The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 April 2012, 10:18 PM   #31
Roley
"TRF" Member
 
Roley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Roland
Location: GMT -4:00 Today
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 874
Out with the old....In with the new.
Roley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 11:05 PM   #32
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Does the lastest gen of 14060 come with solid end links on the bracelet?
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2012, 11:11 PM   #33
Hansch99
"TRF" Member
 
Hansch99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 14060M, 116200
Posts: 318
Between those two, I'd get the 14060M. It's the last of the classic Subs, in my view, and I particularly like the lug holes and lug shape. One of the great things about the 14060M is that for years, it has been its "own watch," with features and dimensions totally unique to it, and that strong link to the Sub's heritage. However, now the 114060 is just a 116610 without the date...nothing else to set it apart, and nothing to make me particularly want to get it.
Hansch99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2012, 12:24 AM   #34
astrazen
"TRF" Member
 
astrazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 328
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwalker View Post
I don't get why people wouldn't go with the new one. How many of you go to a car lot and buy the old discontinued model??? If you want a ND Sub buy one that's a few years old and save 50%. The ND Sub C isn't worth the asking price either IMO but I'd rather have it than the older one.
I would love to buy a few discontinued old model cars if you dont mind.

Its not something you have to "get".
astrazen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2012, 11:50 PM   #35
WPI
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London
Watch: PAM088, Daytona,
Posts: 25
14060M any day of the week. A true classic
WPI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 02:06 AM   #36
le_baroudeur
"TRF" Member
 
le_baroudeur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rennes, FRANCE
Posts: 802
Well, the functionality will not be a criteria: the14060 has been abused for years without failing. Ok, it is a bit more noisy with the endlinks but that is all.

BUT aeshetically, which one does smile at you? Listen to passion, not reason.. because reason tend to decrease over the time, and passion stays forever.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons.
le_baroudeur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 02:43 AM   #37
herbie911
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 445
If you are a flipper, the 14060 will have better resale value in the next 10 years or so. If you want up to date technology and improved solidity, go for the newer model!
Most important, which looks better on your wrist!

I bought a Sub C last month cause I don't tends to sell my watch and it looks stunning on my wrist!
herbie911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 03:05 AM   #38
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by herbie911 View Post
If you are a flipper, the 14060 will have better resale value in the next 10 years or so. If you want up to date technology and improved solidity, go for the newer model!
Most important, which looks better on your wrist!

I bought a Sub C last month cause I don't tends to sell my watch and it looks stunning on my wrist!
I disagree. How many 16610s do you se bringing anything close to what a SubC is going for. Same with modern GMTs. The modern ND Sub is never going to be rare and collectable. Just because it's being discontinued doesn't mean the value is going through the roof.
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 03:57 AM   #39
Gundam
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK / HK
Posts: 188
Hard to predict. Depends on prevailing collector sentiment in a few decades' time. On the whole, the 14060(m) will never be rare... But the COSC will have only had barely a 4-year production run, assuming it is in the process of discontinuation... still a lot of them out there and not difficult to source but collectors may subdivide them. Who knows what will be deemed desirable in 50 years time?
Gundam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 05:14 AM   #40
jhcam8
"TRF" Member
 
jhcam8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
You'll probably like one over the other in the same way you might prefer the new v. old date models.
jhcam8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 07:13 AM   #41
Ichaice
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 133
14060m

In my humble opinion the 14060M is pretty much the best watch you can buy, it's just got that wow factor
Ichaice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 07:41 AM   #42
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by le_baroudeur View Post
Listen to passion, not reason.. because reason tend to decrease over the time, and passion stays forever.
Love that sentance and rationale.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 08:09 AM   #43
MrLee
"TRF" Member
 
MrLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: London
Watch: Sub c, smp
Posts: 327
Get the new one, that tuna can strap will grait and you will end up regretting your purchase. The new ones are a huge improvement.

