The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 1 June 2012, 02:30 AM   #14
slcbbrown
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
machine

Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
I don't disagree but you really have to weigh the costs vs profits. These new technologies are expensive. Until a giant like Rolex or Swatch implements it, you won't see economy of scale to get the cost lower. Who'd pay Rolex level prices for a better technology watch with a no name brand?
An auto watch is still a little machine, so I'm not sure a proven technology really exists. Certainly, PP for $50,000 would use it, if it were there. People pay $100,000 for a useless tourbillon, wouldn't they pay for a 20 year service interval?

If you drive a Chevy or a Mercedes, you still get to change the oil at about the same interval.
slcbbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.