of control and I had to stab a clown... |
25 March 2012, 01:52 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
|
I tend to agree, too many models muddle the brand... I feel like less would be more also...
|
25 March 2012, 06:55 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
I think this year was pretty much perfect. A brand new model, a brand new groundbreaking movement, two expected "facelifts" (YM, Sub-C ND), an interesting and popular model extension (DJ II), and the usual diamonds & stones. I don't expect a new movement or new model in the upcoming let's say 5 or 10 years, but now that all models are updated/facelifted with the modern bracelet and clasp, it will be time to introduce some long-awaited watches, like the Pepsi/Coke GMTIIC, and the ceramic bezel SS Daytona.
So far Rolex have done the best and even more to my expectations. Sure, taste-wise and pricetag-wise the new Sky-Dweller isn't for most of us here, but for a watch afficionado the pure fact of its existence make us feel better about the brand. It will truly make Rolex's star on the watch sky shine even brighter.
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
25 March 2012, 07:00 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
Quote:
HANW |
|
25 March 2012, 07:18 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
I think Rolex has been pretty conservative every year, compared to most other watch houses.
Just look at Omega, Tag, Hublot, AP..... It seems like they had to introduce at least one new model and have at least a movie star/sports personnel associated model as well as a reintroduced vintage /retro model every year..... Hold your horses you say? |
25 March 2012, 07:38 PM | #13 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: MJR
Location: Midlands, UK
Watch: 116618 LB
Posts: 878
|
Quote:
|
|
25 March 2012, 07:57 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Howell, NJ
Posts: 521
|
I dont think any brand will ever please everyone...
I however am pleased esp. with the new YM(bluesy)... |
25 March 2012, 08:46 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
Well, the product replacement plan has pretty much come to an end now - all models have received the updates they really needed without compromising their character and integrity. You have to remember that some of these models had been in production for almost 20 years with minimal changes - the updates were overdue, and Rolex have been methodical and efficient with what they've done.
I think we'll be seeing the expansion of existing ranges (more options etc.) as well as the expansion of their higher-end range - I have a feeling that we will be seeing more watches using the command bezel. I think the next few years are going to be very interesting, and very exciting |
25 March 2012, 08:51 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NYC area
Watch: 16520A30
Posts: 538
|
I'm hoping ROLEX gives the Daytona a facelift next year.
I'm wishing it would be at least 44mm, with a date! (and an homage to Paul Newman on its dial would be great!) |
25 March 2012, 09:23 PM | #17 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
|
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
25 March 2012, 11:02 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Ozone
Watch: DD, DJ, SubC Date
Posts: 1,666
|
At this point and given the new 2012 line with which I am disappointed generally, there is no modern Rolex in which I'm interested ... except for the 36mm Platinum DD with glacier blue dial.
|
25 March 2012, 11:07 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
There are a precious few Rolexes currently in production that I'm interested in. Milgauss GV, Daytona, DJ36/DD36 and I guess that is it. I guess next year Rolex will slap on a date on the Daytona, blow it up to 45 mm and increase the thickness to 19 mm.
|
25 March 2012, 11:08 PM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
i think we all need to work at the Rolex factory
|
25 March 2012, 11:47 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Bob
Location: Dallas, Texas
Watch: Daytona Meteorite
Posts: 3,417
|
I think they have been fairly conservative, retiring some nameplates and adding/replacing others. Dial and bezel variations aside, I didn't realize it, but the experts here make it sound easy to just 'slap' a complication on a calibre….
ROLEX has one of the most prestigious and advanced manufacturing processes in the world, such that changing anything requires meticulous control of processes to assure there is no compromise to the brand or quality.
__________________
meteor flying to Earth onto my wrist... 116509 Daytona Meteorite, 116520 Daytona Black, 116710 GMTIIC, 16013 DATEJUST, CARTIER SANTOS 100 W20090X8, IWC Big Pilot, IWC Top Gun "Everything works out in the end. If it hasn't worked out, it's not the end." |
25 March 2012, 11:59 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
|
If Rolex stops making changes, many will complain (as they often do) that Rolex has stopped innovating and that they are being lazy.
No matter what Rolex does, people will be unhappy.
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44 |
26 March 2012, 12:08 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Stephen
Location: STOCKPORT
Watch: White Explorer II
Posts: 50
|
I sort of agree with the original sentiment. I made the decision that my first high end watch would be a rolex because they had a timeless enduring appeal and were not a fashion watch. I bought a ss dj on a jubilee and intend to wear it for many years , as I have seen many older gents wearing their very obviously old but cherished dj,s. Fashion watches by definition go out out of fashion and will look ridiculous on my brown wrinkled wizened arm in decades to come. . Having said that i still think rolex are following the right path as their watches evolve but are still recognisable within each model range.I do own cheap fashion watches but see them as disposable.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.