The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 January 2013, 01:31 AM   #1
NickTruswell
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT IIC
Posts: 230
Panerai virgin, recommendations for first piece

Hi All,

I've reached the point in my collection where I now looking to branch out into other brands. As you'll see in the picture below so far it's all been about Rolex for me and I'm really happy about that but I've reached a point where i'd like to branch out into some other brands and looking to get a Panerai as my first venture outside of Rolex.

As such I'm looking for some advice as to what would be a good choice. I have a couple of requirements; 1) it must have a date, 2) it must have a seconds hand. I like both Radiomir and Luminor designs and have identified the 388 Radiomir and 312, 359 Luminor's as potential targets but would love to hear any other recommendations.

Also what are servicing costs like on Panerai and where do watches need sending too??

Thanks all
Nick
Attached Images
     
NickTruswell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 02:05 AM   #2
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
312 meets your needs but try it on. I found it slightly top heavy.



kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 02:29 AM   #3
DoxaDavid
"TRF" Member
 
DoxaDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: David
Location: Minneapolis, Mn
Posts: 3,271
You need a chrono in your collection so maybe a 250 or 196?
__________________
DOXA-AFICIONADO

"It has been my experience that folks who have no vices have very few virtues. " Abraham Lincoln 1809-1865
DoxaDavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 02:29 AM   #4
jvo300
"TRF" Member
 
jvo300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
I say bite the bullet and get a 233. I went through a lot of iterations before I landed on this one (see my PAM journey post). Mostly because I didn't want to spend so much on the watch when other alternatives existed (ie 312). Getting one per-owned is the way to go!

jvo300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 03:06 AM   #5
NickTruswell
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT IIC
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoxaDavid View Post
You need a chrono in your collection so maybe a 250 or 196?
Chrono's not my thing. Had a S/S Daytona but sold it for my TT Sub. Dial to complicated and no date
NickTruswell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 03:12 AM   #6
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by jvo300 View Post
I say bite the bullet and get a 233. I went through a lot of iterations before I landed on this one (see my PAM journey post). Mostly because I didn't want to spend so much on the watch when other alternatives existed (ie 312). Getting one per-owned is the way to go!

I agree. I prefer the 233 over a 312 as well.

kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 03:51 AM   #7
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
Yeah, you're definitely ready to branch out.

233 is an icon for sure. You could consider the bases if you don't want to commit as much cash (000, 005, 111, 112, 176, 177). Or, go large with a 372 or 422. Or........

So many great choices. Take your time and enjoy!
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 05:33 AM   #8
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
372
Attached Images
 
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 05:39 AM   #9
leechaz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Pams

Evening Nick
i had the 359 but had to sell it as i found it too top heavy and uncomfortable .
The base PAMS sit better on the wrist and all of them are stunners .
i am going to PM you .
Lee
leechaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 08:13 AM   #10
apeogre
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: No Clue
Posts: 586
Before you go out and buy a 233 or a 312, please go try them on! The 312 is one hell of a tall wobbly watch. Even though it's 44mm, I believe it's 18 or 19mm tall. It's similar to wearing a new PO chrono. With your current collection, the shear size of the 312 might take a bit getting used to. I tried one on and it looked a bit ridiculous to me. I was wearing a U1 when I tried it on, which is 44mm and about 13 or 14mm tall. I've been looking at a pam to add as well and am completely lost. Good luck!
apeogre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 08:37 AM   #11
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by apeogre View Post
Before you go out and buy a 233 or a 312, please go try them on! The 312 is one hell of a tall wobbly watch. Even though it's 44mm, I believe it's 18 or 19mm tall. It's similar to wearing a new PO chrono. With your current collection, the shear size of the 312 might take a bit getting used to. I tried one on and it looked a bit ridiculous to me. I was wearing a U1 when I tried it on, which is 44mm and about 13 or 14mm tall. I've been looking at a pam to add as well and am completely lost. Good luck!

