The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 29 March 2012, 02:49 PM   #1
cbahn
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 24
How does AP age with scratches

i ve found that subs age rather nicely

but is it the case for RO as well? or is it more of a watch that should be pampered and worn only for certain occasions?

Also, do you guys think its a MUST to get 15300 now since it is soon going to be discontinued?

Many thanks from AP noob
cbahn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2012, 03:23 PM   #2
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbahn View Post
i ve found that subs age rather nicely

but is it the case for RO as well? or is it more of a watch that should be pampered and worn only for certain occasions?

Also, do you guys think its a MUST to get 15300 now since it is soon going to be discontinued?

Many thanks from AP noob
Well yes and no... The facets on the bezel scratch pretty easily and get's rounded after 2-3 times when polished.
Although i must say a patinated AP doesn't look that bad

I would definitive recommend you to get the classic sized 15300 a model i don't think was necessary for AP to upgrade.
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2012, 09:56 AM   #3
DucS2R
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 135
I notice the scratches on my 15300 more than I do on my sub. So far it bothers me, but the 15300 is only 5 months old. And I highly recommend getting one, depending on your wrist size. It fits me perfectly and the new ones are like Goldilocks, too big or too small (or too expensive!). IMHO, the 15300 is a perfect watch, why mess with it?

T
DucS2R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2012, 08:08 PM   #4
Adam K.
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Watch: All the Oysters
Posts: 811
15300 was great---the new 3120 RO's, not so much (to me anyway). Looks like AP is forcing its clientele to the classic Jumbo. Curses!
Adam K. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2012, 08:16 PM   #5
Fiery
"TRF" Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
If you want a classic sized (39mm) RO with a seconds hand or with an in-house movement, then hurry up and pick up the 15300 until it's still available NOS at ADs.

According to my experiences, the RO is definitely a watch that you wear with a bit more care than a Rolex sports model. The intricate edges and beautiful finish of the RO looks stunning brand new, but after it collects scratches and dings it starts looking bad very quickly. Refinishing/polishing is an option that you shouldn't consider many times on the RO, because it will quickly ruin the edges as Thomas mentioned.

I personally wear the RO for such activities when damaging it is unlikely, while I wear the SS Sub-C for any activities. For me these watches complement each other nicely, although there's still room for a watch that is less sporty than the RO, one that I'd wear for those special occasions only. Maybe it will be a Patek, one day...
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)
Fiery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2012, 02:32 AM   #6
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiery View Post
If you want a classic sized (39mm) RO with a seconds hand or with an in-house movement, then hurry up and pick up the 15300 until it's still available NOS at ADs.

According to my experiences, the RO is definitely a watch that you wear with a bit more care than a Rolex sports model. The intricate edges and beautiful finish of the RO looks stunning brand new, but after it collects scratches and dings it starts looking bad very quickly. Refinishing/polishing is an option that you shouldn't consider many times on the RO, because it will quickly ruin the edges as Thomas mentioned.

I personally wear the RO for such activities when damaging it is unlikely, while I wear the SS Sub-C for any activities. For me these watches complement each other nicely, although there's still room for a watch that is less sporty than the RO, one that I'd wear for those special occasions only. Maybe it will be a Patek, one day...
I feel the same way. Scratch magnet not meant for rough activities but the most beautiful watch on the world.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk. Watches are the new currency!
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.