The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 24 November 2007, 09:08 AM   #1
entropydave
"TRF" Member
 
entropydave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: Huntington, IN
Posts: 680
Why Omega?

As a keen astronomer and having had the pleasure of meeting Buzz Aldrin a few weeks ago (I had to name drop!), I wondered why NASA picked Omega to be used on the Apollo missions instead of Rolex?
...I was wondering also if the self-wind rotor would work in zero G?!
I am trying a "gedanken experiment" to answer that one but I am struggling with it!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Image1.jpg (77.7 KB, 141 views)
entropydave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2007, 09:33 AM   #2
Letsgodiving
"TRF" Member
 
Letsgodiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
Here is a good article on it.

http://www.classicwristwatch.com/Wat...In%20Space.htm
Letsgodiving is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2007, 09:37 AM   #3
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Al "Alcan" pretty much answered that one long ago:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcan View Post
It is. An automatic watch will work in zero gravity. Although gravity helps to move the rotor when the watch is held in the vertical plane, it does nothing when the watch is held in the horizontal plane.

Rotors are influenced by gravity but more so by inertia, the tendency of an object in motion to remain in motion. Witness the infamous "J.J. brandy swirl" when restarting a Rolex after it's run down. Gravity has nothing to do with that.

Nasa assumed (incorrectly) that an automatic watch wouldn't work in zero gravity.

From TimeZone:

"In 1965 NASA purchased five reputable chronographs (one of which was the Speedmaster) from several jewellery stores in Houston. NASA then proceeded to abuse the watches with tests of extreme environmental conditions. Their aim was to determine if a suitable watch was available for their Space Program. The final three contenders for the "Official" NASA chronograph were a Rolex, Longines Wittnauer and the Omega. The reasons for the Rolex's departure were that it stopped running on two occasions during the Relative Humidity Tests and subsequently failed during the High Temperature Test when the sweep hand warped and was binding against the other hands on the dial. No other tests were run with the Rolex Chronograph."

From WIkipedia:

"Reportedly NASA assumed that the automatic winding mechanism was based on pendulum action like Harwood's original design, requiring either a gravity field or constant acceleration. The weightless environment therefore raised doubts about the ability of an automatic watch to wind itself. In fact a full 360-degree winding mechanism should work even better in low or zero gravity, where the friction experienced by the mechanism is lower. The rotor can thus move longer and transfer more energy into the spring. The rotor is in any case easily activated by momentum and not dependent on gravity."
(to go to the thread, click on the arrow after "Alcan" in the quote, if you want to read more replies).

I LIKE the style Buzz Aldrin is wearing his watch, btw!

Reminds me a bit of the Mr. Agnelli (former CEO of Fiat motorcars) who used to wear his watch like that

Here is a pic of him:



It DOES look silly, doesn't it??

The story behind the way he wore his watch like this is that he did not like sweat on the inner side of his bracelet. I don't think he needed to brag about his watches

__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2007, 06:11 PM   #4
entropydave
"TRF" Member
 
entropydave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: Huntington, IN
Posts: 680
That is excellent information! As for the way he wears his watch - nope, not for me... looks to me like he didn't get the strap set properly!
So... next to find me one of them Omegas!
entropydave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2007, 04:44 PM   #5
Lamone
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Watch: ya mawt!
Posts: 3,448
Looks like Buzz is sporting a Rolex!
Lamone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 December 2007, 10:30 PM   #6
TARDIS
"TRF" Member
 
TARDIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Queensland, AUST
Posts: 2,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamone View Post
Looks like Buzz is sporting a Rolex!
I thort so 2
TARDIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2007, 05:20 AM   #7
entropydave
"TRF" Member
 
entropydave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: Huntington, IN
Posts: 680
Y'know - I don't think it was - I couldn't see too closely but I am sure I would have noticed... I'll enlarge the original and see what I can see!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Image1.jpg (19.8 KB, 48 views)
entropydave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 December 2007, 05:42 PM   #8
slojoh
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: az
Posts: 283
why not
slojoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.