ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
31 December 2012, 09:11 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Matt
Location: A long way from..
Watch: 16610
Posts: 210
|
Any patent lawyers on TRF? Wondering about "legit" fakes and The Madrid Protocol
Having read another post about Sub look alikes that are not branded as Rolex (like Steinhart and Squale, as opposed to outright fakes) I was curious about the Madrid Protocol and whether Rolex is registered, or if it even applies.
Seems like every other watch company out there makes a copy of a Rolex design. Thanks. Matt |
31 December 2012, 09:34 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: land of oz
Watch: sundial
Posts: 2,219
|
legit fake= oxymoron
I don't mind homage brands like Invicta etc as long as it stops people from buying fakes, not everyone can afford a Rolex |
31 December 2012, 09:41 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
Even Omega outright copied the Submariner bezel on the Seamaster 200 and they're blood enemies.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
31 December 2012, 09:43 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,024
|
Patents eventually expire and pass into public domain. Trademarks do not as long as they're renewed.
If a technology is used or copied after it expires, then it's permitted.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
31 December 2012, 10:26 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Matt
Location: A long way from..
Watch: 16610
Posts: 210
|
Gotcha. Here is Australia, copyright infringement is rampant and fake Rolex watches are everywhere.
Oxymoron. Too funny! Agreed. |
31 December 2012, 10:38 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Matte
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,006
|
actually, i find myself wondering more about brands that fade and then are revived by some corporation. i remember reading about a couple famous watch brands that started in the late 1800's, faded away, and then were revived under that brand again.
would you consider it a 'genuine fake?' consider hypothetically, a brand like Rolex. if people were suddenly to lose interest in them, and eventually the brand faded away, if a company 50 years post collapse revives the brand would it be considered an homage or the real deal? |
31 December 2012, 10:44 AM | #7 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,024
|
Quote:
Like the Shelby Cobra sports car, or the Dubey & Schaldenbrand watch company.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
31 December 2012, 11:05 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
There are company names like Ball, Bulova, and Hamilton that have been revived and still produce respectable watch lines in their respective tiers.
Then there are companies like Elgin, which makes a line of cheap, garish watches that would make a pimp blush. Neither is considered fake. The names have been bought are being used legally, even if they are disrespectful of their original incarnations. Then there are those watch companies that produce watches that closely resemble other brands. These are usually called homages and they are usually legal. If not then they have to deal with the patent owners. Then there are the counterfeiters who are basically organized crime. They use the names of trademark owners and produce watches that are meant to deceive and produce funds at the expense of the rightful patent and trademark owners. We don't discuss counterfeits here.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
31 December 2012, 11:05 AM | #9 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Matt
Location: A long way from..
Watch: 16610
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
Agreed. Though with so many such things the revived versions potentially lack the original character of it predecessors, sadly. Probably just my bias toward original stuff, too. One of my many character flaws... |
|
31 December 2012, 08:53 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
I don't think they are enemies, Swatch group supplies Tudor with their movements.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
31 December 2012, 10:54 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,064
|
You could say the same about Rolex the Blancpain 50 fathom was on the retail market a full 9 months before the first Rolex sub.Yet in looks they looked remarkably similar just like many watches have looked over the last 90 odd years.Its simple Rolex have not invented every single design of watch,but the brand name is so strong thats why today there are so many similar but there is only one Rolex.And even today some of the most collectible Rolex watches don't have a Rolex made movement inside the case.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.