Quote:
Originally Posted by roro
An old 1675 is a true classic. Congrats.
All I can say is that I've bought new Rolexes and I've always ended up selling them to get vintage ones. Now all I have are "old" Rolexes
For me its not necessarily the hunt nor the rarity (although there is a certain amount of pride that comes with wearing a rare watch). The older pieces have a classier more dignified look to them IMHO. Less bling and a more minimalistic "form follows function" approach. There's also a question of size. The older watches with their 40mm thinner cases are more "civilized" than the 42mm diameter thick cased modern ones. For example, there is no need to have a thick case with a 42mm diameter on a GMT watch that is not meant to be used for diving. The "old" Sea-Dweller can withstand a depth of 1220m in a 40mm case. The new models with their big cases and maxi dials have a "if you've got it flaunt it" look which does not appeal to me. Rolex is just following the trend of big watches and I think its a shame.
That's why for me old is gold!
|
Agree 100 %, I have one of the last SD smaller version made (2006) and I won`t ever let it go at any price because it is just ``perfect`` in looks, feel and size. I would not even wear the newer SD if it was given to me for free !!
My next Rolex is a GMT and again I will go for older, smaller sizes than the newer ones ! What is trendy does not mean it is better.