GMTIIc or Sub LV

[David cote]

I think the GMTIIC is the winner!!!

I truly love this watch too!!

[wowie74]

I'm trading my LV F with GMT IIC .

DavidSW expect a phone call from me
right after my plane landed. Lol!!O

[bigrustypig]

Sub LV slightly ahead of the GMT2C........that green dial is something else.

[David cote]

[Psmith]

Originally Posted by David cote

Great - congrats

[Blingface]

Solid choice.

[impalass]

Congrats, and solid Boston

[mgpdragon64]

[floater156]

Yesterday I tried on a GMTIIc and a Subc, the GMT seemed to weigh less, can anyone verify this?

[ralpie]

GMTIIC has a great look and is rated at 100M water resistance. It has a modern ceramic bezel, and I believe it is slightly thinner than the sub. I'd go for that one, and brush the center links.

[ralpie]

Originally Posted by floater156

Yesterday I tried on a GMTIIc and a Subc, the GMT seemed to weigh less, can anyone verify this?

it should be thinner as the caseback is flatter. The sub requires the caseback come out a bit for added water resistance. Somebody who knows better can correct me if I'm wrong. I own neither.

[Andrés G]

The GMT wins for me. I never bonded with the LV I had.

[cdweller]

GMT is such a solid watch, but the LV just has that "special" feel that you can't exactly describe but you know it when you have it on your wrist. Good luck

[gwalker]

Originally Posted by floater156

Yesterday I tried on a GMTIIc and a Subc, the GMT seemed to weigh less, can anyone verify this?

The weights are very close. I just looked up a previous thread that had the GMTIIC at 152 grams and SubC at 158 (I just weighed my sub) with same amount of links. Yes the SubCs caseback is a little thicker and the glide lock weighs more than GMTIICs clasp but due to the GMTs extra complication it's movement weighs more. I couldn't tell much of a difference hen holding both at the same time.