ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 April 2012, 08:24 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
|
14060M or the new 114060
Guys, I am going to buy my first Rolex this year. I am interested in the ND sub. Two options are now available: a G serial 14060M from AD or wait for the new released 114060. 14060m is definitley a classic model, however, I prefer a "strong" brecelet; also I am concerned about the bule hairspring, does it matter that much? The 114060 has a Non SEL and soild bracelet, but is it more brittle?
So what is your option? Thanks |
12 April 2012, 08:33 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
Good question
How are we going to take your decision . . . Go and try each at a Rolex store and compare. In real life on your wrist and take your time Make sure you buy the one that suites you 100 % Good luck |
12 April 2012, 08:37 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
|
I'm leaning towards the SUB C ND..but thats cause i already have a 14060M... I say get the classic as a 1st...and im sure the SUB C ND gon follow soon
|
12 April 2012, 08:57 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
|
Thanks, I just tried the old one, looks great but feels very light. Hope the new one will be available in a couple of mons.
|
12 April 2012, 08:58 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
|
|
12 April 2012, 11:12 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
This topic has been discussed a lot lately. If you do a quick search for 14060 you will get lots of threads on the subject. Here is the latest.
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...ghlight=14060m IMHO, the ceramic has to much gloss on the new Rolex sport watches. If Rolex gave the dial and ceramic insert a matt finish like the new Omega PO's, it would have been a huge hit. Now it has sadly fallen into the world of jewelery, get a 14060 now.
__________________
My grails: |
12 April 2012, 11:21 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Bah Humbug
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
12 April 2012, 11:59 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
|
I would get the 14060 - if you get the G-serial I believe it should have the blue parachrom hairspring (not that it matters). I've got one myself and will also get the 114060 when it's released...honestly, the bracelet on the 14060 is just fine...it's worked better than most other brands for the past 50 years!
|
13 April 2012, 12:08 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,307
|
Easy. 14060M. Not a fan of the fat lugs.
|
13 April 2012, 12:11 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
|
13 April 2012, 12:14 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
|
13 April 2012, 12:18 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Watch: them come and go
Posts: 689
|
ceramic for me, looks awesome, I like the newer clasps and fat lugs and also a big fan or the ceramic bezels that Rolex make
__________________
John Sub 126610LV incoming GMT 126710 BLRO YM 40 126622 Rhodium IWC Portugieser Automatic 40.4mm - Pink dial |
13 April 2012, 12:44 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Hairspring is a dont care IMO.
I think the old bracelets are plenty strong. What are you worried about? It's fine to wait for the new one of you prefer the new mods. Do you? You will likely be waiting for a while... |
13 April 2012, 02:29 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Earth
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 516
|
Parachrom hairspring doesn't matter much. And the bracelet of 14060M is pretty strong. The new model has a better clasp.
|
13 April 2012, 02:38 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 518
|
+1 Try each one on, buy the one that looks and feels the best to you
__________________
Submariner 114060 |
13 April 2012, 03:21 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
|
Quote:
The 14060 bracelet is very strong and functional, and appeals on a nostalgic level, but does seem out-of-place on an expensive watch in 2012. Those of us who prefer it know who we are. If you're undecided, you'd probably prefer the new one. |
|
13 April 2012, 05:14 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,964
|
you won't break the 14060M bracelet if you are wearing it on your wrist
don't worry :) i would go for 14060M because its already discontined and soon they won't be available as new watch at the AD if you like the 114060 down the road, you can still get them new cause Rolex will be making them years to come
__________________
135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R |
13 April 2012, 05:16 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Paul
Location: Midlands UK
Watch: GMT IIc, Daytona
Posts: 423
|
I would go old school, if you think how many older Rolex's are still running without the 'Blue hairspring", including my two old Omega's, one being 47years and the other one is 78 years old and both have such a lovely 'tick' the latter one especially
|
13 April 2012, 05:18 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 3,804
|
personally i like the updates to the case as well as the ceramic bezel and glide lock clasp of the new subs. my vote goes for the new sub nd. im sure whatever you end up with you will love and you really cant go wrong with either.
|
13 April 2012, 05:38 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
I don't get why people wouldn't go with the new one. How many of you go to a car lot and buy the old discontinued model??? If you want a ND Sub buy one that's a few years old and save 50%. The ND Sub C isn't worth the asking price either IMO but I'd rather have it than the older one.
|
13 April 2012, 05:48 AM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,311
|
If you go pre-owned, you'll be able to find nice examples for 50-60% of the new NDc. Only you can decide if the ceramic bezel, fat lugs and new bracelet is worth it.
Either watch is a fine choice. |
13 April 2012, 06:27 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
|
If a significant concern of yours is the strength of the bracelet, then I would add to what springbar said above. The springbars are indeed the weakest link. And to add to that, I would suggest that the old school 14060 with lug holes and thicker springbars all the way through is superior In this aspect to the new sub ND-c with it's standard spring bars and no lug holes. Just another thought to consider if robustness is important to you.
|
13 April 2012, 06:15 PM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Earth
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 516
|
Quote:
|
|
13 April 2012, 06:21 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
Classic 14060 for me!
__________________
AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
13 April 2012, 06:38 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
|
a week after i got my 14060M i tried the 116610 ..i was eager to trade it for the SUB C..before i did anything 'stupid' i seek some advice from the experts here on TRF...most of the experts here ask me to keep it coz its a true classic ...so i did..and sure enough the 14060M grew on me...the classic look..its comfortable and its cool as it is....to me the upgrade version got everything i love ...the glide lock/ceremic bezel/ a larger case...but i think its a lil 'unfair' to compare both side by side because 14060 kept its 'heritage' wherby the upgrade version got what i like to call 'better quality' ....if you ask me to choose again as my 1st...i will still pick the classic especially now since its been discontinued...hope this will help you instead of confusing you...but like all em TRFers said...you win either way because its a ROLEX...
p/s-did i mentioned about the lug holes where the new version's lack of..? |
13 April 2012, 06:57 PM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
|
Quote:
|
|
13 April 2012, 06:59 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
|
theprice of the new one seems to be added 10% .
|
13 April 2012, 06:59 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: A.K.W
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Me Watching U
Posts: 587
|
Get classic. And ceramic date later.
|
13 April 2012, 07:04 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
|
no prob my man....there's plenty of great 1st class seller here on TRF if you dont like the new one...cheers..
|
13 April 2012, 10:12 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Martin
Location: London
Watch: Sub,Exp2,BlkBy,SD
Posts: 1,258
|
Without starting yet another thread about the 14060m, I feel obliged to announce that i had a call from AD yesterday to say that a brand spanking new Sub is on it's way with my name on it. Hopefully it'll be with me on Thursday evening.
Oh the joys. I feel it's going to compliment my 16570 perfectly.
__________________
Lest we forget. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 10 (0 members and 10 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.