Here's an example of what I mean

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=228306
MrLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 09:27 AM   #44
dimitros
"TRF" Member
 
dimitros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: nope
Location: S of Mason-Dixon
Watch: NDSub/PAM176/R1931
Posts: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrLee View Post
Get the new one, that tuna can strap will grait and you will end up regretting your purchase. The new ones are a huge improvement.
Mine doesn't grate. Not sure what you talking about. I don't regret my purchase at all. In fact I'm wearing my 14060m now. I think I am spoiled by this comfortable light weight watch.
dimitros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 09:59 AM   #45
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by ggelvis View Post
Thanks, I just tried the old one, looks great but feels very light. Hope the new one will be available in a couple of mons.
I tend to think the lighter the more comfortable personally. Don't let the blu hairspring be a deciding factor though, you really wont be able to tell one way or another with this item. However the actual case size and bracelet will make a difference. Comparisions can be made now between the older Sub ND and a SubC. Go for the one that makes you the happiest.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 02:55 PM   #46
polarinda
"TRF" Member
 
polarinda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
The bracelet should be the least of your concern. This thing loves rubber..
Attached Images
 
polarinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 07:30 PM   #47
astrazen
"TRF" Member
 
astrazen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 328
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrLee View Post
Get the new one, that tuna can strap will grait and you will end up regretting your purchase. The new ones are a huge improvement.

Here's an example of what I mean

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=228306
I have had the DSSD with what is the most advanced Rolex clasp but I got rid. The 14060 is my daily wear and I wouldnt swap it for anything.
astrazen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2012, 07:42 PM   #48
Naya72
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Naya
Location: Kuwait
Watch: Keep it simple
Posts: 122
14060M for me...I love the rattling sound and it's just light
Naya72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2012, 06:43 AM   #49
z32turbo
"TRF" Member
 
z32turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
I'd go for the one you like the look of the best. I prefer the newer bracelet over the old so I'd wait for the SubC ND if it were me.
__________________


Instagram @z32turbo
z32turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2012, 06:45 PM   #50
ggelvis
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 20
Many thanks for you guys. I would like to wear both on and then make the final decision.
ggelvis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2012, 06:52 PM   #51
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,508
I vote ceramic.

Love the new bezel and bracelet on the updated Subs.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2012, 08:14 PM   #52
mikkolopez
"TRF" Member
 
mikkolopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,301
I have a 14060M which is my ode to the classic Sub ... but I would also like the new kid on the classic Sub block so i'd also go with the modern 14040M with that ceramic bezel, updated case and bracelet, that is the bomb.
mikkolopez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 12:58 AM   #53
dnagwhogas
"TRF" Member
 
dnagwhogas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: MauiBacerdo
Location: Chicago
Watch: N :Learn
Posts: 902
I'd like to try on the new one. The SEL and the new clasp is interesting.
__________________

P-Club Member # 7

Time is what prevents everything from happening at once.
dnagwhogas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 09:08 PM   #54
erolorhun
"TRF" Member
 
erolorhun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Watch: Rolex 14060M
Posts: 72
The 14060M is a paragon of functional design and is absolutely timeless. The new bracelet is good step forward though.

In the end, what the unwashed masses of TRF thinks doesnŽt matter one iota. Try both on and go with whichever makes your heart beat a little faster
__________________
Looking for a 114060 (10/12/2022 - got one in 2016 - couldŽnt get on with it - sat in a drawer for five years, then sold to a friend - ergo, no longer looking..)

automobiliana.blogspot.se
erolorhun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 09:54 PM   #55
gmtm2
"TRF" Member
 
gmtm2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,419
the new one....
__________________
forever rolex
gmtm2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2012, 10:14 PM   #56
tifosi
"TRF" Member
 
tifosi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwalker View Post
I disagree. How many 16610s do you se bringing anything close to what a SubC is going for. Same with modern GMTs. The modern ND Sub is never going to be rare and collectable. Just because it's being discontinued doesn't mean the value is going through the roof.
What he said.

Go ceramic!
__________________
Russ
tifosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 07:05 AM   #57
MattUSN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1
If one wanted to replace the spring bars on his 114060 with shoulderless spring bars, and not wishing to remove the bracelet, could this be done?

Thanks
MattUSN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 07:15 AM   #58
hpowders
"TRF" Member
 
hpowders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Tampa, Fl
Watch: Rolex 114060
Posts: 313
Paragon schmaragon. I got the 114060 because if I decide to sell it, I will most likely get more for it than for the 14060M.
hpowders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 08:12 AM   #59
LA_LEC
"TRF" Member
 
LA_LEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by hpowders View Post
Paragon schmaragon. I got the 114060 because if I decide to sell it, I will most likely get more for it than for the 14060M.
Yes but you also paid more for it so one would expect that right.
__________________
1661016610LV214270 MK2
"Life is far too short not to wear a Rolex!"
LA_LEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2013, 09:38 AM   #60
Bruno C
"TRF" Member
 
Bruno C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Argentina
Watch: Submariner 14060M
Posts: 449
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwatchman View Post
Easy. 14060M. Not a fan of the fat lugs.
idem.
Bruno C is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.