True, trying em on is key. I love the look of the 1950 case models (312, 359, etc), but, they don't fit nearly as good on me as the Bettarini 44mm case models. Depends on wrist size and (especially) shape and body build.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 09:55 AM   #12
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
Try the 000,005,112 there nice
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 12:18 PM   #13
Travelller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Travelller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickTruswell View Post
... I have a couple of requirements; 1) it must have a date, 2) it must have a seconds hand. I like both Radiomir and Luminor designs and have identified the 388 Radiomir and 312, 359 Luminor's as potential targets...
They are probably your best bet if you don't want any additional complications (you already noted you ditched your Daytona). The only "complication" I'm going to try to sell you on is Panerai's 8-day movements. The 233 (289) mentioned is a great example and I believe the only current 8-day model(s) that satisfy your requirements. Otherwise there's the subs (305, 024, 025) and quite a few "contemporary luminors" that have date & seconds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nick c View Post
372 ... Try the 000,005,112...
I would say none of these will satisfy the OP's requirements...
__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien
Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r
Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321
Panerai 111 217 233
Rolex 16600 126600
Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033
Tudor 5B GMT
Zénith A386ME
Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora
Travelller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2013, 01:04 PM   #14
Shikar
"TRF" Member
 
Shikar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Azam
Location: Texas
Posts: 607
I did the 112 - too boring and I wanted a date .....to the 312 which was too top heavy but has a beautiful dial and case shape.......to perfection ....233 is the perfect single Pam.

Regards.
Shikar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 01:13 AM   #15
advocatia
Banned
 
advocatia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Andy
Location: Florida USA
Watch: PAM 422 GMTIIC
Posts: 868
422. No date, I know. That's what cell phones and calendars are for.
Or 372. Not a big fan of the power reserve on the dial on any Panerai. HATE the Panerai cyclops.

With Panerai, simple is best.
advocatia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 04:41 AM   #16
One Ping Only
"TRF" Member
 
One Ping Only's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Ken
Location: WI
Watch: several
Posts: 1,639
Another 233 owner saying "check it out".

Get to an AD and try on a few, see what you like and how it looks and feels on your wrist. I found the auto Luminors too tall and thought I wanted a base, but then the 233 was just right.
__________________
I have far too many expensive hobbies to even consider another one.
One Ping Only is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 10:07 AM   #17
apeogre
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: No Clue
Posts: 586
Isn't the 233 the same size as the 312? It's the same 1950's case, right?
apeogre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 10:13 AM   #18
iLLGT2
"TRF" Member
 
iLLGT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Martin
Location: NY And FLA
Watch: AP ROO Blue Scuba
Posts: 2,695
I'd say, you can keep it budget friendly and classic, with a 005..

233 for a nice power reserve/manual wind and movement, it's a beauty too and more comfy than a 359/312

Or how about a classic and timeless beauty? 162, panda/anthracite subdial Panerai and their first chrono piece. Very special to me and just gorgeous!

Nothing feels like an older Panerai to me!
iLLGT2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 10:35 AM   #19
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by apeogre View Post
Isn't the 233 the same size as the 312? It's the same 1950's case, right?
Different case.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 10:41 AM   #20
ericf4
"TRF" Member
 
ericf4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: chicago suburbs
Posts: 79
I agree on 312as it was my first Panerai......in house movement and overall sporty and dressy look so perfect for work and play......love it!
ericf4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 11:35 AM   #21
buke45
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
After giving it a lot of thought I just bought my first Pam I decided on a 321. I was just right. This is after owning 20-25 rolexes over the years and 5 Breitlings. I love the case and the whole 1950 case look, however it is a big watch and its not for everyone.
buke45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 01:31 PM   #22
p_mcgee
"TRF" Member
 
p_mcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
I flipped a couple PAMs before deciding to pay up and get a 233. Well worth it IMO.
p_mcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 06:53 PM   #23
DiverAsia
"TRF" Member
 
DiverAsia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Rich
Location: Taiwan
Watch: 16014 16610 372
Posts: 1,044
I tried on everything, and my requirements were that I wanted a date and a second hand. So, I got a 372!
Which of course has neither. That is because I thought I knew what I wanted before I saw what I wanted!
Cheers! have fun in your search. oh yeah, check out the 233s and save some money by not flipping 2-3 pams before you plunk down some cash for what everyone really wants....a 233.
__________________
He's a rebel and a runner
He's a signal turning green
He's a restless young romantic
Wants to run the big machine
DiverAsia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2013, 07:07 PM   #24
apeogre
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: No Clue
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Different case.
I'm assuming the overall watch is shorter? Hence why everyone is raving about it....
apeogre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 January 2013, 12:01 AM   #25
jvo300
"TRF" Member
 
jvo300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by apeogre View Post
I'm assuming the overall watch is shorter? Hence why everyone is raving about it....
It wears much flatter on the wrist because it isn't as thick as those with automatic movements.
jvo300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.